Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect

Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most effective treatments for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) has also been demonstrated to be effective in ameliorating symptoms of neglect. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alessio Facchin, Giusi Figliano, Roberta Daini
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae408
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae408
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae4082021-11-25T16:58:21ZPrism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect10.3390/brainsci111114882076-3425https://doaj.org/article/790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae4082021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/11/11/1488https://doaj.org/toc/2076-3425Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most effective treatments for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) has also been demonstrated to be effective in ameliorating symptoms of neglect. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods in a group of neglect patients using a crossover design. A group of 13 post-acute brain-damaged patients with unilateral spatial neglect, who had never been rehabilitated, were treated using PA and OKS. Each treatment was applied for 10 sessions, twice a day, to all patients with both treatments in crossed order (i.e., PA followed by OKS or vice versa). Neuropsychological assessments were performed: before the first (T1), at the end of the first/beginning of the second (T2) and at the end of the second training sessions (T3), and two weeks after the end of treatment (T4). Both procedures produced a significant improvement in clinical tests at T2, independent of the type of training. The results suggest that either PA or OKS induces a significant amelioration of neglect in right brain-damaged patients, mainly in the first block of treatment. Since no differences between treatments were found, they could be applied in clinical practice, according to the requirements of the individual patient.Alessio FacchinGiusi FiglianoRoberta DainiMDPI AGarticleunilateral spatial neglectrehabilitationprism adaptationoptokinetic stimulationNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571ENBrain Sciences, Vol 11, Iss 1488, p 1488 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic unilateral spatial neglect
rehabilitation
prism adaptation
optokinetic stimulation
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
spellingShingle unilateral spatial neglect
rehabilitation
prism adaptation
optokinetic stimulation
Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
RC321-571
Alessio Facchin
Giusi Figliano
Roberta Daini
Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect
description Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most effective treatments for the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect. Optokinetic stimulation (OKS) has also been demonstrated to be effective in ameliorating symptoms of neglect. The aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of these two methods in a group of neglect patients using a crossover design. A group of 13 post-acute brain-damaged patients with unilateral spatial neglect, who had never been rehabilitated, were treated using PA and OKS. Each treatment was applied for 10 sessions, twice a day, to all patients with both treatments in crossed order (i.e., PA followed by OKS or vice versa). Neuropsychological assessments were performed: before the first (T1), at the end of the first/beginning of the second (T2) and at the end of the second training sessions (T3), and two weeks after the end of treatment (T4). Both procedures produced a significant improvement in clinical tests at T2, independent of the type of training. The results suggest that either PA or OKS induces a significant amelioration of neglect in right brain-damaged patients, mainly in the first block of treatment. Since no differences between treatments were found, they could be applied in clinical practice, according to the requirements of the individual patient.
format article
author Alessio Facchin
Giusi Figliano
Roberta Daini
author_facet Alessio Facchin
Giusi Figliano
Roberta Daini
author_sort Alessio Facchin
title Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect
title_short Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect
title_full Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect
title_fullStr Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect
title_full_unstemmed Prism Adaptation and Optokinetic Stimulation Comparison in the Rehabilitation of Unilateral Spatial Neglect
title_sort prism adaptation and optokinetic stimulation comparison in the rehabilitation of unilateral spatial neglect
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/790d67df7f6148e7a256c6a0907ae408
work_keys_str_mv AT alessiofacchin prismadaptationandoptokineticstimulationcomparisonintherehabilitationofunilateralspatialneglect
AT giusifigliano prismadaptationandoptokineticstimulationcomparisonintherehabilitationofunilateralspatialneglect
AT robertadaini prismadaptationandoptokineticstimulationcomparisonintherehabilitationofunilateralspatialneglect
_version_ 1718412844509167616