Disparity in Delivery: Why Is What Is Good for the Goose, Not Good for the Gander? Cervical Cancer Screening Program Strategies in LMICs Are Inferior
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | A. Sawaya, R. Anand, S. Venkatapuram, N. Rodriguez, R. Dewar |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/78e0f1e9dede48e6ac93f823a9ffef83 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Ejemplares similares
-
Why common good matters
por: Dherse, Jean-Loup
Publicado: (2014) -
What patients consider to be a ‘good’ doctor, and what doctors consider to be a ‘good’ patient
por: Borracci,Raúl A., et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
On the Power of A (Good) Story: Why Game of Thrones Had to End (This Way) And What Can Slavoj Žižek Tell Us About It?
por: Ivana Gačanović
Publicado: (2019) -
Book Review - Why we need welfare: collective action for the common good
por: Peter Wells
Publicado: (2020) -
Persistent racial disparities in cervical cancer screening with Pap test
por: Cassidi C. McDaniel, et al.
Publicado: (2021)