Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie

Eastern Lachian Dialects vs. Western Lachian Dialects or the Dialectological Battle for the Zaolzie Region The article is devoted to the historical discussion which arose around the affiliation of the inhabitants of the Czech–Polish border area with the Czech or the Polish nationality and language....

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Irena Bogocz
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	DE EN FR PL RU
Publicado:	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing 2017
Materias:	gwara język etniczny czesko-polskie pogranicze językowe czeska część Śląska Cieszyńskiego Adolf Kellner Andrzej Sowa Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7b573e247ad74b2382cde37e0921dc21
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7b573e247ad74b2382cde37e0921dc21
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7b573e247ad74b2382cde37e0921dc212021-11-27T13:00:27ZVýchodolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie10.12797/LV.12.2017.24.151896-21222392-1226https://doaj.org/article/7b573e247ad74b2382cde37e0921dc212017-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.akademicka.pl/lv/article/view/441https://doaj.org/toc/1896-2122https://doaj.org/toc/2392-1226 Eastern Lachian Dialects vs. Western Lachian Dialects or the Dialectological Battle for the Zaolzie Region The article is devoted to the historical discussion which arose around the affiliation of the inhabitants of the Czech–Polish border area with the Czech or the Polish nationality and language. The bone of contention was the dialect used in the Czech part of the Cieszyn/Těšín region. Although the discussion was generally conducted in academic circles, it was also picked up on by the local press (i.e., the cultural monthly “Zwrot”). It concerned not only the interests of Czech (Czechoslovak) and Polish dialectology, but also posed existential questions for the Polish minority living in this part of former Czechoslovakia. The article describes the basic theses published in the 1950s–1970s. Engaged in the discussion were, among others, Adolf Kellner (who originated the debate with the publication of Východolašská nářečí I., II., ‘Eastern Lachian Dialects I., II.’ in 1946 and 1949 respectively), Jaromír Bělič, Arnošt Lamprecht, and, representing predominantly the attitudes of Polish dialectology, Karol Dejna. The polemics were marked by the Marxist ideology of the time, and the overall policy of the Czechoslovak state, which intent was to justify the affiliation of certain linguistic areas to Czechoslovakia. Irena BogoczKsiegarnia Akademicka Publishingarticlegwarajęzyk etnicznyczesko-polskie pogranicze językoweczeska część Śląska CieszyńskiegoAdolf KellnerAndrzej SowaLanguage. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammarP101-410DEENFRPLRULingVaria, Vol 12, Iss 24 (2017)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	DE EN FR PL RU
topic	gwara język etniczny czesko-polskie pogranicze językowe czeska część Śląska Cieszyńskiego Adolf Kellner Andrzej Sowa Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410
spellingShingle	gwara język etniczny czesko-polskie pogranicze językowe czeska część Śląska Cieszyńskiego Adolf Kellner Andrzej Sowa Language. Linguistic theory. Comparative grammar P101-410 Irena Bogocz Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie
description	Eastern Lachian Dialects vs. Western Lachian Dialects or the Dialectological Battle for the Zaolzie Region The article is devoted to the historical discussion which arose around the affiliation of the inhabitants of the Czech–Polish border area with the Czech or the Polish nationality and language. The bone of contention was the dialect used in the Czech part of the Cieszyn/Těšín region. Although the discussion was generally conducted in academic circles, it was also picked up on by the local press (i.e., the cultural monthly “Zwrot”). It concerned not only the interests of Czech (Czechoslovak) and Polish dialectology, but also posed existential questions for the Polish minority living in this part of former Czechoslovakia. The article describes the basic theses published in the 1950s–1970s. Engaged in the discussion were, among others, Adolf Kellner (who originated the debate with the publication of Východolašská nářečí I., II., ‘Eastern Lachian Dialects I., II.’ in 1946 and 1949 respectively), Jaromír Bělič, Arnošt Lamprecht, and, representing predominantly the attitudes of Polish dialectology, Karol Dejna. The polemics were marked by the Marxist ideology of the time, and the overall policy of the Czechoslovak state, which intent was to justify the affiliation of certain linguistic areas to Czechoslovakia.
format	article
author	Irena Bogocz
author_facet	Irena Bogocz
author_sort	Irena Bogocz
title	Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie
title_short	Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie
title_full	Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie
title_fullStr	Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie
title_full_unstemmed	Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie
title_sort	východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o zaolzie
publisher	Ksiegarnia Akademicka Publishing
publishDate	2017
url	https://doaj.org/article/7b573e247ad74b2382cde37e0921dc21
work_keys_str_mv	AT irenabogocz vychodolasskanareciversusgwarazachodniocieszynskaczylidialektologicznawojnaozaolzie
_version_	1718408873415540736

Východolašská nářečí versus gwara zachodniocieszyńska, czyli dialektologiczna wojna o Zaolzie

Ejemplares similares