“The Intentional Fallacy”, itself a Fallacy: a Critique of Wimsatt and Beardsley’s “The Intentional Fallacy”
Abstract This research aims to highlight the falsities of William K. Wimsatt and Monroe C. Beardsley’s article “The Intentional Fallacy” (1946). These two New Critics believe that the intention of the author should not be considered when judging the text because the intention of the author is neith...
Enregistré dans:
Auteurs principaux: | Sareh Khosravi, Behzad Barekat |
---|---|
Format: | article |
Langue: | AR EN FA RU |
Publié: |
Language Art
2021
|
Sujets: | |
Accès en ligne: | https://doaj.org/article/77a325c8c4fe44b1abd2960759d482d2 |
Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Documents similaires
-
New invariants and dimensionless numbers: futile renaissance of old fallacies?
par: NESPOLO,ROBERTO F
Publié: (2005) -
Loss Aversion as a Potential Factor in the Sunk-Cost Fallacy
par: Veronika Tait, et autres
Publié: (2019) -
Explanation of Stephen Hawking’s fallacy of the Big Bang Theory and denial of the existence of God
par: Mikaeel Jamalpoor, et autres
Publié: (2021) -
Collective intentionality vs. intersubjective and social intentionality. An account of collective intentionality as shared intentionality
par: Francesca De Vecchi
Publié: (2016) -
FINANCIAL DIAGNOSTICS OF INTENTIONAL BANKRUPTCY
par: G. V. Kalvarsky, et autres
Publié: (2014)