Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control

Abstract Low fresh gas flow rates are recommended because of their benefits, however, its use is limited due to associated risks. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether 300 mL of fresh gas flow that practised with automated gas control mode is applicable and safe. The second aim i...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Yusuf Z. Colak, Hüseyin I. Toprak
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:	Medicine R Science Q
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7b24426eb3034039a0f7ff67a56927c6
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7b24426eb3034039a0f7ff67a56927c6
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7b24426eb3034039a0f7ff67a56927c62021-12-02T18:01:47ZFeasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control10.1038/s41598-021-99648-42045-2322https://doaj.org/article/7b24426eb3034039a0f7ff67a56927c62021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-99648-4https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Low fresh gas flow rates are recommended because of their benefits, however, its use is limited due to associated risks. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether 300 mL of fresh gas flow that practised with automated gas control mode is applicable and safe. The second aim is to show that automated mode can provide economic benefits. Sixty hepatectomy cases who suitable criterias were included to cohort study in three groups as prospective, sequential, observational. An operating room were allocated only for this study. 300 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA3), 600 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA6) and, 600 mL fresh gas flow with manually (groupM6) was applied. Patients’ respiratory, hemodynamic parameters (safety), number of setting changes, O2 concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO2:0.4 during the low flow anaesthesia (feasibility) and comsumption data of anaesthetic agent and CO2 absorber (economical) were collected and compared. p < 0.05 was accepted as statistical significance level. No significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of demographic data and duration of operation. Safety datas (hemodynamic, respiratory, and tissue perfusion parameters) were within normal limits in all patients. O2 concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO2:0.4 was statistically higher in groupA3 (92%) than other groups (p < 0.001) but it was still within applicable limits (below the 100%). Number of setting changes was statistically higher in groupM6 than other groups (p < 0.001). The anaesthetic agent consumption was statistically less in groupA3 (p = 0.018). We performed fresh gas flow of 300 mL by automated mode without deviating from the safety limits and reduced the consumption of anaesthetic agent. We were able to maintain FiO2:0.4 in hepatectomies without much setting changes, and we think that the automated mode is better in terms of ease of practise.Yusuf Z. ColakHüseyin I. ToprakNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	Medicine R Science Q
spellingShingle	Medicine R Science Q Yusuf Z. Colak Hüseyin I. Toprak Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
description	Abstract Low fresh gas flow rates are recommended because of their benefits, however, its use is limited due to associated risks. The main purpose of this study was to investigate whether 300 mL of fresh gas flow that practised with automated gas control mode is applicable and safe. The second aim is to show that automated mode can provide economic benefits. Sixty hepatectomy cases who suitable criterias were included to cohort study in three groups as prospective, sequential, observational. An operating room were allocated only for this study. 300 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA3), 600 mL fresh gas flow with automated mode (groupA6) and, 600 mL fresh gas flow with manually (groupM6) was applied. Patients’ respiratory, hemodynamic parameters (safety), number of setting changes, O2 concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO2:0.4 during the low flow anaesthesia (feasibility) and comsumption data of anaesthetic agent and CO2 absorber (economical) were collected and compared. p < 0.05 was accepted as statistical significance level. No significant differences were detected between the groups in terms of demographic data and duration of operation. Safety datas (hemodynamic, respiratory, and tissue perfusion parameters) were within normal limits in all patients. O2 concentration in the flowmeter that maintained FiO2:0.4 was statistically higher in groupA3 (92%) than other groups (p < 0.001) but it was still within applicable limits (below the 100%). Number of setting changes was statistically higher in groupM6 than other groups (p < 0.001). The anaesthetic agent consumption was statistically less in groupA3 (p = 0.018). We performed fresh gas flow of 300 mL by automated mode without deviating from the safety limits and reduced the consumption of anaesthetic agent. We were able to maintain FiO2:0.4 in hepatectomies without much setting changes, and we think that the automated mode is better in terms of ease of practise.
format	article
author	Yusuf Z. Colak Hüseyin I. Toprak
author_facet	Yusuf Z. Colak Hüseyin I. Toprak
author_sort	Yusuf Z. Colak
title	Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_short	Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_full	Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_fullStr	Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_full_unstemmed	Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control
title_sort	feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by maquet flow-i equipped with automated gas control
publisher	Nature Portfolio
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7b24426eb3034039a0f7ff67a56927c6
work_keys_str_mv	AT yusufzcolak feasibilitysafetyandeconomicconsequencesofusingminimalflowanaesthesiabymaquetflowiequippedwithautomatedgascontrol AT huseyinitoprak feasibilitysafetyandeconomicconsequencesofusingminimalflowanaesthesiabymaquetflowiequippedwithautomatedgascontrol
_version_	1718378936261410816

Feasibility, safety, and economic consequences of using minimal flow anaesthesia by Maquet FLOW-i equipped with automated gas control

Ejemplares similares