The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome

<span class="abs_content">The relative hegemony of land rentiers and real estate developers over the process of urban socio-economic reproduction is a defining characteristic of the "collusive regime" of Rome. Through the analysis of a case study, we tried to establish if t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Edoardo Esposito, Giulio Moini, Barbara Pizzo
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Coordinamento SIBA 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/78f6bd2011fb41239c35596a469e0f95
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:78f6bd2011fb41239c35596a469e0f95
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:78f6bd2011fb41239c35596a469e0f952021-11-21T15:11:42ZThe Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome1972-76232035-660910.1285/i20356609v14i2p806https://doaj.org/article/78f6bd2011fb41239c35596a469e0f952021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/24260https://doaj.org/toc/1972-7623https://doaj.org/toc/2035-6609<span class="abs_content">The relative hegemony of land rentiers and real estate developers over the process of urban socio-economic reproduction is a defining characteristic of the "collusive regime" of Rome. Through the analysis of a case study, we tried to establish if the realisation of Urban Development Projects in this regime favours the unequal distribution of the benefits deriving from urban development. Applying a neo-Gramscian lens to urban political economy, we identified an interpretative model for explaining the role of UDPs in the urban regime of Rome. First, UDPs are suitable occasions for realising accumulation strategies based on the capture of rent gaps and the valorisation of urban assets. Second, the actors involved in UDPs mobilise ideational and material resources for gathering consensus for a project, that rewards their specific interests, by framing their investment as the best solution for localised collective needs. UDPs in Rome, therefore, facilitate the concentration of benefits and the generalisation of costs of urban development. Our research contributes to the understanding of Rome's fragile trajectory of growth and offers insights on the mechanisms reinforcing unequal urban development.</span><br />Edoardo EspositoGiulio MoiniBarbara PizzoCoordinamento SIBAarticleneo-gramscian approachromeunequal urban developmenturban development projectsurban regimeurban rentPolitical science (General)JA1-92ENPartecipazione e Conflitto, Vol 14, Iss 2, Pp 806-828 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic neo-gramscian approach
rome
unequal urban development
urban development projects
urban regime
urban rent
Political science (General)
JA1-92
spellingShingle neo-gramscian approach
rome
unequal urban development
urban development projects
urban regime
urban rent
Political science (General)
JA1-92
Edoardo Esposito
Giulio Moini
Barbara Pizzo
The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome
description <span class="abs_content">The relative hegemony of land rentiers and real estate developers over the process of urban socio-economic reproduction is a defining characteristic of the "collusive regime" of Rome. Through the analysis of a case study, we tried to establish if the realisation of Urban Development Projects in this regime favours the unequal distribution of the benefits deriving from urban development. Applying a neo-Gramscian lens to urban political economy, we identified an interpretative model for explaining the role of UDPs in the urban regime of Rome. First, UDPs are suitable occasions for realising accumulation strategies based on the capture of rent gaps and the valorisation of urban assets. Second, the actors involved in UDPs mobilise ideational and material resources for gathering consensus for a project, that rewards their specific interests, by framing their investment as the best solution for localised collective needs. UDPs in Rome, therefore, facilitate the concentration of benefits and the generalisation of costs of urban development. Our research contributes to the understanding of Rome's fragile trajectory of growth and offers insights on the mechanisms reinforcing unequal urban development.</span><br />
format article
author Edoardo Esposito
Giulio Moini
Barbara Pizzo
author_facet Edoardo Esposito
Giulio Moini
Barbara Pizzo
author_sort Edoardo Esposito
title The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome
title_short The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome
title_full The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome
title_fullStr The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome
title_full_unstemmed The Political Economy of a Collusive Urban Regime: Making Sense of Urban Development Projects in Rome
title_sort political economy of a collusive urban regime: making sense of urban development projects in rome
publisher Coordinamento SIBA
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/78f6bd2011fb41239c35596a469e0f95
work_keys_str_mv AT edoardoesposito thepoliticaleconomyofacollusiveurbanregimemakingsenseofurbandevelopmentprojectsinrome
AT giuliomoini thepoliticaleconomyofacollusiveurbanregimemakingsenseofurbandevelopmentprojectsinrome
AT barbarapizzo thepoliticaleconomyofacollusiveurbanregimemakingsenseofurbandevelopmentprojectsinrome
AT edoardoesposito politicaleconomyofacollusiveurbanregimemakingsenseofurbandevelopmentprojectsinrome
AT giuliomoini politicaleconomyofacollusiveurbanregimemakingsenseofurbandevelopmentprojectsinrome
AT barbarapizzo politicaleconomyofacollusiveurbanregimemakingsenseofurbandevelopmentprojectsinrome
_version_ 1718418708802568192