Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement

In this short paper I survey recent contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement raised by contemporary relativists. After making the challenge vivid by means of a working example, I specify the notion of disagreement lying at the heart of the challenge. The answers are grouped in three...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Dan Zeman
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN FR IT
Publicado:	Rosenberg & Sellier 2017
Materias:	contextualism disagreement disagreement in attitude pragmatic disagreement Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7aa4f2a5eb3540069dff6d9ca805ea86
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7aa4f2a5eb3540069dff6d9ca805ea86
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7aa4f2a5eb3540069dff6d9ca805ea862021-12-02T12:05:58ZContextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement10.13128/Phe_Mi-211062280-78532239-4028https://doaj.org/article/7aa4f2a5eb3540069dff6d9ca805ea862017-08-01T00:00:00Zhttps://oaj.fupress.net/index.php/pam/article/view/7266https://doaj.org/toc/2280-7853https://doaj.org/toc/2239-4028 In this short paper I survey recent contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement raised by contemporary relativists. After making the challenge vivid by means of a working example, I specify the notion of disagreement lying at the heart of the challenge. The answers are grouped in three categories, the first characterized by rejecting the intuition of disagreement in certain cases, the second by conceiving disagreement as a clash of non-cognitive attitudes and the third by relegating disagreement at the pragmatic level. For each category I present several important variants and raise some (general) criticisms. The paper is meant to offer a quick introduction to the current contextualist literature on disagreement and thus a useful tool for further research. Dan ZemanRosenberg & Sellierarticlecontextualismdisagreementdisagreement in attitudepragmatic disagreementAestheticsBH1-301EthicsBJ1-1725ENFRITPhenomenology and Mind, Iss 12 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN FR IT
topic	contextualism disagreement disagreement in attitude pragmatic disagreement Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725
spellingShingle	contextualism disagreement disagreement in attitude pragmatic disagreement Aesthetics BH1-301 Ethics BJ1-1725 Dan Zeman Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
description	In this short paper I survey recent contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement raised by contemporary relativists. After making the challenge vivid by means of a working example, I specify the notion of disagreement lying at the heart of the challenge. The answers are grouped in three categories, the first characterized by rejecting the intuition of disagreement in certain cases, the second by conceiving disagreement as a clash of non-cognitive attitudes and the third by relegating disagreement at the pragmatic level. For each category I present several important variants and raise some (general) criticisms. The paper is meant to offer a quick introduction to the current contextualist literature on disagreement and thus a useful tool for further research.
format	article
author	Dan Zeman
author_facet	Dan Zeman
author_sort	Dan Zeman
title	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_short	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_full	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_fullStr	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_full_unstemmed	Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement
title_sort	contextualist answers to the challenge from disagreement
publisher	Rosenberg & Sellier
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/7aa4f2a5eb3540069dff6d9ca805ea86
work_keys_str_mv	AT danzeman contextualistanswerstothechallengefromdisagreement
_version_	1718394698194747392

Contextualist Answers to the Challenge from Disagreement

Ejemplares similares