EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS

Objective: The purpose of the trial is to comparatively analyze an electronic, pressure-calibrated probe third generation Parometer (Orange) and a standard, manual measurement probe WHO 621 (C type) in the context of taking periodontal variables when assessing periodontal status in childhood. Mate...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hristina Tankova, Zornitsa Lazarova, Maya Rashkova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Peytchinski Publishing 2021
Materias:	gingivitis gingival sulcus periodontal indices Dentistry RK1-715 Medicine (General) R5-920
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7983a730cf5c4a2587fd417076ddcdc6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7983a730cf5c4a2587fd417076ddcdc6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7983a730cf5c4a2587fd417076ddcdc62021-11-13T05:54:41ZEVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS10.5272/jimab.2021274.40871312-773Xhttps://doaj.org/article/7983a730cf5c4a2587fd417076ddcdc62021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.journal-imab-bg.org/issues-2021/issue4/2021vol27-issue4-4087-4091.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1312-773XObjective: The purpose of the trial is to comparatively analyze an electronic, pressure-calibrated probe third generation Parometer (Orange) and a standard, manual measurement probe WHO 621 (C type) in the context of taking periodontal variables when assessing periodontal status in childhood. Materials and methods: The subject of the study were 28 children aged between 12 and 14 years (12 boys and 16 girls). All patients were clinically examined, and the data were recorded on a specially prepared card. The recorded clinical variables contain: Assessment of oral hygiene habits (type of toothbrush, frequency of brushing); OHI as per Green Vermillion; Registration of dental status; Depth of gingival sulcus (on all teeth) with both types of probes; BOP (bleeding on probing), percentage of bleeding units with both types of probes; Taking into account the complete time needed to take the findings and the sensation of pain experienced by a digital rank scale during probing. Results and conclusion: The average depth of gingival sulcus measured with a mechanical periodontal probe was 1.62 mm, and with an electronic one - 1.38 mm (p <0.05). Values for BOP with both types of probes showed an average of 0.30 ± 0.29, which is 30% of all bleeding units examined (p> 0.05). The time for recording the periodontal indices with both probes is, on average, 10 minutes. In both probes, the discomfort of about grade 4 was observed according to the ranking scale used to read sensitivity (p <0.05). There is a more pronounced sensitivity when using an electronic periodontal probe.Hristina TankovaZornitsa LazarovaMaya RashkovaPeytchinski Publishingarticlegingivitisgingival sulcusperiodontal indicesDentistryRK1-715Medicine (General)R5-920ENJournal of IMAB, Vol 27, Iss 4, Pp 4087-4091 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	gingivitis gingival sulcus periodontal indices Dentistry RK1-715 Medicine (General) R5-920
spellingShingle	gingivitis gingival sulcus periodontal indices Dentistry RK1-715 Medicine (General) R5-920 Hristina Tankova Zornitsa Lazarova Maya Rashkova EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS
description	Objective: The purpose of the trial is to comparatively analyze an electronic, pressure-calibrated probe third generation Parometer (Orange) and a standard, manual measurement probe WHO 621 (C type) in the context of taking periodontal variables when assessing periodontal status in childhood. Materials and methods: The subject of the study were 28 children aged between 12 and 14 years (12 boys and 16 girls). All patients were clinically examined, and the data were recorded on a specially prepared card. The recorded clinical variables contain: Assessment of oral hygiene habits (type of toothbrush, frequency of brushing); OHI as per Green Vermillion; Registration of dental status; Depth of gingival sulcus (on all teeth) with both types of probes; BOP (bleeding on probing), percentage of bleeding units with both types of probes; Taking into account the complete time needed to take the findings and the sensation of pain experienced by a digital rank scale during probing. Results and conclusion: The average depth of gingival sulcus measured with a mechanical periodontal probe was 1.62 mm, and with an electronic one - 1.38 mm (p <0.05). Values for BOP with both types of probes showed an average of 0.30 ± 0.29, which is 30% of all bleeding units examined (p> 0.05). The time for recording the periodontal indices with both probes is, on average, 10 minutes. In both probes, the discomfort of about grade 4 was observed according to the ranking scale used to read sensitivity (p <0.05). There is a more pronounced sensitivity when using an electronic periodontal probe.
format	article
author	Hristina Tankova Zornitsa Lazarova Maya Rashkova
author_facet	Hristina Tankova Zornitsa Lazarova Maya Rashkova
author_sort	Hristina Tankova
title	EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS
title_short	EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS
title_full	EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS
title_fullStr	EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS
title_full_unstemmed	EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS
title_sort	evaluation of an electronic periodontal probe versus a manual probe in the periodontal diagnosis of children aged 12-14 years
publisher	Peytchinski Publishing
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7983a730cf5c4a2587fd417076ddcdc6
work_keys_str_mv	AT hristinatankova evaluationofanelectronicperiodontalprobeversusamanualprobeintheperiodontaldiagnosisofchildrenaged1214years AT zornitsalazarova evaluationofanelectronicperiodontalprobeversusamanualprobeintheperiodontaldiagnosisofchildrenaged1214years AT mayarashkova evaluationofanelectronicperiodontalprobeversusamanualprobeintheperiodontaldiagnosisofchildrenaged1214years
_version_	1718430264072339456

EVALUATION OF AN ELECTRONIC PERIODONTAL PROBE VERSUS A MANUAL PROBE IN THE PERIODONTAL DIAGNOSIS OF CHILDREN AGED 12-14 YEARS

Ejemplares similares