The Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century
The article is focused on the evolution of geopolitical arrangements that had initially materialized in the concluding quarter of the twentieth century and had given birth to the contemporary world politics paradigm including the growing role of Russia. The present author maintains that the very pro...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Lenguaje: | EN RU |
| Publicado: |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)
2019
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7a92a79a797841c38397ee165224570a |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
| id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7a92a79a797841c38397ee165224570a |
|---|---|
| record_format |
dspace |
| spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7a92a79a797841c38397ee165224570a2021-11-07T14:45:03ZThe Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century2542-02402587-932410.23932/2542-0240-2019-12-4-6-31https://doaj.org/article/7a92a79a797841c38397ee165224570a2019-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ogt-journal.com/jour/article/view/500https://doaj.org/toc/2542-0240https://doaj.org/toc/2587-9324The article is focused on the evolution of geopolitical arrangements that had initially materialized in the concluding quarter of the twentieth century and had given birth to the contemporary world politics paradigm including the growing role of Russia. The present author maintains that the very process of History is objective (i.e. independent of political establishment’s likes and dislikes) and continuous. This point is argued by appeal to various academic sources, among them the works of Russian and foreign historians, economists, philosophers, political scientists and futurologists. The dismemberment of the U.S.S.R. and collapse of bipolar world suspended, for a short while only, the developments at the sunset of the twentieth century. “Truncated” globalization resulted in “reactive” accumulation of controversies both between the North Atlantic “supercivilization” and the “rest” and within societies that emerged victorious after the cold war. The new vulnerabilities consisted of: deindustrialization as a sideeffect of globalization, “orientalization” of western societies as part and parcel of massive migration inflows from the South, political and economic decline encouraged by disappearance of powerful “countercentre”embodied by the Soviet Union, waning of economically active population under existent demographic trends throughout the West, etc. Instrumental of cold war revision have also been: emergence of radical antiWest megaprojects like the “Islamic State”, gaining strength by the erstwhile “new influentials” as well as revival of Russia as an omnipotent world power. Nowadays, Pax Americana has become inefficient to be substituted by a new and workable global consensus on universal collective security system that meets the basic requirements of contemporary multipolar world.A. G. VolodinАссоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”)article“end of history”new influentialsussrusawashington consensustruncated globalization“orientalization” of the westsplit of civilizationantiglobalismturbocapitalismpolycentric world systemnew global consensush. mcraech. kindlebergerw.w. rostowb.r. nayarp. buchananInternational relationsJZ2-6530ENRUКонтуры глобальных трансформаций: политика, экономика, право, Vol 12, Iss 4, Pp 6-31 (2019) |
| institution |
DOAJ |
| collection |
DOAJ |
| language |
EN RU |
| topic |
“end of history” new influentials ussr usa washington consensus truncated globalization “orientalization” of the west split of civilization antiglobalism turbocapitalism polycentric world system new global consensus h. mcrae ch. kindleberger w.w. rostow b.r. nayar p. buchanan International relations JZ2-6530 |
| spellingShingle |
“end of history” new influentials ussr usa washington consensus truncated globalization “orientalization” of the west split of civilization antiglobalism turbocapitalism polycentric world system new global consensus h. mcrae ch. kindleberger w.w. rostow b.r. nayar p. buchanan International relations JZ2-6530 A. G. Volodin The Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century |
| description |
The article is focused on the evolution of geopolitical arrangements that had initially materialized in the concluding quarter of the twentieth century and had given birth to the contemporary world politics paradigm including the growing role of Russia. The present author maintains that the very process of History is objective (i.e. independent of political establishment’s likes and dislikes) and continuous. This point is argued by appeal to various academic sources, among them the works of Russian and foreign historians, economists, philosophers, political scientists and futurologists. The dismemberment of the U.S.S.R. and collapse of bipolar world suspended, for a short while only, the developments at the sunset of the twentieth century. “Truncated” globalization resulted in “reactive” accumulation of controversies both between the North Atlantic “supercivilization” and the “rest” and within societies that emerged victorious after the cold war. The new vulnerabilities consisted of: deindustrialization as a sideeffect of globalization, “orientalization” of western societies as part and parcel of massive migration inflows from the South, political and economic decline encouraged by disappearance of powerful “countercentre”embodied by the Soviet Union, waning of economically active population under existent demographic trends throughout the West, etc. Instrumental of cold war revision have also been: emergence of radical antiWest megaprojects like the “Islamic State”, gaining strength by the erstwhile “new influentials” as well as revival of Russia as an omnipotent world power. Nowadays, Pax Americana has become inefficient to be substituted by a new and workable global consensus on universal collective security system that meets the basic requirements of contemporary multipolar world. |
| format |
article |
| author |
A. G. Volodin |
| author_facet |
A. G. Volodin |
| author_sort |
A. G. Volodin |
| title |
The Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century |
| title_short |
The Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century |
| title_full |
The Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century |
| title_fullStr |
The Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century |
| title_full_unstemmed |
The Formation of the Polycentric World Order as a Continuation of the Geopolitical Processes of the Twentieth Century |
| title_sort |
formation of the polycentric world order as a continuation of the geopolitical processes of the twentieth century |
| publisher |
Ассоциация независимых экспертов «Центр изучения кризисного общества» (in English: Association for independent experts “Center for Crisis Society Studies”) |
| publishDate |
2019 |
| url |
https://doaj.org/article/7a92a79a797841c38397ee165224570a |
| work_keys_str_mv |
AT agvolodin theformationofthepolycentricworldorderasacontinuationofthegeopoliticalprocessesofthetwentiethcentury AT agvolodin formationofthepolycentricworldorderasacontinuationofthegeopoliticalprocessesofthetwentiethcentury |
| _version_ |
1718443363681697792 |