Combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation

Agricultural production provides food, feed, and renewable energy, generates economic profits, and contributes to social welfare in many ways. However, intensive farming is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity. Although current market forces and regulations such as the European Union's Co...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Andrea Kaim, Bartosz Bartkowski, Nele Lienhoop, Christoph Schröter-Schlaack, Martin Volk, Michael Strauch
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Resilience Alliance 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7b956f0535b0495783b14c9aa1c8accc
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7b956f0535b0495783b14c9aa1c8accc
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7b956f0535b0495783b14c9aa1c8accc2021-12-02T14:14:42ZCombining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation1708-308710.5751/ES-12116-260109https://doaj.org/article/7b956f0535b0495783b14c9aa1c8accc2021-03-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol26/iss1/art9/https://doaj.org/toc/1708-3087Agricultural production provides food, feed, and renewable energy, generates economic profits, and contributes to social welfare in many ways. However, intensive farming is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity. Although current market forces and regulations such as the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, seem to foster agricultural intensification, a socially and ecologically optimal land-use strategy should seek to reconcile agricultural production with biodiversity conservation. Research on spatial land-use allocation lacks studies that consider both aspects simultaneously. Therefore, we developed a method that finds land-use strategies with a maximum contribution to social welfare, taking into account the landscape's biophysical potential. We applied a multiobjective optimization algorithm that identified landscape configurations that maximize agricultural production and biodiversity based on their contribution to social welfare. Social welfare was approximated by the profit contribution of agricultural production and society's willingness to pay for biodiversity. The algorithm simultaneously evaluated the biophysical outcomes of different land uses using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and a biodiversity model. The method was applied to an agricultural landscape in central Germany. The results show that, in this area, overall social welfare can be increased compared to the status quo if both social benefits from biodiversity and economic profits from agricultural production are considered in land-use allocation. Further, the resulting optimal solutions can create win-win situations between the two, usually conflicting, objectives. The integration of preference information into the biophysical optimization allows reducing the usually large set of Pareto-optimal solutions and thus facilitates further stakeholder-based analyses. Our explorative study provides an example of how socioeconomic data and biophysical models can be combined to support decision making and the development of land-use policies.Andrea KaimBartosz BartkowskiNele LienhoopChristoph Schröter-SchlaackMartin VolkMichael StrauchResilience Alliancearticleagricultural productionbiodiversitymultiobjective optimizationpareto frontierpreferencessocial welfaretrade-offswillingness to payBiology (General)QH301-705.5EcologyQH540-549.5ENEcology and Society, Vol 26, Iss 1, p 9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic agricultural production
biodiversity
multiobjective optimization
pareto frontier
preferences
social welfare
trade-offs
willingness to pay
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
spellingShingle agricultural production
biodiversity
multiobjective optimization
pareto frontier
preferences
social welfare
trade-offs
willingness to pay
Biology (General)
QH301-705.5
Ecology
QH540-549.5
Andrea Kaim
Bartosz Bartkowski
Nele Lienhoop
Christoph Schröter-Schlaack
Martin Volk
Michael Strauch
Combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation
description Agricultural production provides food, feed, and renewable energy, generates economic profits, and contributes to social welfare in many ways. However, intensive farming is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity. Although current market forces and regulations such as the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy, seem to foster agricultural intensification, a socially and ecologically optimal land-use strategy should seek to reconcile agricultural production with biodiversity conservation. Research on spatial land-use allocation lacks studies that consider both aspects simultaneously. Therefore, we developed a method that finds land-use strategies with a maximum contribution to social welfare, taking into account the landscape's biophysical potential. We applied a multiobjective optimization algorithm that identified landscape configurations that maximize agricultural production and biodiversity based on their contribution to social welfare. Social welfare was approximated by the profit contribution of agricultural production and society's willingness to pay for biodiversity. The algorithm simultaneously evaluated the biophysical outcomes of different land uses using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and a biodiversity model. The method was applied to an agricultural landscape in central Germany. The results show that, in this area, overall social welfare can be increased compared to the status quo if both social benefits from biodiversity and economic profits from agricultural production are considered in land-use allocation. Further, the resulting optimal solutions can create win-win situations between the two, usually conflicting, objectives. The integration of preference information into the biophysical optimization allows reducing the usually large set of Pareto-optimal solutions and thus facilitates further stakeholder-based analyses. Our explorative study provides an example of how socioeconomic data and biophysical models can be combined to support decision making and the development of land-use policies.
format article
author Andrea Kaim
Bartosz Bartkowski
Nele Lienhoop
Christoph Schröter-Schlaack
Martin Volk
Michael Strauch
author_facet Andrea Kaim
Bartosz Bartkowski
Nele Lienhoop
Christoph Schröter-Schlaack
Martin Volk
Michael Strauch
author_sort Andrea Kaim
title Combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation
title_short Combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation
title_full Combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation
title_fullStr Combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation
title_full_unstemmed Combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation
title_sort combining biophysical optimization with economic preference analysis for agricultural land-use allocation
publisher Resilience Alliance
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7b956f0535b0495783b14c9aa1c8accc
work_keys_str_mv AT andreakaim combiningbiophysicaloptimizationwitheconomicpreferenceanalysisforagriculturallanduseallocation
AT bartoszbartkowski combiningbiophysicaloptimizationwitheconomicpreferenceanalysisforagriculturallanduseallocation
AT nelelienhoop combiningbiophysicaloptimizationwitheconomicpreferenceanalysisforagriculturallanduseallocation
AT christophschroterschlaack combiningbiophysicaloptimizationwitheconomicpreferenceanalysisforagriculturallanduseallocation
AT martinvolk combiningbiophysicaloptimizationwitheconomicpreferenceanalysisforagriculturallanduseallocation
AT michaelstrauch combiningbiophysicaloptimizationwitheconomicpreferenceanalysisforagriculturallanduseallocation
_version_ 1718391736082890752