The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer
Abstract To evaluate the performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We prospectively enrolled 164 patients with at least one Prostate Imagin...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Nature Portfolio
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7b63d5acaec044019801866a983a3c4a |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7b63d5acaec044019801866a983a3c4a |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7b63d5acaec044019801866a983a3c4a2021-12-02T11:37:19ZThe Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer10.1038/s41598-020-78428-62045-2322https://doaj.org/article/7b63d5acaec044019801866a983a3c4a2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78428-6https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract To evaluate the performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We prospectively enrolled 164 patients with at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) ≥ 3 lesions who underwent MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Of the PSA-derived biomarkers, the PHI had the best performance in predicting csPCa (AUC 0.792, CI 0.707–0.877) in patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions. Furthermore, the predictive power of PHI was even higher in the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions (AUC 0.884, CI 0.792–0.976). To minimize missing csPCa, we used a PHI cutoff of 27 and 7.4% of patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions could have avoided a biopsy. At this level, 2.0% of cases with csPCa would have been missed, with sensitivity and NPV rates of 98.0% and 87.5%, respectively. However, the subgroup of PI-RADS 3 was too small to define the optimal PHI cutoff. PHI was the best PSA-derived biomarker to predict csPCa in MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsies in men with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions, especially for the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who gained the most value.Yu-Hua FanPo-Hsun PanWei-Ming ChengHsin-Kai WangShu-Huei ShenHsian-Tzu LiuHao-Min ChengWei-Ren ChenTzu-Hao HuangTzu-Chun WeiI-Shen HuangChih-Chieh LinEric Y. H. HuangHsiao-Jen ChungWilliam J. S. HuangTzu-Ping LinNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-7 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Yu-Hua Fan Po-Hsun Pan Wei-Ming Cheng Hsin-Kai Wang Shu-Huei Shen Hsian-Tzu Liu Hao-Min Cheng Wei-Ren Chen Tzu-Hao Huang Tzu-Chun Wei I-Shen Huang Chih-Chieh Lin Eric Y. H. Huang Hsiao-Jen Chung William J. S. Huang Tzu-Ping Lin The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer |
description |
Abstract To evaluate the performance of the Prostate Health Index (PHI) in magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). We prospectively enrolled 164 patients with at least one Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) ≥ 3 lesions who underwent MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsy. Of the PSA-derived biomarkers, the PHI had the best performance in predicting csPCa (AUC 0.792, CI 0.707–0.877) in patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions. Furthermore, the predictive power of PHI was even higher in the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions (AUC 0.884, CI 0.792–0.976). To minimize missing csPCa, we used a PHI cutoff of 27 and 7.4% of patients with PI-RADS 4/5 lesions could have avoided a biopsy. At this level, 2.0% of cases with csPCa would have been missed, with sensitivity and NPV rates of 98.0% and 87.5%, respectively. However, the subgroup of PI-RADS 3 was too small to define the optimal PHI cutoff. PHI was the best PSA-derived biomarker to predict csPCa in MRI-TRUS fusion prostate biopsies in men with PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions, especially for the patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions who gained the most value. |
format |
article |
author |
Yu-Hua Fan Po-Hsun Pan Wei-Ming Cheng Hsin-Kai Wang Shu-Huei Shen Hsian-Tzu Liu Hao-Min Cheng Wei-Ren Chen Tzu-Hao Huang Tzu-Chun Wei I-Shen Huang Chih-Chieh Lin Eric Y. H. Huang Hsiao-Jen Chung William J. S. Huang Tzu-Ping Lin |
author_facet |
Yu-Hua Fan Po-Hsun Pan Wei-Ming Cheng Hsin-Kai Wang Shu-Huei Shen Hsian-Tzu Liu Hao-Min Cheng Wei-Ren Chen Tzu-Hao Huang Tzu-Chun Wei I-Shen Huang Chih-Chieh Lin Eric Y. H. Huang Hsiao-Jen Chung William J. S. Huang Tzu-Ping Lin |
author_sort |
Yu-Hua Fan |
title |
The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer |
title_short |
The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer |
title_full |
The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer |
title_fullStr |
The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Prostate Health Index aids multi-parametric MRI in diagnosing significant prostate cancer |
title_sort |
prostate health index aids multi-parametric mri in diagnosing significant prostate cancer |
publisher |
Nature Portfolio |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7b63d5acaec044019801866a983a3c4a |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yuhuafan theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT pohsunpan theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT weimingcheng theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT hsinkaiwang theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT shuhueishen theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT hsiantzuliu theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT haomincheng theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT weirenchen theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT tzuhaohuang theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT tzuchunwei theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT ishenhuang theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT chihchiehlin theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT ericyhhuang theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT hsiaojenchung theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT williamjshuang theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT tzupinglin theprostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT yuhuafan prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT pohsunpan prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT weimingcheng prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT hsinkaiwang prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT shuhueishen prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT hsiantzuliu prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT haomincheng prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT weirenchen prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT tzuhaohuang prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT tzuchunwei prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT ishenhuang prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT chihchiehlin prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT ericyhhuang prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT hsiaojenchung prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT williamjshuang prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer AT tzupinglin prostatehealthindexaidsmultiparametricmriindiagnosingsignificantprostatecancer |
_version_ |
1718395767956176896 |