Inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising.
Existing techniques to reconstruct tree models of progression for accumulative processes, such as cancer, seek to estimate causation by combining correlation and a frequentist notion of temporal priority. In this paper, we define a novel theoretical framework called CAPRESE (CAncer PRogression Extra...
Guardado en:
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7b96cb7021714f50b638ff3db535e60c |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7b96cb7021714f50b638ff3db535e60c |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7b96cb7021714f50b638ff3db535e60c2021-11-25T05:57:14ZInferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0108358https://doaj.org/article/7b96cb7021714f50b638ff3db535e60c2014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108358https://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Existing techniques to reconstruct tree models of progression for accumulative processes, such as cancer, seek to estimate causation by combining correlation and a frequentist notion of temporal priority. In this paper, we define a novel theoretical framework called CAPRESE (CAncer PRogression Extraction with Single Edges) to reconstruct such models based on the notion of probabilistic causation defined by Suppes. We consider a general reconstruction setting complicated by the presence of noise in the data due to biological variation, as well as experimental or measurement errors. To improve tolerance to noise we define and use a shrinkage-like estimator. We prove the correctness of our algorithm by showing asymptotic convergence to the correct tree under mild constraints on the level of noise. Moreover, on synthetic data, we show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art, that it is efficient even with a relatively small number of samples and that its performance quickly converges to its asymptote as the number of samples increases. For real cancer datasets obtained with different technologies, we highlight biologically significant differences in the progressions inferred with respect to other competing techniques and we also show how to validate conjectured biological relations with progression models.Loes Olde LoohuisGiulio CaravagnaAlex GraudenziDaniele RamazzottiGiancarlo MauriMarco AntoniottiBud MishraPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 10, p e108358 (2014) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
Medicine R Science Q |
spellingShingle |
Medicine R Science Q Loes Olde Loohuis Giulio Caravagna Alex Graudenzi Daniele Ramazzotti Giancarlo Mauri Marco Antoniotti Bud Mishra Inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising. |
description |
Existing techniques to reconstruct tree models of progression for accumulative processes, such as cancer, seek to estimate causation by combining correlation and a frequentist notion of temporal priority. In this paper, we define a novel theoretical framework called CAPRESE (CAncer PRogression Extraction with Single Edges) to reconstruct such models based on the notion of probabilistic causation defined by Suppes. We consider a general reconstruction setting complicated by the presence of noise in the data due to biological variation, as well as experimental or measurement errors. To improve tolerance to noise we define and use a shrinkage-like estimator. We prove the correctness of our algorithm by showing asymptotic convergence to the correct tree under mild constraints on the level of noise. Moreover, on synthetic data, we show that our approach outperforms the state-of-the-art, that it is efficient even with a relatively small number of samples and that its performance quickly converges to its asymptote as the number of samples increases. For real cancer datasets obtained with different technologies, we highlight biologically significant differences in the progressions inferred with respect to other competing techniques and we also show how to validate conjectured biological relations with progression models. |
format |
article |
author |
Loes Olde Loohuis Giulio Caravagna Alex Graudenzi Daniele Ramazzotti Giancarlo Mauri Marco Antoniotti Bud Mishra |
author_facet |
Loes Olde Loohuis Giulio Caravagna Alex Graudenzi Daniele Ramazzotti Giancarlo Mauri Marco Antoniotti Bud Mishra |
author_sort |
Loes Olde Loohuis |
title |
Inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising. |
title_short |
Inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising. |
title_full |
Inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising. |
title_fullStr |
Inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising. |
title_sort |
inferring tree causal models of cancer progression with probability raising. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7b96cb7021714f50b638ff3db535e60c |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT loesoldeloohuis inferringtreecausalmodelsofcancerprogressionwithprobabilityraising AT giuliocaravagna inferringtreecausalmodelsofcancerprogressionwithprobabilityraising AT alexgraudenzi inferringtreecausalmodelsofcancerprogressionwithprobabilityraising AT danieleramazzotti inferringtreecausalmodelsofcancerprogressionwithprobabilityraising AT giancarlomauri inferringtreecausalmodelsofcancerprogressionwithprobabilityraising AT marcoantoniotti inferringtreecausalmodelsofcancerprogressionwithprobabilityraising AT budmishra inferringtreecausalmodelsofcancerprogressionwithprobabilityraising |
_version_ |
1718414349601603584 |