Køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen
Very often, the medieval view on "gender" and "body" is depicted either unequivocally negative or just equivocal. According to this simplistic picture, a number of medieval men and women have been portrayed as alternately extremely misogynist and extremely submissive and self-sup...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | DA EN NB SV |
| Publicado: |
The Royal Danish Library
1997
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7a659078fa8e40afb8d3d30aaf9a7735 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7a659078fa8e40afb8d3d30aaf9a7735 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7a659078fa8e40afb8d3d30aaf9a77352021-12-01T00:11:53ZKøn, krop og ånd i middelalderen10.7146/kkf.v0i3.284822245-6937https://doaj.org/article/7a659078fa8e40afb8d3d30aaf9a77351997-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://tidsskrift.dk/KKF/article/view/28482https://doaj.org/toc/2245-6937Very often, the medieval view on "gender" and "body" is depicted either unequivocally negative or just equivocal. According to this simplistic picture, a number of medieval men and women have been portrayed as alternately extremely misogynist and extremely submissive and self-suppressing. With the examples of Bernard of Clairvaux, Beatrice of Nazareth, Mechtild of Hackeborn, and Gertrud of Helfta, this article tries to differentiate more subtly the perception of the concepts "woman/female" and "man/male" by pointing to their function as symbols within the Christian tradition. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the view on body/soul is not an expression of simple dualism.Else Marie Wiberg PedersenThe Royal Danish LibraryarticleSocial SciencesHDAENNBSVKvinder, Køn & Forskning, Iss 3 (1997) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
DA EN NB SV |
| topic |
Social Sciences H |
| spellingShingle |
Social Sciences H Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen Køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen |
| description |
Very often, the medieval view on "gender" and "body" is depicted either unequivocally negative or just equivocal. According to this simplistic picture, a number of medieval men and women have been portrayed as alternately extremely misogynist and extremely submissive and self-suppressing. With the examples of Bernard of Clairvaux, Beatrice of Nazareth, Mechtild of Hackeborn, and Gertrud of Helfta, this article tries to differentiate more subtly the perception of the concepts "woman/female" and "man/male" by pointing to their function as symbols within the Christian tradition. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that the view on body/soul is not an expression of simple dualism. |
| format |
article |
| author |
Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen |
| author_facet |
Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen |
| author_sort |
Else Marie Wiberg Pedersen |
| title |
Køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen |
| title_short |
Køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen |
| title_full |
Køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen |
| title_fullStr |
Køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen |
| title_sort |
køn, krop og ånd i middelalderen |
| publisher |
The Royal Danish Library |
| publishDate |
1997 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/7a659078fa8e40afb8d3d30aaf9a7735 |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT elsemariewibergpedersen kønkropogandimiddelalderen |
| _version_ |
1718406029162577920 |