Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes.
In the current research, 68 specimens of orbital superior and/or medial walls taken from 33 human cadavers (12 females, 21 males) were subjected to uniaxial tension untill fracture. The samples were cut in the coronal (38 specimens) and sagittal (30 specimens) planes of the orbital wall. Apparent de...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7815d313768441d8acb2789d9ba90c20 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7815d313768441d8acb2789d9ba90c20 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7815d313768441d8acb2789d9ba90c202021-12-02T20:06:03ZTensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0259363https://doaj.org/article/7815d313768441d8acb2789d9ba90c202021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259363https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203In the current research, 68 specimens of orbital superior and/or medial walls taken from 33 human cadavers (12 females, 21 males) were subjected to uniaxial tension untill fracture. The samples were cut in the coronal (38 specimens) and sagittal (30 specimens) planes of the orbital wall. Apparent density (ρapp), tensile Young's modulus (E-modulus) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) were identified. Innovative test protocols were used to minimize artifacts and analyze the obtained data: (1) grips dedicated to non-symmetrical samples clamping were applied for mechanical testing, (2) non-contact measuring system of video-extensometer was employed for displacement registration, (3) ink imprint technique coupled with CAD analysis was applied to precisely access the cross-sectional areas of tested samples. With regard to a pooled group, apparent density for the coronal and sagittal cut plane was equal 1.53 g/cm3 and 1.57 g/cm3, tensile Young's modulus 2.36 GPa and 2.14 GPa, and ultimate tensile strength 12.66 MPa and 14.35 MPa, respectively. No significant statistical differences (p > 0.05) were found for all the analyzed parameters when comparing coronal and sagittal plane cut groups. These observations confirmed the hypothesis that direction of sample cut does not affect the mechanical response of the orbital wall tissue, thus suggesting that mechanical properties of orbital wall bone show isotropic character.Krzysztof ZerdzickiPawel LemskiPawel KlosowskiAndrzej SkorekMarcin Zmuda TrzebiatowskiMateusz KoberdaPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 11, p e0259363 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Krzysztof Zerdzicki Pawel Lemski Pawel Klosowski Andrzej Skorek Marcin Zmuda Trzebiatowski Mateusz Koberda Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes. |
description |
In the current research, 68 specimens of orbital superior and/or medial walls taken from 33 human cadavers (12 females, 21 males) were subjected to uniaxial tension untill fracture. The samples were cut in the coronal (38 specimens) and sagittal (30 specimens) planes of the orbital wall. Apparent density (ρapp), tensile Young's modulus (E-modulus) and ultimate tensile strength (UTS) were identified. Innovative test protocols were used to minimize artifacts and analyze the obtained data: (1) grips dedicated to non-symmetrical samples clamping were applied for mechanical testing, (2) non-contact measuring system of video-extensometer was employed for displacement registration, (3) ink imprint technique coupled with CAD analysis was applied to precisely access the cross-sectional areas of tested samples. With regard to a pooled group, apparent density for the coronal and sagittal cut plane was equal 1.53 g/cm3 and 1.57 g/cm3, tensile Young's modulus 2.36 GPa and 2.14 GPa, and ultimate tensile strength 12.66 MPa and 14.35 MPa, respectively. No significant statistical differences (p > 0.05) were found for all the analyzed parameters when comparing coronal and sagittal plane cut groups. These observations confirmed the hypothesis that direction of sample cut does not affect the mechanical response of the orbital wall tissue, thus suggesting that mechanical properties of orbital wall bone show isotropic character. |
format |
article |
author |
Krzysztof Zerdzicki Pawel Lemski Pawel Klosowski Andrzej Skorek Marcin Zmuda Trzebiatowski Mateusz Koberda |
author_facet |
Krzysztof Zerdzicki Pawel Lemski Pawel Klosowski Andrzej Skorek Marcin Zmuda Trzebiatowski Mateusz Koberda |
author_sort |
Krzysztof Zerdzicki |
title |
Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes. |
title_short |
Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes. |
title_full |
Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes. |
title_fullStr |
Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes. |
title_sort |
tensile modulus of human orbital wall bones cut in sagittal and coronal planes. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7815d313768441d8acb2789d9ba90c20 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT krzysztofzerdzicki tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes AT pawellemski tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes AT pawelklosowski tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes AT andrzejskorek tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes AT marcinzmudatrzebiatowski tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes AT mateuszkoberda tensilemodulusofhumanorbitalwallbonescutinsagittalandcoronalplanes |
_version_ |
1718375434578558976 |