A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
Abstract The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed2021-12-02T17:04:34ZA novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement10.1038/s41598-021-86344-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86344-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session ICC, even though a PPT measurement taken at different sessions must also imply different repetitions. The primary aim was to evaluate and report a novel metric of reliability in PPT measurement: the inter-session-repetition ICC. One rater recorded ten repetitions of PPT measurement over the lumbar region bilaterally at two sessions in twenty healthy adults using a pressure algometer. Variance components were computed using linear mixed-models and used to construct ICCs; most notably inter-session ICC and inter-session-repetition ICC. At 70.1% of the total variance, the source of greatest variability was between subjects ( $${\sigma }_{subj}^{2}$$ σ subj 2 = 222.28 N2), whereas the source of least variability (1.5% total variance) was between sessions ( $${\sigma }_{sess}^{2}$$ σ sess 2 = 4.83 N2). Derived inter-session and inter-session-repetition ICCs were 0.88 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.94) and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.53 to 0.84) respectively. Inter-session-repetition ICC provides a more conservative estimate of reliability than inter-session ICC, with the magnitude of difference being clinically meaningful. Quantifying individual sources of variability enables ICC construction to be reflective of individual testing protocols.Bernard LiewHo Yin LeeDavid RügamerAlessandro Marco De NunzioNicola R. HeneghanDeborah FallaDavid W. EvansNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Bernard Liew Ho Yin Lee David Rügamer Alessandro Marco De Nunzio Nicola R. Heneghan Deborah Falla David W. Evans A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement |
description |
Abstract The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session ICC, even though a PPT measurement taken at different sessions must also imply different repetitions. The primary aim was to evaluate and report a novel metric of reliability in PPT measurement: the inter-session-repetition ICC. One rater recorded ten repetitions of PPT measurement over the lumbar region bilaterally at two sessions in twenty healthy adults using a pressure algometer. Variance components were computed using linear mixed-models and used to construct ICCs; most notably inter-session ICC and inter-session-repetition ICC. At 70.1% of the total variance, the source of greatest variability was between subjects ( $${\sigma }_{subj}^{2}$$ σ subj 2 = 222.28 N2), whereas the source of least variability (1.5% total variance) was between sessions ( $${\sigma }_{sess}^{2}$$ σ sess 2 = 4.83 N2). Derived inter-session and inter-session-repetition ICCs were 0.88 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.94) and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.53 to 0.84) respectively. Inter-session-repetition ICC provides a more conservative estimate of reliability than inter-session ICC, with the magnitude of difference being clinically meaningful. Quantifying individual sources of variability enables ICC construction to be reflective of individual testing protocols. |
format |
article |
author |
Bernard Liew Ho Yin Lee David Rügamer Alessandro Marco De Nunzio Nicola R. Heneghan Deborah Falla David W. Evans |
author_facet |
Bernard Liew Ho Yin Lee David Rügamer Alessandro Marco De Nunzio Nicola R. Heneghan Deborah Falla David W. Evans |
author_sort |
Bernard Liew |
title |
A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement |
title_short |
A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement |
title_full |
A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement |
title_fullStr |
A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement |
title_full_unstemmed |
A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement |
title_sort |
novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bernardliew anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT hoyinlee anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT davidrugamer anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT alessandromarcodenunzio anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT nicolarheneghan anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT deborahfalla anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT davidwevans anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT bernardliew novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT hoyinlee novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT davidrugamer novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT alessandromarcodenunzio novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT nicolarheneghan novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT deborahfalla novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement AT davidwevans novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement |
_version_ |
1718381856191152128 |