A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study

Abstract Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kouji Izumi, Takashi Shima, Kazuyoshi Shigehara, Kiyoshi Sawada, Renato Naito, Yuki Kato, Mitsuo Ofude, Hiroshi Kano, Hiroaki Iwamoto, Hiroshi Yaegashi, Kazufumi Nakashima, Masashi Iijima, Shohei Kawaguchi, Takahiro Nohara, Yoshifumi Kadono, Atsushi Mizokami
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7bb7d3474c4248bf97d9aa6bd57814ce
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7bb7d3474c4248bf97d9aa6bd57814ce
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7bb7d3474c4248bf97d9aa6bd57814ce2021-12-02T13:19:30ZA novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study10.1038/s41598-021-84054-72045-2322https://doaj.org/article/7bb7d3474c4248bf97d9aa6bd57814ce2021-02-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84054-7https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment.Kouji IzumiTakashi ShimaKazuyoshi ShigeharaKiyoshi SawadaRenato NaitoYuki KatoMitsuo OfudeHiroshi KanoHiroaki IwamotoHiroshi YaegashiKazufumi NakashimaMasashi IijimaShohei KawaguchiTakahiro NoharaYoshifumi KadonoAtsushi MizokamiNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-9 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Kouji Izumi
Takashi Shima
Kazuyoshi Shigehara
Kiyoshi Sawada
Renato Naito
Yuki Kato
Mitsuo Ofude
Hiroshi Kano
Hiroaki Iwamoto
Hiroshi Yaegashi
Kazufumi Nakashima
Masashi Iijima
Shohei Kawaguchi
Takahiro Nohara
Yoshifumi Kadono
Atsushi Mizokami
A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
description Abstract Emergence of malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) has been reported as a sign of poor prognosis; however, the distribution of survival time in patients with MUO is considerably wide, and no risk classification score has been constructed. To evaluate whether a novel risk classification score for overall survival that we previously developed, is effective in a large cohort. Investigator-initiated, prospective, multicenter diagnostic/prognostic study was conducted. Patients with MUO were divided into three risk groups based on the score calculated using four prognostic factors (PLaCT: Primary site, Laterality, serum Creatinine level, and Treatment for primary site) at the first visit, and prospective follow-up was performed. Overall survival and ureteral stent failure-free survival of each risk group were compared. In total, 300 patients with 21 different primary sites were enrolled. The numbers of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 105, 106, and 89, respectively. Median survival times of patients in good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 406, 221, and 77 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). In 217 patients with ureteral stenting, median ureteral stent failure-free survival times of good, intermediate, and poor risk groups were 385, 183, and 57 days, respectively (P < 0.0001). Limitations include the limited ethnicity and the extended duration of study enrollment. The novel PLaCT risk classification score could divide MUO patients into three risk groups with distinct survival times and ureteral stent patencies. This score will aid in establishing prognosis and treatment strategy for all physicians engaged in cancer treatment.
format article
author Kouji Izumi
Takashi Shima
Kazuyoshi Shigehara
Kiyoshi Sawada
Renato Naito
Yuki Kato
Mitsuo Ofude
Hiroshi Kano
Hiroaki Iwamoto
Hiroshi Yaegashi
Kazufumi Nakashima
Masashi Iijima
Shohei Kawaguchi
Takahiro Nohara
Yoshifumi Kadono
Atsushi Mizokami
author_facet Kouji Izumi
Takashi Shima
Kazuyoshi Shigehara
Kiyoshi Sawada
Renato Naito
Yuki Kato
Mitsuo Ofude
Hiroshi Kano
Hiroaki Iwamoto
Hiroshi Yaegashi
Kazufumi Nakashima
Masashi Iijima
Shohei Kawaguchi
Takahiro Nohara
Yoshifumi Kadono
Atsushi Mizokami
author_sort Kouji Izumi
title A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_short A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_full A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_fullStr A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_full_unstemmed A novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
title_sort novel risk classification score for malignant ureteral obstruction: a multicenter prospective validation study
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7bb7d3474c4248bf97d9aa6bd57814ce
work_keys_str_mv AT koujiizumi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT takashishima anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kazuyoshishigehara anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kiyoshisawada anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT renatonaito anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT yukikato anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT mitsuoofude anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT hiroshikano anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT hiroakiiwamoto anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT hiroshiyaegashi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kazufuminakashima anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT masashiiijima anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT shoheikawaguchi anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT takahironohara anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT yoshifumikadono anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT atsushimizokami anovelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT koujiizumi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT takashishima novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kazuyoshishigehara novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kiyoshisawada novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT renatonaito novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT yukikato novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT mitsuoofude novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT hiroshikano novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT hiroakiiwamoto novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT hiroshiyaegashi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT kazufuminakashima novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT masashiiijima novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT shoheikawaguchi novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT takahironohara novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT yoshifumikadono novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
AT atsushimizokami novelriskclassificationscoreformalignantureteralobstructionamulticenterprospectivevalidationstudy
_version_ 1718393282304671744