An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket

Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polyp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Muhsin J. Jweeg, Samira K. Radhi, Haider F. Neama
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad 2007
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca2021-12-02T06:05:33ZAn experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket1818-11712312-0789https://doaj.org/article/77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca2007-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://alkej.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/alkej/article/view/619https://doaj.org/toc/1818-1171https://doaj.org/toc/2312-0789 Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polypropylene socket is relatively cheap in comparing with the laminates. Experimental study is conducted to compare the stiffness of five prosthetic sockets made of different materials. Compression, three point flexural and tensile tests are implemented by the Testometric machine. The laminate sockets give better results in compression than polypropylene. Polypropylene gives good results in bending compared with the laminate sockets. When the socket loads are mainly in compression i.e. the low activity level patients, it seems that any of the tested sockets could be used, however, when the load will be not only in compression but in flexion as well i.e. high activity patients, socket No.1 and 5 could be used. Muhsin J. JweegSamira K. RadhiHaider F. NeamaAl-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of BaghdadarticleChemical engineeringTP155-156Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAl-Khawarizmi Engineering Journal, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2007)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
spellingShingle Chemical engineering
TP155-156
Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)
TA1-2040
Muhsin J. Jweeg
Samira K. Radhi
Haider F. Neama
An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
description Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polypropylene socket is relatively cheap in comparing with the laminates. Experimental study is conducted to compare the stiffness of five prosthetic sockets made of different materials. Compression, three point flexural and tensile tests are implemented by the Testometric machine. The laminate sockets give better results in compression than polypropylene. Polypropylene gives good results in bending compared with the laminate sockets. When the socket loads are mainly in compression i.e. the low activity level patients, it seems that any of the tested sockets could be used, however, when the load will be not only in compression but in flexion as well i.e. high activity patients, socket No.1 and 5 could be used.
format article
author Muhsin J. Jweeg
Samira K. Radhi
Haider F. Neama
author_facet Muhsin J. Jweeg
Samira K. Radhi
Haider F. Neama
author_sort Muhsin J. Jweeg
title An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_short An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_full An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_fullStr An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_full_unstemmed An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
title_sort experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
publisher Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad
publishDate 2007
url https://doaj.org/article/77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca
work_keys_str_mv AT muhsinjjweeg anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT samirakradhi anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT haiderfneama anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT muhsinjjweeg experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT samirakradhi experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
AT haiderfneama experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket
_version_ 1718400058539376640