Is There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)

Social laterality in non-human primates has started to attract attention in recent years. The positioning of individuals during social interactions could possibly suggest the nature of a relationship and the social ranking of the subjects involved. The subjects of the present study were 12 adult <...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marzia Baldachini, Barbara Regaiolli, Miquel Llorente, David Riba, Caterina Spiezio
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7969bdd70085441abf7dfe8a22628519
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7969bdd70085441abf7dfe8a22628519
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7969bdd70085441abf7dfe8a226285192021-11-25T16:20:34ZIs There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)10.3390/ani111132882076-2615https://doaj.org/article/7969bdd70085441abf7dfe8a226285192021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/11/11/3288https://doaj.org/toc/2076-2615Social laterality in non-human primates has started to attract attention in recent years. The positioning of individuals during social interactions could possibly suggest the nature of a relationship and the social ranking of the subjects involved. The subjects of the present study were 12 adult <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>) housed in a zoological garden. We carried out fourteen 210-min video-recorded sessions and we used a focal animal sampling method to collect the position of the subjects during different social interactions. Data on the position of each macaque during three types of social interactions were collected (approach, proximity and affiliative contacts). Moreover, we focused on the outcomes of dyadic agonistic encounters to build the hierarchy of the colony. For each social interaction, two conditions were considered: the side preference (being kept on the left or on the right) and the sagittal preference (being kept in front or on the rear). Bouts of preference of different positions were collected for different social interactions (approach, proximity and contacts). No group-level side preferences were found for any social interaction, suggesting that both hemispheres might be complemental and balance each other during intraspecific communication. For the sagittal preference, we found a group-level bias for proximity, with macaques being kept in front rather than on the rear by close conspecifics. This might be due to the need to detect emotions and intentions of conspecifics. Moreover, high-ranking individuals are kept more frontally than on the rear when in proximity with other macaques. More studies are needed to better investigate social laterality, possibly distinguishing more categories of social interaction, and detecting other variables that might influence the positioning preferences.Marzia BaldachiniBarbara RegaiolliMiquel LlorenteDavid RibaCaterina SpiezioMDPI AGarticle<i>Barbary macaques</i>lateralityapproachproximityaffiliative contactssocial hierarchyVeterinary medicineSF600-1100ZoologyQL1-991ENAnimals, Vol 11, Iss 3288, p 3288 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic <i>Barbary macaques</i>
laterality
approach
proximity
affiliative contacts
social hierarchy
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
spellingShingle <i>Barbary macaques</i>
laterality
approach
proximity
affiliative contacts
social hierarchy
Veterinary medicine
SF600-1100
Zoology
QL1-991
Marzia Baldachini
Barbara Regaiolli
Miquel Llorente
David Riba
Caterina Spiezio
Is There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)
description Social laterality in non-human primates has started to attract attention in recent years. The positioning of individuals during social interactions could possibly suggest the nature of a relationship and the social ranking of the subjects involved. The subjects of the present study were 12 adult <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>) housed in a zoological garden. We carried out fourteen 210-min video-recorded sessions and we used a focal animal sampling method to collect the position of the subjects during different social interactions. Data on the position of each macaque during three types of social interactions were collected (approach, proximity and affiliative contacts). Moreover, we focused on the outcomes of dyadic agonistic encounters to build the hierarchy of the colony. For each social interaction, two conditions were considered: the side preference (being kept on the left or on the right) and the sagittal preference (being kept in front or on the rear). Bouts of preference of different positions were collected for different social interactions (approach, proximity and contacts). No group-level side preferences were found for any social interaction, suggesting that both hemispheres might be complemental and balance each other during intraspecific communication. For the sagittal preference, we found a group-level bias for proximity, with macaques being kept in front rather than on the rear by close conspecifics. This might be due to the need to detect emotions and intentions of conspecifics. Moreover, high-ranking individuals are kept more frontally than on the rear when in proximity with other macaques. More studies are needed to better investigate social laterality, possibly distinguishing more categories of social interaction, and detecting other variables that might influence the positioning preferences.
format article
author Marzia Baldachini
Barbara Regaiolli
Miquel Llorente
David Riba
Caterina Spiezio
author_facet Marzia Baldachini
Barbara Regaiolli
Miquel Llorente
David Riba
Caterina Spiezio
author_sort Marzia Baldachini
title Is There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)
title_short Is There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)
title_full Is There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)
title_fullStr Is There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)
title_full_unstemmed Is There a “Right” Side of Communicating Friendship? Lateralization of Social Interactions in Zoo <i>Barbary macaques</i> (<i>Macaca sylvanus</i>)
title_sort is there a “right” side of communicating friendship? lateralization of social interactions in zoo <i>barbary macaques</i> (<i>macaca sylvanus</i>)
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7969bdd70085441abf7dfe8a22628519
work_keys_str_mv AT marziabaldachini istherearightsideofcommunicatingfriendshiplateralizationofsocialinteractionsinzooibarbarymacaquesiimacacasylvanusi
AT barbararegaiolli istherearightsideofcommunicatingfriendshiplateralizationofsocialinteractionsinzooibarbarymacaquesiimacacasylvanusi
AT miquelllorente istherearightsideofcommunicatingfriendshiplateralizationofsocialinteractionsinzooibarbarymacaquesiimacacasylvanusi
AT davidriba istherearightsideofcommunicatingfriendshiplateralizationofsocialinteractionsinzooibarbarymacaquesiimacacasylvanusi
AT caterinaspiezio istherearightsideofcommunicatingfriendshiplateralizationofsocialinteractionsinzooibarbarymacaquesiimacacasylvanusi
_version_ 1718413208096604160