The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic

The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) held “great practical significance” for education as it identified how instruction can optimally impact learner development: by aligning mediation not to abilities that have already fully formed but to those that are emerging or “ripening” [30]. Despite being o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Poehner M.E., Lantolf J.P.
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN RU
Publicado:	Moscow State University of Psychology and Education 2021
Materias:	zone of proximal development methodological imperative dynamic assessment prediction transformation transposition creativity dialectic History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/77797ca4438c4200941f126412739a16
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:77797ca4438c4200941f126412739a16
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:77797ca4438c4200941f126412739a162021-11-30T09:10:55ZThe ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic10.17759/chp.20211703061816-54352224-8935https://doaj.org/article/77797ca4438c4200941f126412739a162021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://psyjournals.ru/en/kip/2021/n3/Poehner_Lantolf.shtmlhttps://doaj.org/toc/1816-5435https://doaj.org/toc/2224-8935The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) held “great practical significance” for education as it identified how instruction can optimally impact learner development: by aligning mediation not to abilities that have already fully formed but to those that are emerging or “ripening” [30]. Despite being one of the most well-known and influential features of Vygotsky’s writings, it has also been subject to critique. For instance, it is [25] suggested that Vygotsky introduced a “methodological paradox” in formulating the ZPD: it endeavors to bring into focus proximal or future psychological functioning by engaging in teaching-learning activity in the present. In their view, this means that direct, empirical study of the ZPD is not possible as it can only be inferred retrospectively, once future abilities have become the new present [25]. Moreover, Valsiner and van der Veer [25] charged that Vygotsky’s depiction of the ZPD did not reflect his commitment to dialectical thinking because the concept does not allow for the creation of anything new but implies “mere transposition from the interindividual to the intraindividual domain” [25, p. 48]. Supporting our arguments with examples from research in our field of second language (L2) studies, we propose that attention to changes in the quality of mediation learners require during ZPD activity offers a means of observing the future as the abilities in question shift from ‘ripening’ to ‘developed.’ In this way, future independent performance is brought into the present during dialectical activity wherein tension between learner actual abilities and the demands of the task are resolved through mediator-learner cooperation. We propose this process as a way of realizing ‘the methodological imperative’ that was sought after by Vygotsky [26]. We then consider the importance of the relationship between learner transposition of ideal language features presented through instruction and the development of the ability to creatively manipulate these features in order to shape how others construe objects and events in accordance with the user’s personal perspective.Poehner M.E.Lantolf J.P.Moscow State University of Psychology and Educationarticlezone of proximal developmentmethodological imperativedynamic assessmentpredictiontransformationtranspositioncreativitydialecticHistory of scholarship and learning. The humanitiesAZ20-999ENRUКультурно-историческая психология, Vol 17, Iss 3, Pp 31-41 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN RU
topic	zone of proximal development methodological imperative dynamic assessment prediction transformation transposition creativity dialectic History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999
spellingShingle	zone of proximal development methodological imperative dynamic assessment prediction transformation transposition creativity dialectic History of scholarship and learning. The humanities AZ20-999 Poehner M.E. Lantolf J.P. The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic
description	The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) held “great practical significance” for education as it identified how instruction can optimally impact learner development: by aligning mediation not to abilities that have already fully formed but to those that are emerging or “ripening” [30]. Despite being one of the most well-known and influential features of Vygotsky’s writings, it has also been subject to critique. For instance, it is [25] suggested that Vygotsky introduced a “methodological paradox” in formulating the ZPD: it endeavors to bring into focus proximal or future psychological functioning by engaging in teaching-learning activity in the present. In their view, this means that direct, empirical study of the ZPD is not possible as it can only be inferred retrospectively, once future abilities have become the new present [25]. Moreover, Valsiner and van der Veer [25] charged that Vygotsky’s depiction of the ZPD did not reflect his commitment to dialectical thinking because the concept does not allow for the creation of anything new but implies “mere transposition from the interindividual to the intraindividual domain” [25, p. 48]. Supporting our arguments with examples from research in our field of second language (L2) studies, we propose that attention to changes in the quality of mediation learners require during ZPD activity offers a means of observing the future as the abilities in question shift from ‘ripening’ to ‘developed.’ In this way, future independent performance is brought into the present during dialectical activity wherein tension between learner actual abilities and the demands of the task are resolved through mediator-learner cooperation. We propose this process as a way of realizing ‘the methodological imperative’ that was sought after by Vygotsky [26]. We then consider the importance of the relationship between learner transposition of ideal language features presented through instruction and the development of the ability to creatively manipulate these features in order to shape how others construe objects and events in accordance with the user’s personal perspective.
format	article
author	Poehner M.E. Lantolf J.P.
author_facet	Poehner M.E. Lantolf J.P.
author_sort	Poehner M.E.
title	The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic
title_short	The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic
title_full	The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic
title_fullStr	The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic
title_full_unstemmed	The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic
title_sort	zpd, second language learning, and the тransposition ~ transformation dialectic
publisher	Moscow State University of Psychology and Education
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/77797ca4438c4200941f126412739a16
work_keys_str_mv	AT poehnerme thezpdsecondlanguagelearningandthetranspositiontransformationdialectic AT lantolfjp thezpdsecondlanguagelearningandthetranspositiontransformationdialectic AT poehnerme zpdsecondlanguagelearningandthetranspositiontransformationdialectic AT lantolfjp zpdsecondlanguagelearningandthetranspositiontransformationdialectic
_version_	1718406691068837888

The ZPD, Second Language Learning, and the Тransposition ~ Transformation Dialectic

Ejemplares similares