Use of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling

This study employs a novel combined pilot plant consisting of an anaerobic reactor followed by a membrane electrochemical bioreactor (eMBR) to treat domestic water containing selected contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) [ibuprofen (IB), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF) and 17α-ethinylestrad...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karen Mora-Cabrera, Carlos Peña-Guzmán, Arturo Trapote, Daniel Prats
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: IWA Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7c09729c7abe4a0481357c4d77d1b34c
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7c09729c7abe4a0481357c4d77d1b34c
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7c09729c7abe4a0481357c4d77d1b34c2021-11-05T17:19:27ZUse of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling2709-80282709-803610.2166/aqua.2021.058https://doaj.org/article/7c09729c7abe4a0481357c4d77d1b34c2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttp://aqua.iwaponline.com/content/70/7/984https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8028https://doaj.org/toc/2709-8036This study employs a novel combined pilot plant consisting of an anaerobic reactor followed by a membrane electrochemical bioreactor (eMBR) to treat domestic water containing selected contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) [ibuprofen (IB), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2)]. The first phase operated as a conventional membrane bioreactor to achieve the removal of organic matter [chemical oxygen demand (COD)], the CECs and phosphorus. A removal rate of 96.3% for COD, 94.5% for IB, 37.1% for CBZ, 87.1% for DCF and 96% for EE2 was obtained. In the three subsequent phases, current density (CD) of 5, 10 and 15 A/m2 was applied successively in the eMBR with the aim of investigating the effects on the removal of the former components and the fouling of the membrane. After the application of 5 and 10 A/m2 CD, the removal rate of COD decreased. Regarding phosphorus, a CD of 5 A/m2 was enough to achieve the rate of 97% and the membrane fouling suffered a substantial reduction too. Finally, the experimental results were subject to statistical analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon tests to validate the influence of each CD. HIGHLIGHTS Novel combination of UASB + eMBR technologies proves effective in wastewater treatment.; UASB stands in COD removal, MBR in CECs removal and eMBR in TP removal.; A current density of 5 A/m2 is the most efficient in reducing membrane fouling.; A current density of 5 A/m2 improves the removal of some CECs.;Karen Mora-CabreraCarlos Peña-GuzmánArturo TrapoteDaniel PratsIWA Publishingarticlecombined treatmentcurrent density effectmembrane foulingphosphorus removaluasb + embrEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066Environmental sciencesGE1-350ENAqua, Vol 70, Iss 7, Pp 984-1001 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic combined treatment
current density effect
membrane fouling
phosphorus removal
uasb + embr
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
spellingShingle combined treatment
current density effect
membrane fouling
phosphorus removal
uasb + embr
Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering
TD1-1066
Environmental sciences
GE1-350
Karen Mora-Cabrera
Carlos Peña-Guzmán
Arturo Trapote
Daniel Prats
Use of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling
description This study employs a novel combined pilot plant consisting of an anaerobic reactor followed by a membrane electrochemical bioreactor (eMBR) to treat domestic water containing selected contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) [ibuprofen (IB), carbamazepine (CBZ), diclofenac (DCF) and 17α-ethinylestradiol (EE2)]. The first phase operated as a conventional membrane bioreactor to achieve the removal of organic matter [chemical oxygen demand (COD)], the CECs and phosphorus. A removal rate of 96.3% for COD, 94.5% for IB, 37.1% for CBZ, 87.1% for DCF and 96% for EE2 was obtained. In the three subsequent phases, current density (CD) of 5, 10 and 15 A/m2 was applied successively in the eMBR with the aim of investigating the effects on the removal of the former components and the fouling of the membrane. After the application of 5 and 10 A/m2 CD, the removal rate of COD decreased. Regarding phosphorus, a CD of 5 A/m2 was enough to achieve the rate of 97% and the membrane fouling suffered a substantial reduction too. Finally, the experimental results were subject to statistical analysis using the Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon tests to validate the influence of each CD. HIGHLIGHTS Novel combination of UASB + eMBR technologies proves effective in wastewater treatment.; UASB stands in COD removal, MBR in CECs removal and eMBR in TP removal.; A current density of 5 A/m2 is the most efficient in reducing membrane fouling.; A current density of 5 A/m2 improves the removal of some CECs.;
format article
author Karen Mora-Cabrera
Carlos Peña-Guzmán
Arturo Trapote
Daniel Prats
author_facet Karen Mora-Cabrera
Carlos Peña-Guzmán
Arturo Trapote
Daniel Prats
author_sort Karen Mora-Cabrera
title Use of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling
title_short Use of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling
title_full Use of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling
title_fullStr Use of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling
title_full_unstemmed Use of combined UASB + eMBR treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling
title_sort use of combined uasb + embr treatment for removal of emerging micropollutants and reduction of fouling
publisher IWA Publishing
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7c09729c7abe4a0481357c4d77d1b34c
work_keys_str_mv AT karenmoracabrera useofcombineduasbembrtreatmentforremovalofemergingmicropollutantsandreductionoffouling
AT carlospenaguzman useofcombineduasbembrtreatmentforremovalofemergingmicropollutantsandreductionoffouling
AT arturotrapote useofcombineduasbembrtreatmentforremovalofemergingmicropollutantsandreductionoffouling
AT danielprats useofcombineduasbembrtreatmentforremovalofemergingmicropollutantsandreductionoffouling
_version_ 1718444107618058240