Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points

Koyo Hashijiri,1 Yuichiro Watanabe,1 Naoki Fukui,1 Takaharu Motegi,1 Maki Ogawa,1 Jun Egawa,1 Takayuki Enomoto,2 Toshiyuki Someya1 1Department of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata Universit...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Hashijiri K, Watanabe Y, Fukui N, Motegi T, Ogawa M, Egawa J, Enomoto T, Someya T
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Dove Medical Press 2021
Materias:	bonding difficulties cluster analysis hads mibs-j roc analysis Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7b186490e3f14136b172de8235b576e8
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7b186490e3f14136b172de8235b576e8
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7b186490e3f14136b172de8235b576e82021-11-21T19:08:50ZIdentification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points1178-2021https://doaj.org/article/7b186490e3f14136b172de8235b576e82021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/identification-of-bonding-difficulties-in-the-peripartum-period-using--peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-NDThttps://doaj.org/toc/1178-2021Koyo Hashijiri,1 Yuichiro Watanabe,1 Naoki Fukui,1 Takaharu Motegi,1 Maki Ogawa,1 Jun Egawa,1 Takayuki Enomoto,2 Toshiyuki Someya1 1Department of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, JapanCorrespondence: Yuichiro Watanabe Email yuichiro@med.niigata-u.ac.jpPurpose: Identification of pregnant women with bonding difficulties is important to provide early intervention. However, few studies have examined the utility of self-report questionnaires that assess mother–infant bonding as screening tools for bonding difficulties. This longitudinal study aimed to identify pregnant women with bonding difficulties using the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) and to estimate its optimal cutoff points in the peripartum period.Patients and Methods: A total of 1301 pregnant women completed the MIBS-J and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at three time points: first trimester (T1; approximately 12– 15 weeks gestation), third trimester (T2; approximately 30– 34 weeks gestation), and postpartum (T3; approximately 4 weeks postpartum). A two-step cluster analysis was conducted to classify pregnant women based on their MIBS-J subscale scores at the three time points. Based on the cluster analysis results, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to estimate the optimal cutoff scores for the MIBS-J total score at each time point.Results: The two-step cluster analysis produced two clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 824) and Cluster 2 (n = 477). Both the MIBS-J and HADS scores were significantly higher in Cluster 2 than in Cluster 1 at all time points. The MIBS-J tentative cutoff points were 3/4, 3/4, and 2/3 at T1, T2, and T3, respectively.Conclusion: We identified two distinct groups across the perinatal period: pregnant women with bonding difficulties and pregnant women with normal bonding. Our findings suggest the usefulness of the MIBS-J as a screening tool to identify bonding difficulties during pregnancy.Keywords: bonding difficulties, cluster analysis, HADS, MIBS-J, ROC analysisHashijiri KWatanabe YFukui NMotegi TOgawa MEgawa JEnomoto TSomeya TDove Medical Pressarticlebonding difficultiescluster analysishadsmibs-jroc analysisNeurosciences. Biological psychiatry. NeuropsychiatryRC321-571Neurology. Diseases of the nervous systemRC346-429ENNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Vol Volume 17, Pp 3407-3413 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	bonding difficulties cluster analysis hads mibs-j roc analysis Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429
spellingShingle	bonding difficulties cluster analysis hads mibs-j roc analysis Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry RC321-571 Neurology. Diseases of the nervous system RC346-429 Hashijiri K Watanabe Y Fukui N Motegi T Ogawa M Egawa J Enomoto T Someya T Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points
description	Koyo Hashijiri,1 Yuichiro Watanabe,1 Naoki Fukui,1 Takaharu Motegi,1 Maki Ogawa,1 Jun Egawa,1 Takayuki Enomoto,2 Toshiyuki Someya1 1Department of Psychiatry, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan; 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, JapanCorrespondence: Yuichiro Watanabe Email yuichiro@med.niigata-u.ac.jpPurpose: Identification of pregnant women with bonding difficulties is important to provide early intervention. However, few studies have examined the utility of self-report questionnaires that assess mother–infant bonding as screening tools for bonding difficulties. This longitudinal study aimed to identify pregnant women with bonding difficulties using the Japanese version of the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale (MIBS-J) and to estimate its optimal cutoff points in the peripartum period.Patients and Methods: A total of 1301 pregnant women completed the MIBS-J and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at three time points: first trimester (T1; approximately 12– 15 weeks gestation), third trimester (T2; approximately 30– 34 weeks gestation), and postpartum (T3; approximately 4 weeks postpartum). A two-step cluster analysis was conducted to classify pregnant women based on their MIBS-J subscale scores at the three time points. Based on the cluster analysis results, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to estimate the optimal cutoff scores for the MIBS-J total score at each time point.Results: The two-step cluster analysis produced two clusters: Cluster 1 (n = 824) and Cluster 2 (n = 477). Both the MIBS-J and HADS scores were significantly higher in Cluster 2 than in Cluster 1 at all time points. The MIBS-J tentative cutoff points were 3/4, 3/4, and 2/3 at T1, T2, and T3, respectively.Conclusion: We identified two distinct groups across the perinatal period: pregnant women with bonding difficulties and pregnant women with normal bonding. Our findings suggest the usefulness of the MIBS-J as a screening tool to identify bonding difficulties during pregnancy.Keywords: bonding difficulties, cluster analysis, HADS, MIBS-J, ROC analysis
format	article
author	Hashijiri K Watanabe Y Fukui N Motegi T Ogawa M Egawa J Enomoto T Someya T
author_facet	Hashijiri K Watanabe Y Fukui N Motegi T Ogawa M Egawa J Enomoto T Someya T
author_sort	Hashijiri K
title	Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points
title_short	Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points
title_full	Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points
title_fullStr	Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points
title_full_unstemmed	Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points
title_sort	identification of bonding difficulties in the peripartum period using the mother-to-infant bonding scale-japanese version and its tentative cutoff points
publisher	Dove Medical Press
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7b186490e3f14136b172de8235b576e8
work_keys_str_mv	AT hashijirik identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT watanabey identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT fukuin identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT motegit identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT ogawam identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT egawaj identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT enomotot identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints AT someyat identificationofbondingdifficultiesintheperipartumperiodusingthemothertoinfantbondingscalejapaneseversionanditstentativecutoffpoints
_version_	1718418709431713792

Identification of Bonding Difficulties in the Peripartum Period Using the Mother-to-Infant Bonding Scale-Japanese Version and Its Tentative Cutoff Points

Ejemplares similares