Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect
Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most effective treatments for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) has also been demonstrated to be effective in ameliorating symptoms of neglect. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
MDPI AG
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae408 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae408 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae4082021-11-25T16:58:21ZPrism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect10.3390/brainsci111114882076-3425https://doaj.org/article/790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae4082021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1488https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3425Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most effective treatments for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) has also been demonstrated to be effective in ameliorating symptoms of neglect. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods in a group of neglect patients using a crossover design. A group of 13 post-acute brain-damaged patients with unilateral spatial neglect, who had never been rehabilitated, were treated using PA and OKS. Each treatment was applied for 10 sessions, twice a day, to all patients with both treatments in crossed order (i.e., PA followed by OKS or vice versa). Neuropsychological assessments were performed: before the first (T1), at the end of the first/beginning of the second (T2) and at the end of the second training sessions (T3), and two weeks after the end of treatment (T4). Both procedures produced a significant improvement in clinical tests at T2, independent of the type of training. The results suggest that either PA or OKS induces a significant amelioration of neglect in right brain-damaged patients, mainly in the first block of treatment. Since no differences between treatments were found, they could be applied in clinical practice, according to the requirements of the individual patient.Alessio FacchinGiusi FiglianoRoberta DainiMDPI AGarticleunilateral spatial neglectrehabilitationprism adaptationoptokinetic stimulationNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENBrain Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 1488, p 1488 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
unilateral spatial neglect rehabilitation prism adaptation optokinetic stimulation Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 |
spellingShingle |
unilateral spatial neglect rehabilitation prism adaptation optokinetic stimulation Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Alessio Facchin Giusi Figliano Roberta Daini Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect |
description |
Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most effective treatments for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) has also been demonstrated to be effective in ameliorating symptoms of neglect. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods in a group of neglect patients using a crossover design. A group of 13 post-acute brain-damaged patients with unilateral spatial neglect, who had never been rehabilitated, were treated using PA and OKS. Each treatment was applied for 10 sessions, twice a day, to all patients with both treatments in crossed order (i.e., PA followed by OKS or vice versa). Neuropsychological assessments were performed: before the first (T1), at the end of the first/beginning of the second (T2) and at the end of the second training sessions (T3), and two weeks after the end of treatment (T4). Both procedures produced a significant improvement in clinical tests at T2, independent of the type of training. The results suggest that either PA or OKS induces a significant amelioration of neglect in right brain-damaged patients, mainly in the first block of treatment. Since no differences between treatments were found, they could be applied in clinical practice, according to the requirements of the individual patient. |
format |
article |
author |
Alessio Facchin Giusi Figliano Roberta Daini |
author_facet |
Alessio Facchin Giusi Figliano Roberta Daini |
author_sort |
Alessio Facchin |
title |
Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect |
title_short |
Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect |
title_full |
Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect |
title_fullStr |
Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect |
title_full_unstemmed |
Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect |
title_sort |
prism adaptation and optokinetic stimulation comparison in the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae408 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT alessiofacchin prismadaptationandoptokineticstimulationcomparisonintherehabilitationofunilateralspatialneglect AT giusifigliano prismadaptationandoptokineticstimulationcomparisonintherehabilitationofunilateralspatialneglect AT robertadaini prismadaptationandoptokineticstimulationcomparisonintherehabilitationofunilateralspatialneglect |
_version_ |
1718412844509167616 |