Perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas

Access mechanisms can determine the benefits that people derive from a given ecosystem service supply. However, compared to ecosystem service availability, access has received little research attention. The relative importance of availability compared to access in limiting ecosystem service benefits...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marie Lapointe, Georgina G. Gurney, Graeme S. Cumming
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7b6b20e0986e4efeb57a93c6058d0896
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7b6b20e0986e4efeb57a93c6058d0896
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7b6b20e0986e4efeb57a93c6058d08962021-12-02T14:21:36ZPerceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas1708-308710.5751/ES-12012-250432https://doaj.org/article/7b6b20e0986e4efeb57a93c6058d08962020-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol25/iss4/art32/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Access mechanisms can determine the benefits that people derive from a given ecosystem service supply. However, compared to ecosystem service availability, access has received little research attention. The relative importance of availability compared to access in limiting ecosystem service benefits is even less well understood. In cities, the observed disconnect between people and nature might result in part from changes in ecosystem service availability and access compared to rural areas. To address these research gaps, we compared perceived limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits in urban and rural areas in the Solomon Islands. We predicted that more people would report being limited in ecosystem service benefits in urban than rural areas. Drawing on data from 200 respondents, we found that more urban dwellers reported being limited in both availability and access to the benefits that they derived from ecosystem services. Availability factors were the most frequently perceived limitations, although access played an important role for both provisioning and cultural services. In urban areas, poorer people, women, and older people identified the most limitations. Findings show the importance of investigating both ecosystem service availability and access to manage the environment in a way that sustains or increases benefits to people.Marie LapointeGeorgina G. GurneyGraeme S. CummingResilience Alliancearticlecoastal communitiesdisaggregationrural areassolomon islandsurbanizationBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 25, Iss 4, p 32 (2020)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic coastal communities
disaggregation
rural areas
solomon islands
urbanization
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle coastal communities
disaggregation
rural areas
solomon islands
urbanization
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Marie Lapointe
Georgina G. Gurney
Graeme S. Cumming
Perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas
description Access mechanisms can determine the benefits that people derive from a given ecosystem service supply. However, compared to ecosystem service availability, access has received little research attention. The relative importance of availability compared to access in limiting ecosystem service benefits is even less well understood. In cities, the observed disconnect between people and nature might result in part from changes in ecosystem service availability and access compared to rural areas. To address these research gaps, we compared perceived limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits in urban and rural areas in the Solomon Islands. We predicted that more people would report being limited in ecosystem service benefits in urban than rural areas. Drawing on data from 200 respondents, we found that more urban dwellers reported being limited in both availability and access to the benefits that they derived from ecosystem services. Availability factors were the most frequently perceived limitations, although access played an important role for both provisioning and cultural services. In urban areas, poorer people, women, and older people identified the most limitations. Findings show the importance of investigating both ecosystem service availability and access to manage the environment in a way that sustains or increases benefits to people.
format article
author Marie Lapointe
Georgina G. Gurney
Graeme S. Cumming
author_facet Marie Lapointe
Georgina G. Gurney
Graeme S. Cumming
author_sort Marie Lapointe
title Perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas
title_short Perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas
title_full Perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas
title_fullStr Perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas
title_full_unstemmed Perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas
title_sort perceived availability and access limitations to ecosystem service well-being benefits increase in urban areas
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2020
url https://doaj.org/article/7b6b20e0986e4efeb57a93c6058d0896
work_keys_str_mv AT marielapointe perceivedavailabilityandaccesslimitationstoecosystemservicewellbeingbenefitsincreaseinurbanareas
AT georginaggurney perceivedavailabilityandaccesslimitationstoecosystemservicewellbeingbenefitsincreaseinurbanareas
AT graemescumming perceivedavailabilityandaccesslimitationstoecosystemservicewellbeingbenefitsincreaseinurbanareas
_version_ 1718391495973666816