Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition

The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility and compare the outcomes of two 3D voxel-based superimposition techniques for craniofacial CBCT images, using anterior cranial base areas of different extent as references. Fifteen preexisting pairs of serial CBCTs (initial age: 11.7 ±...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammed Ghamri, Georgios Kanavakis, Nikolaos Gkantidis
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: MDPI AG 2021
Materias:
R
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7af62481a5c6450d810497cc3f0008c3
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7af62481a5c6450d810497cc3f0008c3
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7af62481a5c6450d810497cc3f0008c32021-11-25T18:02:43ZReliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition10.3390/jcm102254292077-0383https://doaj.org/article/7af62481a5c6450d810497cc3f0008c32021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/22/5429https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility and compare the outcomes of two 3D voxel-based superimposition techniques for craniofacial CBCT images, using anterior cranial base areas of different extent as references. Fifteen preexisting pairs of serial CBCTs (initial age: 11.7 ± 0.6 years; interval: 1.7 ± 0.4 years) were superimposed on total anterior cranial base (TACB) or middle anterior cranial base (MACB) structures through the Dolphin 3D software. The overlap of the reference structures was assessed visually to indicate reliability. All superimpositions were repeated by the same investigator. Outcomes were compared to assess the agreement between the two methods. Reliability was perfect for the TACB and moderate for the MACB method (<i>p</i> = 0.044). Both areas showed good overall reproducibility, though in individual cases there were notable differences for MACB superimpositions, ranging from −1.84 to 1.64 mm (TACB range: −0.48 to 0.31 mm). The overall agreement in the detected T0/T1 changes was also good, though it was significantly reduced for individual measurements (median < 0.01 mm, IQR: 0.46 mm, range: −2.81 to 0.73 mm). In conclusion, the voxel-based superimposition on TACB was more reliable and showed higher reproducibility than the superimposition on MACB. Thus, the extended anterior cranial base area is recommended for the assessment of craniofacial changes.Mohammed GhamriGeorgios KanavakisNikolaos GkantidisMDPI AGarticleimagingthree-dimensionalcone-beam computed tomographyvoxel-based superimpositionanterior cranial baseMedicineRENJournal of Clinical Medicine, Vol 10, Iss 5429, p 5429 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic imaging
three-dimensional
cone-beam computed tomography
voxel-based superimposition
anterior cranial base
Medicine
R
spellingShingle imaging
three-dimensional
cone-beam computed tomography
voxel-based superimposition
anterior cranial base
Medicine
R
Mohammed Ghamri
Georgios Kanavakis
Nikolaos Gkantidis
Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition
description The study aimed to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility and compare the outcomes of two 3D voxel-based superimposition techniques for craniofacial CBCT images, using anterior cranial base areas of different extent as references. Fifteen preexisting pairs of serial CBCTs (initial age: 11.7 ± 0.6 years; interval: 1.7 ± 0.4 years) were superimposed on total anterior cranial base (TACB) or middle anterior cranial base (MACB) structures through the Dolphin 3D software. The overlap of the reference structures was assessed visually to indicate reliability. All superimpositions were repeated by the same investigator. Outcomes were compared to assess the agreement between the two methods. Reliability was perfect for the TACB and moderate for the MACB method (<i>p</i> = 0.044). Both areas showed good overall reproducibility, though in individual cases there were notable differences for MACB superimpositions, ranging from −1.84 to 1.64 mm (TACB range: −0.48 to 0.31 mm). The overall agreement in the detected T0/T1 changes was also good, though it was significantly reduced for individual measurements (median < 0.01 mm, IQR: 0.46 mm, range: −2.81 to 0.73 mm). In conclusion, the voxel-based superimposition on TACB was more reliable and showed higher reproducibility than the superimposition on MACB. Thus, the extended anterior cranial base area is recommended for the assessment of craniofacial changes.
format article
author Mohammed Ghamri
Georgios Kanavakis
Nikolaos Gkantidis
author_facet Mohammed Ghamri
Georgios Kanavakis
Nikolaos Gkantidis
author_sort Mohammed Ghamri
title Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition
title_short Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition
title_full Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition
title_fullStr Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of Different Anterior Cranial Base Reference Areas for Voxel-Based Superimposition
title_sort reliability of different anterior cranial base reference areas for voxel-based superimposition
publisher MDPI AG
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7af62481a5c6450d810497cc3f0008c3
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammedghamri reliabilityofdifferentanteriorcranialbasereferenceareasforvoxelbasedsuperimposition
AT georgioskanavakis reliabilityofdifferentanteriorcranialbasereferenceareasforvoxelbasedsuperimposition
AT nikolaosgkantidis reliabilityofdifferentanteriorcranialbasereferenceareasforvoxelbasedsuperimposition
_version_ 1718411687629946880