Comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support

AIM: To compare the curative effect of retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens(IOL)implantation and posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL in the aphakic eyes without capsular support.METHODS: The present retrospective study included 70 aphakic eyes without capsular support. According...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhuo-Ran Liu, Teguedy Mohamed Bouye, Kun Liang, Li-Ming Tao
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7cc6cc6e15e84e67924b27791f01d3cb
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7cc6cc6e15e84e67924b27791f01d3cb
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7cc6cc6e15e84e67924b27791f01d3cb2021-11-22T14:22:33ZComparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support1672-512310.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2021.12.21https://doaj.org/article/7cc6cc6e15e84e67924b27791f01d3cb2021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2021/12/202112021.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/1672-5123AIM: To compare the curative effect of retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens(IOL)implantation and posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL in the aphakic eyes without capsular support.METHODS: The present retrospective study included 70 aphakic eyes without capsular support. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups, including group A(35 eyes)with treatment of retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation, group B(35 eyes)with treatment of posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL. The uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP)and corneal endothelial cell density(CECD)of the two groups were documented and compared before operation and 3d, 1, 3, 6mo and 1a after operation. Furthermore, the stability of IOL in both groups, as well as the intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.RESULTS: The patients in the present study were followed up for 12 to 14mo. 3d after surgery, UCVA in group A was significantly improved compared with that before surgery(P<0.01), while BCVA had no difference compared with that before surgery(P=0.073).UCVA in group B showed no difference(P=0.097), while BCVA was worse(P=0.002). UCVA and BCVA in both groups were significantly elevated 1mo after surgery(P<0.05), and remained stable 6, 3mo later,respectively. Furthermore, IOP in both groups remained in normal level during the follow up period, 0.7% and 2.3% reduction of CECD in A group and B gruop was observed at 1a after operation respectively(P<0.05). Both IOP and CECD between the two groups have no significant differenc at each time point during the follow up period(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between whole eye astigmatism and corneal astigmatism in A group and B gruop at 1 and 6mo after operation(P>0.05). Additionally, There was 1 case of IOL dislocation in each group after operation, which was further recovered by operation. Significant tilt and deviation of IOL were not observed in the rest of the patients during the follow up period. The other postoperative complications were mild with no difference in complications between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION: For aphakic eyes without capsular support, both retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation and posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL are safe and effective surgical methods. Retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation has relatively simple operation, lower damage to the eyeball tissue, the shorter operation time, and the quicker recovery of postoperative visual acuity, which is one of the effective clinical treatments.Zhuo-Ran LiuTeguedy Mohamed BouyeKun LiangLi-Ming TaoPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)articleiris-claw intraocular lensretropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantationtransscleral suture fixationOphthalmologyRE1-994ENGuoji Yanke Zazhi, Vol 21, Iss 12, Pp 2130-2136 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic iris-claw intraocular lens
retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation
transscleral suture fixation
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle iris-claw intraocular lens
retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens implantation
transscleral suture fixation
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Zhuo-Ran Liu
Teguedy Mohamed Bouye
Kun Liang
Li-Ming Tao
Comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support
description AIM: To compare the curative effect of retropupillary iris claw intraocular lens(IOL)implantation and posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL in the aphakic eyes without capsular support.METHODS: The present retrospective study included 70 aphakic eyes without capsular support. According to the different surgical methods, the patients were divided into two groups, including group A(35 eyes)with treatment of retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation, group B(35 eyes)with treatment of posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL. The uncorrected visual acuity(UCVA), best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), intraocular pressure(IOP)and corneal endothelial cell density(CECD)of the two groups were documented and compared before operation and 3d, 1, 3, 6mo and 1a after operation. Furthermore, the stability of IOL in both groups, as well as the intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.RESULTS: The patients in the present study were followed up for 12 to 14mo. 3d after surgery, UCVA in group A was significantly improved compared with that before surgery(P<0.01), while BCVA had no difference compared with that before surgery(P=0.073).UCVA in group B showed no difference(P=0.097), while BCVA was worse(P=0.002). UCVA and BCVA in both groups were significantly elevated 1mo after surgery(P<0.05), and remained stable 6, 3mo later,respectively. Furthermore, IOP in both groups remained in normal level during the follow up period, 0.7% and 2.3% reduction of CECD in A group and B gruop was observed at 1a after operation respectively(P<0.05). Both IOP and CECD between the two groups have no significant differenc at each time point during the follow up period(P>0.05).There was no significant difference between whole eye astigmatism and corneal astigmatism in A group and B gruop at 1 and 6mo after operation(P>0.05). Additionally, There was 1 case of IOL dislocation in each group after operation, which was further recovered by operation. Significant tilt and deviation of IOL were not observed in the rest of the patients during the follow up period. The other postoperative complications were mild with no difference in complications between the two groups(P>0.05).CONCLUSION: For aphakic eyes without capsular support, both retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation and posterior chamber ciliary scleral suture fixed IOL are safe and effective surgical methods. Retropupillary iris claw IOL implantation has relatively simple operation, lower damage to the eyeball tissue, the shorter operation time, and the quicker recovery of postoperative visual acuity, which is one of the effective clinical treatments.
format article
author Zhuo-Ran Liu
Teguedy Mohamed Bouye
Kun Liang
Li-Ming Tao
author_facet Zhuo-Ran Liu
Teguedy Mohamed Bouye
Kun Liang
Li-Ming Tao
author_sort Zhuo-Ran Liu
title Comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support
title_short Comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support
title_full Comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support
title_fullStr Comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support
title_sort comparison of outcomes of two intraocular lens implantation procedures for aphakic eyes without capsular support
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7cc6cc6e15e84e67924b27791f01d3cb
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuoranliu comparisonofoutcomesoftwointraocularlensimplantationproceduresforaphakiceyeswithoutcapsularsupport
AT teguedymohamedbouye comparisonofoutcomesoftwointraocularlensimplantationproceduresforaphakiceyeswithoutcapsularsupport
AT kunliang comparisonofoutcomesoftwointraocularlensimplantationproceduresforaphakiceyeswithoutcapsularsupport
AT limingtao comparisonofoutcomesoftwointraocularlensimplantationproceduresforaphakiceyeswithoutcapsularsupport
_version_ 1718417560340267008