Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering

The final biochemical and mechanical performance of an implant or scaffold are defined by its structure, as well as the raw materials and processing conditions used during its fabrication. Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing (AM) are two contrasting processing technologies that have gained po...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: James A. Smith, Elisa Mele
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7794544240dd4a65916e6b14626e343b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7794544240dd4a65916e6b14626e343b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7794544240dd4a65916e6b14626e343b2021-12-01T19:29:17ZElectrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering2296-418510.3389/fbioe.2021.674738https://doaj.org/article/7794544240dd4a65916e6b14626e343b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2021.674738/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/2296-4185The final biochemical and mechanical performance of an implant or scaffold are defined by its structure, as well as the raw materials and processing conditions used during its fabrication. Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing (AM) are two contrasting processing technologies that have gained popularity amongst the fields of medical research i.e., tissue engineering, implant design, drug delivery. Electrospinning technology is favored for its ability to produce micro- to nanometer fibers from polymer solutions and melts, of which, the dimensions, alignment, porosity, and chemical composition are easily manipulatable to the desired application. AM, on the other hand, offers unrivalled levels of geometrical freedom, allowing highly complex components (i.e., patient-specific) to be built inexpensively within 24 hours. Hence, adopting both technologies together appears to be a progressive step in pursuit of scaffolds that better match the natural architecture of human tissues. Here, we present recent insights into the advances on hybrid scaffolds produced by combining electrospinning (melt electrospinning excluded) and AM, specifically multi-layered architectures consisting of alternating fibers and AM elements, and bioinks reinforced with fibers prior to AM. We discuss how cellular behavior (attachment, migration, and differentiation) is influenced by the co-existence of these micro- and nano-features.James A. SmithElisa MeleFrontiers Media S.A.articleelectrospininngtissue engineeringadditive manufactuinghybrid scaffoldsnanofibersBiotechnologyTP248.13-248.65ENFrontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, Vol 9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic electrospininng
tissue engineering
additive manufactuing
hybrid scaffolds
nanofibers
Biotechnology
TP248.13-248.65
spellingShingle electrospininng
tissue engineering
additive manufactuing
hybrid scaffolds
nanofibers
Biotechnology
TP248.13-248.65
James A. Smith
Elisa Mele
Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
description The final biochemical and mechanical performance of an implant or scaffold are defined by its structure, as well as the raw materials and processing conditions used during its fabrication. Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing (AM) are two contrasting processing technologies that have gained popularity amongst the fields of medical research i.e., tissue engineering, implant design, drug delivery. Electrospinning technology is favored for its ability to produce micro- to nanometer fibers from polymer solutions and melts, of which, the dimensions, alignment, porosity, and chemical composition are easily manipulatable to the desired application. AM, on the other hand, offers unrivalled levels of geometrical freedom, allowing highly complex components (i.e., patient-specific) to be built inexpensively within 24 hours. Hence, adopting both technologies together appears to be a progressive step in pursuit of scaffolds that better match the natural architecture of human tissues. Here, we present recent insights into the advances on hybrid scaffolds produced by combining electrospinning (melt electrospinning excluded) and AM, specifically multi-layered architectures consisting of alternating fibers and AM elements, and bioinks reinforced with fibers prior to AM. We discuss how cellular behavior (attachment, migration, and differentiation) is influenced by the co-existence of these micro- and nano-features.
format article
author James A. Smith
Elisa Mele
author_facet James A. Smith
Elisa Mele
author_sort James A. Smith
title Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
title_short Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
title_full Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed Electrospinning and Additive Manufacturing: Adding Three-Dimensionality to Electrospun Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering
title_sort electrospinning and additive manufacturing: adding three-dimensionality to electrospun scaffolds for tissue engineering
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7794544240dd4a65916e6b14626e343b
work_keys_str_mv AT jamesasmith electrospinningandadditivemanufacturingaddingthreedimensionalitytoelectrospunscaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT elisamele electrospinningandadditivemanufacturingaddingthreedimensionalitytoelectrospunscaffoldsfortissueengineering
_version_ 1718404638829445120