A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement

Abstract The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernard Liew, Ho Yin Lee, David Rügamer, Alessandro Marco De Nunzio, Nicola R. Heneghan, Deborah Falla, David W. Evans
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed2021-12-02T17:04:34ZA novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement10.1038/s41598-021-86344-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86344-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session ICC, even though a PPT measurement taken at different sessions must also imply different repetitions. The primary aim was to evaluate and report a novel metric of reliability in PPT measurement: the inter-session-repetition ICC. One rater recorded ten repetitions of PPT measurement over the lumbar region bilaterally at two sessions in twenty healthy adults using a pressure algometer. Variance components were computed using linear mixed-models and used to construct ICCs; most notably inter-session ICC and inter-session-repetition ICC. At 70.1% of the total variance, the source of greatest variability was between subjects ( $${\sigma }_{subj}^{2}$$ σ subj 2 = 222.28 N2), whereas the source of least variability (1.5% total variance) was between sessions ( $${\sigma }_{sess}^{2}$$ σ sess 2 = 4.83 N2). Derived inter-session and inter-session-repetition ICCs were 0.88 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.94) and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.53 to 0.84) respectively. Inter-session-repetition ICC provides a more conservative estimate of reliability than inter-session ICC, with the magnitude of difference being clinically meaningful. Quantifying individual sources of variability enables ICC construction to be reflective of individual testing protocols.Bernard LiewHo Yin LeeDavid RügamerAlessandro Marco De NunzioNicola R. HeneghanDeborah FallaDavid W. EvansNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-8 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Bernard Liew
Ho Yin Lee
David Rügamer
Alessandro Marco De Nunzio
Nicola R. Heneghan
Deborah Falla
David W. Evans
A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
description Abstract The inter-session Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) is a commonly investigated and clinically important metric of reliability for pressure pain threshold (PPT) measurement. However, current investigations do not account for inter-repetition variability when calculating inter-session ICC, even though a PPT measurement taken at different sessions must also imply different repetitions. The primary aim was to evaluate and report a novel metric of reliability in PPT measurement: the inter-session-repetition ICC. One rater recorded ten repetitions of PPT measurement over the lumbar region bilaterally at two sessions in twenty healthy adults using a pressure algometer. Variance components were computed using linear mixed-models and used to construct ICCs; most notably inter-session ICC and inter-session-repetition ICC. At 70.1% of the total variance, the source of greatest variability was between subjects ( $${\sigma }_{subj}^{2}$$ σ subj 2 = 222.28 N2), whereas the source of least variability (1.5% total variance) was between sessions ( $${\sigma }_{sess}^{2}$$ σ sess 2 = 4.83 N2). Derived inter-session and inter-session-repetition ICCs were 0.88 (95%CI: 0.77 to 0.94) and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.53 to 0.84) respectively. Inter-session-repetition ICC provides a more conservative estimate of reliability than inter-session ICC, with the magnitude of difference being clinically meaningful. Quantifying individual sources of variability enables ICC construction to be reflective of individual testing protocols.
format article
author Bernard Liew
Ho Yin Lee
David Rügamer
Alessandro Marco De Nunzio
Nicola R. Heneghan
Deborah Falla
David W. Evans
author_facet Bernard Liew
Ho Yin Lee
David Rügamer
Alessandro Marco De Nunzio
Nicola R. Heneghan
Deborah Falla
David W. Evans
author_sort Bernard Liew
title A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
title_short A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
title_full A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
title_fullStr A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
title_full_unstemmed A novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
title_sort novel metric of reliability in pressure pain threshold measurement
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7b1a28fc92564bd0a683886649398aed
work_keys_str_mv AT bernardliew anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT hoyinlee anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT davidrugamer anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT alessandromarcodenunzio anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT nicolarheneghan anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT deborahfalla anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT davidwevans anovelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT bernardliew novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT hoyinlee novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT davidrugamer novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT alessandromarcodenunzio novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT nicolarheneghan novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT deborahfalla novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
AT davidwevans novelmetricofreliabilityinpressurepainthresholdmeasurement
_version_ 1718381856191152128