A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort

Abstract Selective identification of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC) is a pivotal issue. Development of a risk model for detecting sPC based on the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and clinical parameters...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kazushige Sakaguchi, Michikata Hayashida, Naoto Tanaka, Suguru Oka, Shinji Urakami
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/77d61255beb94204b1af7c36031dec6b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:77d61255beb94204b1af7c36031dec6b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:77d61255beb94204b1af7c36031dec6b2021-12-02T18:14:00ZA risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort10.1038/s41598-021-98195-22045-2322https://doaj.org/article/77d61255beb94204b1af7c36031dec6b2021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-98195-2https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Selective identification of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC) is a pivotal issue. Development of a risk model for detecting sPC based on the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and clinical parameters in a Japanese cohort is expected to prove beneficial. We retrospectively analyzed clinical parameters and bpMRI findings from 773 biopsy-naïve patients between January 2011 and December 2016. A risk model was established using multivariate logistic regression analysis and presented on a nomogram. Discrimination of the risk model was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Statistical differences between the predictive model and clinical parameters were analyzed using DeLong test. sPC was detected in 343 men (44.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict sPC revealed age (P = 0.002), log prostate-specific antigen (P < 0.001), prostate volume (P < 0.001) and PI-RADS scores (P < 0.001) as significant contributors to the model. Area under the curve was higher for the risk model (0.862), than for age (0.646), log prostate-specific antigen (0.652), prostate volume (0.697) or imaging score (0.822). DeLong test results also showed that the novel risk model performed significantly better than those parameters (P < 0.05). This novel risk model performed significantly better compared with PI-RADS scores and other parameters alone, and is thus expected to prove beneficial in making decisions regarding biopsy on suspicion of sPC.Kazushige SakaguchiMichikata HayashidaNaoto TanakaSuguru OkaShinji UrakamiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kazushige Sakaguchi
Michikata Hayashida
Naoto Tanaka
Suguru Oka
Shinji Urakami
A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort
description Abstract Selective identification of men with clinically significant prostate cancer (sPC) is a pivotal issue. Development of a risk model for detecting sPC based on the prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) for bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and clinical parameters in a Japanese cohort is expected to prove beneficial. We retrospectively analyzed clinical parameters and bpMRI findings from 773 biopsy-naïve patients between January 2011 and December 2016. A risk model was established using multivariate logistic regression analysis and presented on a nomogram. Discrimination of the risk model was compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Statistical differences between the predictive model and clinical parameters were analyzed using DeLong test. sPC was detected in 343 men (44.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis to predict sPC revealed age (P = 0.002), log prostate-specific antigen (P < 0.001), prostate volume (P < 0.001) and PI-RADS scores (P < 0.001) as significant contributors to the model. Area under the curve was higher for the risk model (0.862), than for age (0.646), log prostate-specific antigen (0.652), prostate volume (0.697) or imaging score (0.822). DeLong test results also showed that the novel risk model performed significantly better than those parameters (P < 0.05). This novel risk model performed significantly better compared with PI-RADS scores and other parameters alone, and is thus expected to prove beneficial in making decisions regarding biopsy on suspicion of sPC.
format article
author Kazushige Sakaguchi
Michikata Hayashida
Naoto Tanaka
Suguru Oka
Shinji Urakami
author_facet Kazushige Sakaguchi
Michikata Hayashida
Naoto Tanaka
Suguru Oka
Shinji Urakami
author_sort Kazushige Sakaguchi
title A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort
title_short A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort
title_full A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort
title_fullStr A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort
title_full_unstemmed A risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a Japanese cohort
title_sort risk model for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer based on bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging in a japanese cohort
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/77d61255beb94204b1af7c36031dec6b
work_keys_str_mv AT kazushigesakaguchi ariskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT michikatahayashida ariskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT naototanaka ariskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT suguruoka ariskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT shinjiurakami ariskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT kazushigesakaguchi riskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT michikatahayashida riskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT naototanaka riskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT suguruoka riskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
AT shinjiurakami riskmodelfordetectingclinicallysignificantprostatecancerbasedonbiparametricmagneticresonanceimaginginajapanesecohort
_version_ 1718378459508506624