An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket
Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polyp...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad
2007
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca2021-12-02T06:05:33ZAn experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket1818-11712312-0789https://doaj.org/article/77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca2007-03-01T00:00:00Zhttp://alkej.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/alkej/article/view/619https://doaj.org/toc/1818-1171https://doaj.org/toc/2312-0789 Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polypropylene socket is relatively cheap in comparing with the laminates. Experimental study is conducted to compare the stiffness of five prosthetic sockets made of different materials. Compression, three point flexural and tensile tests are implemented by the Testometric machine. The laminate sockets give better results in compression than polypropylene. Polypropylene gives good results in bending compared with the laminate sockets. When the socket loads are mainly in compression i.e. the low activity level patients, it seems that any of the tested sockets could be used, however, when the load will be not only in compression but in flexion as well i.e. high activity patients, socket No.1 and 5 could be used. Muhsin J. JweegSamira K. RadhiHaider F. NeamaAl-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of BaghdadarticleChemical engineeringTP155-156Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General)TA1-2040ENAl-Khawarizmi Engineering Journal, Vol 3, Iss 1 (2007) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Chemical engineering TP155-156 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 |
spellingShingle |
Chemical engineering TP155-156 Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) TA1-2040 Muhsin J. Jweeg Samira K. Radhi Haider F. Neama An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket |
description |
Most researchers concentrate their studies on the design, stress and pressure distributions of the prosthetic socket. A little attention is considered for the stiffness of the various materials of the prosthetic sockets. Prosthetic laminated sockets in Iraq are costly to be manufactured while polypropylene socket is relatively cheap in comparing with the laminates.
Experimental study is conducted to compare the stiffness of five prosthetic sockets made of different materials. Compression, three point flexural and tensile tests are implemented by the Testometric machine. The laminate sockets give better results in compression than polypropylene. Polypropylene gives good results in bending compared with the laminate sockets. When the socket loads are mainly in compression i.e. the low activity level patients, it seems that any of the tested sockets could be used, however, when the load will be not only in compression but in flexion as well i.e. high activity patients, socket No.1 and 5 could be used.
|
format |
article |
author |
Muhsin J. Jweeg Samira K. Radhi Haider F. Neama |
author_facet |
Muhsin J. Jweeg Samira K. Radhi Haider F. Neama |
author_sort |
Muhsin J. Jweeg |
title |
An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket |
title_short |
An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket |
title_full |
An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket |
title_fullStr |
An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket |
title_full_unstemmed |
An experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket |
title_sort |
experimental comparative study between polypropylene and laminated lower limb prosthetic socket |
publisher |
Al-Khwarizmi College of Engineering – University of Baghdad |
publishDate |
2007 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/77d711ba9d5c45fa9e20bc34ef4b21ca |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT muhsinjjweeg anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket AT samirakradhi anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket AT haiderfneama anexperimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket AT muhsinjjweeg experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket AT samirakradhi experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket AT haiderfneama experimentalcomparativestudybetweenpolypropyleneandlaminatedlowerlimbprostheticsocket |
_version_ |
1718400058539376640 |