Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data

Abstract Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of the RECOURSE randomized clinical trial (RCT) established two categories, a good prognosis corresponding to subjects having a low tumor...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ana Fernández Montes, Alberto Carmona-Bayonas, Paula Jimenez-Fonseca, Francisca Vázquez Rivera, Nieves Martinez Lago, Marta Covela Rúa, Antía Cousillas Castiñeiras, Paula Gonzalez Villarroel, Juan De la Cámara Gómez, José Carlos Méndez Méndez, Carmen Carriles Fernández, Manuel Sanchez Cánovas, Teresa Garcia García
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/79955248229f4b8ab9ff4d86bc53b994
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:79955248229f4b8ab9ff4d86bc53b994
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:79955248229f4b8ab9ff4d86bc53b9942021-12-02T16:08:07ZPrediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data10.1038/s41598-021-93732-52045-2322https://doaj.org/article/79955248229f4b8ab9ff4d86bc53b9942021-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-93732-5https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of the RECOURSE randomized clinical trial (RCT) established two categories, a good prognosis corresponding to subjects having a low tumor burden and indolent disease. Other models in refractory mCRC are the FAS-CORRECT and Colon Life nomogram. The main objective was to externally validate the prognostic factors of the RECOURSE and FAS-CORRECT trials, and the Colon Life nomogram in a multicenter, real-world series of mCRC treated in 3rd and successive lines with trifluridine/tipiracil. The secondary aim was to develop an OS predictive model, TAS-RECOSMO. Between 2016 and 2019, 244 patients were recruited. Median OS was 8.15 vs 8.12 months for the poor (85% of the subjects) and good (15%) prognosis groups from the RESOURCE trial, respectively, log-rank p = 0.9. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (17%), asthenia (6%), and anemia (5%). The AFT lognormal model TAS-RECOSMO included six variables: ECOG-PS, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation status, time between diagnosis of metastasis and beginning of trifluridine/tipiracil, NLR, CEA, and alkaline phosphatase. The model’s bootstrapped bias-corrected c-index was 0.682 (95% CI, 0.636–0.722). The factors from the Colon Life model, FAS-CORRECT, and RECOURSE displayed a c-index of 0.690, 0.630, and 0.507, respectively. TAS-RECOSMO, FAS-CORRECT, and the Colon Life nomogram appear to predict OS in patients with refractory mCCR who begin trifluridine/tipiracil treatment in the real world. The prognostic groups of the RECOURCE RCT were unable to capture the situation of real-world subjects treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in this series.Ana Fernández MontesAlberto Carmona-BayonasPaula Jimenez-FonsecaFrancisca Vázquez RiveraNieves Martinez LagoMarta Covela RúaAntía Cousillas CastiñeirasPaula Gonzalez VillarroelJuan De la Cámara GómezJosé Carlos Méndez MéndezCarmen Carriles FernándezManuel Sanchez CánovasTeresa Garcia GarcíaNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-10 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ana Fernández Montes
Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
Francisca Vázquez Rivera
Nieves Martinez Lago
Marta Covela Rúa
Antía Cousillas Castiñeiras
Paula Gonzalez Villarroel
Juan De la Cámara Gómez
José Carlos Méndez Méndez
Carmen Carriles Fernández
Manuel Sanchez Cánovas
Teresa Garcia García
Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data
description Abstract Trifluridine/tipiracil increases overall survival (OS) in patients with refractory, metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). A post hoc exploratory analysis of the RECOURSE randomized clinical trial (RCT) established two categories, a good prognosis corresponding to subjects having a low tumor burden and indolent disease. Other models in refractory mCRC are the FAS-CORRECT and Colon Life nomogram. The main objective was to externally validate the prognostic factors of the RECOURSE and FAS-CORRECT trials, and the Colon Life nomogram in a multicenter, real-world series of mCRC treated in 3rd and successive lines with trifluridine/tipiracil. The secondary aim was to develop an OS predictive model, TAS-RECOSMO. Between 2016 and 2019, 244 patients were recruited. Median OS was 8.15 vs 8.12 months for the poor (85% of the subjects) and good (15%) prognosis groups from the RESOURCE trial, respectively, log-rank p = 0.9. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (17%), asthenia (6%), and anemia (5%). The AFT lognormal model TAS-RECOSMO included six variables: ECOG-PS, KRAS/NRAS/BRAF mutation status, time between diagnosis of metastasis and beginning of trifluridine/tipiracil, NLR, CEA, and alkaline phosphatase. The model’s bootstrapped bias-corrected c-index was 0.682 (95% CI, 0.636–0.722). The factors from the Colon Life model, FAS-CORRECT, and RECOURSE displayed a c-index of 0.690, 0.630, and 0.507, respectively. TAS-RECOSMO, FAS-CORRECT, and the Colon Life nomogram appear to predict OS in patients with refractory mCCR who begin trifluridine/tipiracil treatment in the real world. The prognostic groups of the RECOURCE RCT were unable to capture the situation of real-world subjects treated with trifluridine/tipiracil in this series.
format article
author Ana Fernández Montes
Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
Francisca Vázquez Rivera
Nieves Martinez Lago
Marta Covela Rúa
Antía Cousillas Castiñeiras
Paula Gonzalez Villarroel
Juan De la Cámara Gómez
José Carlos Méndez Méndez
Carmen Carriles Fernández
Manuel Sanchez Cánovas
Teresa Garcia García
author_facet Ana Fernández Montes
Alberto Carmona-Bayonas
Paula Jimenez-Fonseca
Francisca Vázquez Rivera
Nieves Martinez Lago
Marta Covela Rúa
Antía Cousillas Castiñeiras
Paula Gonzalez Villarroel
Juan De la Cámara Gómez
José Carlos Méndez Méndez
Carmen Carriles Fernández
Manuel Sanchez Cánovas
Teresa Garcia García
author_sort Ana Fernández Montes
title Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data
title_short Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data
title_full Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data
title_fullStr Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data
title_full_unstemmed Prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data
title_sort prediction of survival in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer in treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil: real-world vs clinical trial data
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/79955248229f4b8ab9ff4d86bc53b994
work_keys_str_mv AT anafernandezmontes predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT albertocarmonabayonas predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT paulajimenezfonseca predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT franciscavazquezrivera predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT nievesmartinezlago predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT martacovelarua predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT antiacousillascastineiras predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT paulagonzalezvillarroel predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT juandelacamaragomez predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT josecarlosmendezmendez predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT carmencarrilesfernandez predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT manuelsanchezcanovas predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
AT teresagarciagarcia predictionofsurvivalinpatientswithadvancedrefractorycolorectalcancerintreatmentwithtrifluridinetipiracilrealworldvsclinicaltrialdata
_version_ 1718384605188325376