Diskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy

This article aims to explain the debate about money politics from an istishlahy perspektif. Money politics is an effort to influence the electoral masses in exchange for certain materials that someone does not exercise their right to vote or exercise their rights in a certain way. This practice make...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Mahbub Ainur Rafiq
Formato: article
Lenguaje:ID
Publicado: Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/78b0b0a345fb4ea1950cb25bfc48a6a3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:78b0b0a345fb4ea1950cb25bfc48a6a3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:78b0b0a345fb4ea1950cb25bfc48a6a32021-11-14T06:40:22ZDiskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy2548-33742548-338210.29240/jhi.v6i2.2074https://doaj.org/article/78b0b0a345fb4ea1950cb25bfc48a6a32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://journal.iaincurup.ac.id/index.php/alistinbath/article/view/2074https://doaj.org/toc/2548-3374https://doaj.org/toc/2548-3382This article aims to explain the debate about money politics from an istishlahy perspektif. Money politics is an effort to influence the electoral masses in exchange for certain materials that someone does not exercise their right to vote or exercise their rights in a certain way. This practice make the stability of the political climate is disrupted. That is why, positive law prohibits the practice of money politics. The discourse on money politics is very interesting in the fiqh literature, if there is a concern that not giving money in a contestation of positions will fall to the wrongdoer. So the majority of scholars give privileges to do this practice, and this is not included in the category of bribery. The researcher is interested in examining more deeply the discourse on the debate about the provisions of the practice of money politics. This qualitative research using the ushul fiqh approach aims to examine methodologically more deeply the discourse on the debate about the provisions of the practice of money politics.This debate will be examined using the istishlahy method. The result of this article is: First, this practice can be applied to risywah. Due to the similarity ‘illat (logical ratio), namely khauf al-mail. Second, there is a privilege in conditions that are very far from idealism in practicing money politics, as long as the indicators which are the prevailing factors of money politics practice are found in the socio-political reality.Mahbub Ainur RafiqInstitut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curuparticlemotivationmoney politicsistishlahyIslamic lawKBP1-4860IDAl-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, Vol 6, Iss 2, Pp 179-204 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language ID
topic motivation
money politics
istishlahy
Islamic law
KBP1-4860
spellingShingle motivation
money politics
istishlahy
Islamic law
KBP1-4860
Mahbub Ainur Rafiq
Diskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy
description This article aims to explain the debate about money politics from an istishlahy perspektif. Money politics is an effort to influence the electoral masses in exchange for certain materials that someone does not exercise their right to vote or exercise their rights in a certain way. This practice make the stability of the political climate is disrupted. That is why, positive law prohibits the practice of money politics. The discourse on money politics is very interesting in the fiqh literature, if there is a concern that not giving money in a contestation of positions will fall to the wrongdoer. So the majority of scholars give privileges to do this practice, and this is not included in the category of bribery. The researcher is interested in examining more deeply the discourse on the debate about the provisions of the practice of money politics. This qualitative research using the ushul fiqh approach aims to examine methodologically more deeply the discourse on the debate about the provisions of the practice of money politics.This debate will be examined using the istishlahy method. The result of this article is: First, this practice can be applied to risywah. Due to the similarity ‘illat (logical ratio), namely khauf al-mail. Second, there is a privilege in conditions that are very far from idealism in practicing money politics, as long as the indicators which are the prevailing factors of money politics practice are found in the socio-political reality.
format article
author Mahbub Ainur Rafiq
author_facet Mahbub Ainur Rafiq
author_sort Mahbub Ainur Rafiq
title Diskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy
title_short Diskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy
title_full Diskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy
title_fullStr Diskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy
title_full_unstemmed Diskursus Perdebatan Praktik Money Politics dalam Perspektif Metode Istishlahy
title_sort diskursus perdebatan praktik money politics dalam perspektif metode istishlahy
publisher Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/78b0b0a345fb4ea1950cb25bfc48a6a3
work_keys_str_mv AT mahbubainurrafiq diskursusperdebatanpraktikmoneypoliticsdalamperspektifmetodeistishlahy
_version_ 1718429843749601280