Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes

Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring has revolutionized the way biodiversity is surveyed and has been proposed as a reliable method to inform management decisions. Recognition of eDNA techniques as reliable tools to inform management and biosecurity require stringent standards to assess samp...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alejandro Trujillo‐González, Cecilia Villacorta‐Rath, Nicole E. White, Elise M. Furlan, Mark Sykes, Geoff Grossel, Uday K. Divi, Dianne Gleeson
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/799068d8969941fbbd1f1e870723348b
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:799068d8969941fbbd1f1e870723348b
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:799068d8969941fbbd1f1e870723348b2021-11-23T16:15:24ZConsiderations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes2637-494310.1002/edn3.243https://doaj.org/article/799068d8969941fbbd1f1e870723348b2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.243https://doaj.org/toc/2637-4943Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring has revolutionized the way biodiversity is surveyed and has been proposed as a reliable method to inform management decisions. Recognition of eDNA techniques as reliable tools to inform management and biosecurity require stringent standards to assess sample quality and reliability of results. Laboratories can have their workflows assessed and certified through accreditation and be involved in proficiency testing schemes provided to test the accuracy and precision of molecular methods. Currently, there is only one eDNA‐based proficiency testing scheme designed to test competency of laboratories in amplifying eDNA from the Great Crested Newt, Triturus cristatus (Laurenti, 1768) in water samples. This test, however, is a closed scheme currently run by invitation only to laboratories in the United Kingdom. Given the paucity of eDNA‐based proficiency schemes to ensure high‐quality services, this commentary discusses how future proficiency testing schemes could be designed to assess eDNA sample quality and reliability on detection results for environmental management and biosecurity applications. We discuss the use of tissue‐derived and synthetic oligonucleotides as reference materials, the need for proficiency testing schemes to assess the capacity of analytical facilities to determine sample quality as well as accurately detecting trace eDNA in blind samples and discuss the context in which fit for purpose eDNA testing schemes could be designed. To complement the future development of eDNA proficiency testing schemes, we provide firsthand accounts and lessons learned while developing the current Great Crested Newt eDNA proficiency scheme. Lastly, we highlight current limitations in standardizing rapidly improving eDNA‐based techniques and discuss disadvantages to accreditation and standardization from an Australian‐centered perspective as a means to promote an active debate on the topic of future eDNA accreditation and proficiency testing.Alejandro Trujillo‐GonzálezCecilia Villacorta‐RathNicole E. WhiteElise M. FurlanMark SykesGeoff GrosselUday K. DiviDianne GleesonWileyarticleaccreditationInternational standardInternational Organization for AccreditationmonitoringsurveillanceEnvironmental sciencesGE1-350Microbial ecologyQR100-130ENEnvironmental DNA, Vol 3, Iss 6, Pp 1049-1058 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic accreditation
International standard
International Organization for Accreditation
monitoring
surveillance
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Microbial ecology
QR100-130
spellingShingle accreditation
International standard
International Organization for Accreditation
monitoring
surveillance
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Microbial ecology
QR100-130
Alejandro Trujillo‐González
Cecilia Villacorta‐Rath
Nicole E. White
Elise M. Furlan
Mark Sykes
Geoff Grossel
Uday K. Divi
Dianne Gleeson
Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes
description Abstract Environmental DNA (eDNA) monitoring has revolutionized the way biodiversity is surveyed and has been proposed as a reliable method to inform management decisions. Recognition of eDNA techniques as reliable tools to inform management and biosecurity require stringent standards to assess sample quality and reliability of results. Laboratories can have their workflows assessed and certified through accreditation and be involved in proficiency testing schemes provided to test the accuracy and precision of molecular methods. Currently, there is only one eDNA‐based proficiency testing scheme designed to test competency of laboratories in amplifying eDNA from the Great Crested Newt, Triturus cristatus (Laurenti, 1768) in water samples. This test, however, is a closed scheme currently run by invitation only to laboratories in the United Kingdom. Given the paucity of eDNA‐based proficiency schemes to ensure high‐quality services, this commentary discusses how future proficiency testing schemes could be designed to assess eDNA sample quality and reliability on detection results for environmental management and biosecurity applications. We discuss the use of tissue‐derived and synthetic oligonucleotides as reference materials, the need for proficiency testing schemes to assess the capacity of analytical facilities to determine sample quality as well as accurately detecting trace eDNA in blind samples and discuss the context in which fit for purpose eDNA testing schemes could be designed. To complement the future development of eDNA proficiency testing schemes, we provide firsthand accounts and lessons learned while developing the current Great Crested Newt eDNA proficiency scheme. Lastly, we highlight current limitations in standardizing rapidly improving eDNA‐based techniques and discuss disadvantages to accreditation and standardization from an Australian‐centered perspective as a means to promote an active debate on the topic of future eDNA accreditation and proficiency testing.
format article
author Alejandro Trujillo‐González
Cecilia Villacorta‐Rath
Nicole E. White
Elise M. Furlan
Mark Sykes
Geoff Grossel
Uday K. Divi
Dianne Gleeson
author_facet Alejandro Trujillo‐González
Cecilia Villacorta‐Rath
Nicole E. White
Elise M. Furlan
Mark Sykes
Geoff Grossel
Uday K. Divi
Dianne Gleeson
author_sort Alejandro Trujillo‐González
title Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes
title_short Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes
title_full Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes
title_fullStr Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes
title_full_unstemmed Considerations for future environmental DNA accreditation and proficiency testing schemes
title_sort considerations for future environmental dna accreditation and proficiency testing schemes
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/799068d8969941fbbd1f1e870723348b
work_keys_str_mv AT alejandrotrujillogonzalez considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
AT ceciliavillacortarath considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
AT nicoleewhite considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
AT elisemfurlan considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
AT marksykes considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
AT geoffgrossel considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
AT udaykdivi considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
AT diannegleeson considerationsforfutureenvironmentaldnaaccreditationandproficiencytestingschemes
_version_ 1718416216737972224