Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer

The author studies the works of Austrian writers Elias Canetti “Earwitness. 50 characters” (“Der Ohrenzeuge. 50 Charaktere”) and Klaus Hoffer “In Graz” (“Bei den Bieresch”). The relevance of the study is determined by the need to comprehend the literary process of Austria in the second half of the t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	E. M. Shastina, J. K. Kazakova
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2020
Materias:	elias canetti klaus hoffer literary anthroponym occasional onomastics poetics genre narrative strategies Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7c590e32fb2b459c9e2a645abe749a3a
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7c590e32fb2b459c9e2a645abe749a3a
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7c590e32fb2b459c9e2a645abe749a3a2021-12-02T07:58:09ZFunctioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2020-1-257-269https://doaj.org/article/7c590e32fb2b459c9e2a645abe749a3a2020-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/139https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The author studies the works of Austrian writers Elias Canetti “Earwitness. 50 characters” (“Der Ohrenzeuge. 50 Charaktere”) and Klaus Hoffer “In Graz” (“Bei den Bieresch”). The relevance of the study is determined by the need to comprehend the literary process of Austria in the second half of the twentieth century. A review of the existing points of view regarding the significance of the analyzed works of both authors and in modern Austrian literature is performed. The debatable nature of Canetti's book genre and the originality of the poetics of the Hoffer novel are noted. The authors of the article proceed from the fact that Canetti's work is a “collection” of literary miniatures; Hoffer's novel can be considered as an example of the initial stage of development of German-language postmodern literature. The narrative strategies used by Canetti and Hoffer to create a surrealistic context and “fantastic reality” are drawn into consideration. The authors dwell on the study of the functioning of literary anthroponyms in the text space of works. It is proved that fictional onomastics is involved in the creation of semantic multidimensionality of a literary text. Hoffer’s novel traces Canetti’s borrowed method of creating a verbal image with enriched contextual semantics using proper names. The translation aspect remains outside the scope of the article.E. M. ShastinaJ. K. KazakovaTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleelias canettiklaus hofferliterary anthroponymoccasional onomasticspoeticsgenrenarrative strategiesSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 1, Pp 257-269 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	elias canetti klaus hoffer literary anthroponym occasional onomastics poetics genre narrative strategies Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	elias canetti klaus hoffer literary anthroponym occasional onomastics poetics genre narrative strategies Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 E. M. Shastina J. K. Kazakova Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer
description	The author studies the works of Austrian writers Elias Canetti “Earwitness. 50 characters” (“Der Ohrenzeuge. 50 Charaktere”) and Klaus Hoffer “In Graz” (“Bei den Bieresch”). The relevance of the study is determined by the need to comprehend the literary process of Austria in the second half of the twentieth century. A review of the existing points of view regarding the significance of the analyzed works of both authors and in modern Austrian literature is performed. The debatable nature of Canetti's book genre and the originality of the poetics of the Hoffer novel are noted. The authors of the article proceed from the fact that Canetti's work is a “collection” of literary miniatures; Hoffer's novel can be considered as an example of the initial stage of development of German-language postmodern literature. The narrative strategies used by Canetti and Hoffer to create a surrealistic context and “fantastic reality” are drawn into consideration. The authors dwell on the study of the functioning of literary anthroponyms in the text space of works. It is proved that fictional onomastics is involved in the creation of semantic multidimensionality of a literary text. Hoffer’s novel traces Canetti’s borrowed method of creating a verbal image with enriched contextual semantics using proper names. The translation aspect remains outside the scope of the article.
format	article
author	E. M. Shastina J. K. Kazakova
author_facet	E. M. Shastina J. K. Kazakova
author_sort	E. M. Shastina
title	Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer
title_short	Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer
title_full	Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer
title_fullStr	Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer
title_full_unstemmed	Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer
title_sort	functioning of literary anthroponyms in the works by e. canetti and k. hoffer
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/7c590e32fb2b459c9e2a645abe749a3a
work_keys_str_mv	AT emshastina functioningofliteraryanthroponymsintheworksbyecanettiandkhoffer AT jkkazakova functioningofliteraryanthroponymsintheworksbyecanettiandkhoffer
_version_	1718398858545856512

Functioning of Literary Anthroponyms in the Works by E. Canetti and K. Hoffer

Ejemplares similares