Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.

Wildlife rehabilitation is a publicly popular practice, though not without controversy. State wildlife agencies frequently debate the ecological impact of rehabilitation. By analyzing case records, we can clarify and quantify the causes for rehabilitation, species involved, and treatment outcomes. T...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Melissa Hanson, Nicholas Hollingshead, Krysten Schuler, William F Siemer, Patrick Martin, Elizabeth M Bunting
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7905cd28845940abab18885d3ad47dd6
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7905cd28845940abab18885d3ad47dd6
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7905cd28845940abab18885d3ad47dd62021-12-02T20:17:28ZSpecies, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0257675https://doaj.org/article/7905cd28845940abab18885d3ad47dd62021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257675https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Wildlife rehabilitation is a publicly popular practice, though not without controversy. State wildlife agencies frequently debate the ecological impact of rehabilitation. By analyzing case records, we can clarify and quantify the causes for rehabilitation, species involved, and treatment outcomes. This data would aid regulatory agencies and rehabilitators in making informed decisions, as well as gaining insight into causes of species mortality. In New York State, the Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) has licensed rehabilitators since 1980 and annual reporting is required. In this study, we analyzed 58,185 individual wildlife cases that were attended by New York rehabilitators between 2012 and 2014. These encompassed 30,182 (51.9%) birds, 25,447 (43.7%) mammals, 2,421 (4.2%) reptiles, and 75 (0.1%) amphibians. We identified patterns among taxonomic representation, reasons for presentation to a rehabilitation center, and animal disposition. Major causes of presentation were trauma (n = 22,156; 38.1%) and orphaning (n = 21,679; 37.3%), with habitat loss (n = 3,937; 6.8%), infectious disease (n = 1,824; 3.1%), and poisoning or toxin exposure (n = 806; 1.4%) playing lesser roles. The overall release rate for animals receiving care was 50.2% while 45.3% died or were euthanized during the rehabilitation process. A relatively small number (0.3%) were permanently non-releasable and placed in captivity; 4.1% had unknown outcomes. A comparable evaluation in 1989 revealed that wildlife submissions have increased (annual mean 12,583 vs 19,395), and are accompanied by a significant improvement in release (50.2% in the study period vs 44.4% in 1989) (χ2(1) = 90.43, p < 0.0001). In this manuscript, we aim to describe the rehabilitator community in New York State, and present the causes and outcomes for rehabilitation over a three-year period.Melissa HansonNicholas HollingsheadKrysten SchulerWilliam F SiemerPatrick MartinElizabeth M BuntingPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 16, Iss 9, p e0257675 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Melissa Hanson
Nicholas Hollingshead
Krysten Schuler
William F Siemer
Patrick Martin
Elizabeth M Bunting
Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.
description Wildlife rehabilitation is a publicly popular practice, though not without controversy. State wildlife agencies frequently debate the ecological impact of rehabilitation. By analyzing case records, we can clarify and quantify the causes for rehabilitation, species involved, and treatment outcomes. This data would aid regulatory agencies and rehabilitators in making informed decisions, as well as gaining insight into causes of species mortality. In New York State, the Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) has licensed rehabilitators since 1980 and annual reporting is required. In this study, we analyzed 58,185 individual wildlife cases that were attended by New York rehabilitators between 2012 and 2014. These encompassed 30,182 (51.9%) birds, 25,447 (43.7%) mammals, 2,421 (4.2%) reptiles, and 75 (0.1%) amphibians. We identified patterns among taxonomic representation, reasons for presentation to a rehabilitation center, and animal disposition. Major causes of presentation were trauma (n = 22,156; 38.1%) and orphaning (n = 21,679; 37.3%), with habitat loss (n = 3,937; 6.8%), infectious disease (n = 1,824; 3.1%), and poisoning or toxin exposure (n = 806; 1.4%) playing lesser roles. The overall release rate for animals receiving care was 50.2% while 45.3% died or were euthanized during the rehabilitation process. A relatively small number (0.3%) were permanently non-releasable and placed in captivity; 4.1% had unknown outcomes. A comparable evaluation in 1989 revealed that wildlife submissions have increased (annual mean 12,583 vs 19,395), and are accompanied by a significant improvement in release (50.2% in the study period vs 44.4% in 1989) (χ2(1) = 90.43, p < 0.0001). In this manuscript, we aim to describe the rehabilitator community in New York State, and present the causes and outcomes for rehabilitation over a three-year period.
format article
author Melissa Hanson
Nicholas Hollingshead
Krysten Schuler
William F Siemer
Patrick Martin
Elizabeth M Bunting
author_facet Melissa Hanson
Nicholas Hollingshead
Krysten Schuler
William F Siemer
Patrick Martin
Elizabeth M Bunting
author_sort Melissa Hanson
title Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.
title_short Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.
title_full Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.
title_fullStr Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.
title_full_unstemmed Species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in New York State.
title_sort species, causes, and outcomes of wildlife rehabilitation in new york state.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7905cd28845940abab18885d3ad47dd6
work_keys_str_mv AT melissahanson speciescausesandoutcomesofwildliferehabilitationinnewyorkstate
AT nicholashollingshead speciescausesandoutcomesofwildliferehabilitationinnewyorkstate
AT krystenschuler speciescausesandoutcomesofwildliferehabilitationinnewyorkstate
AT williamfsiemer speciescausesandoutcomesofwildliferehabilitationinnewyorkstate
AT patrickmartin speciescausesandoutcomesofwildliferehabilitationinnewyorkstate
AT elizabethmbunting speciescausesandoutcomesofwildliferehabilitationinnewyorkstate
_version_ 1718374351586197504