Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane

Abstract The total sugarcane (Saccharum L.) production has increased worldwide; however, the rate of growth is lower compared with other major crops, mainly due to a plateauing of genetic gain. Genomic selection (GS) has proven to substantially increase the rate of genetic gain in many crops. To inv...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Md S. Islam, Per H. McCord, Marcus O. Olatoye, Lifang Qin, Sushma Sood, Alexander Edward Lipka, James R. Todd
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Wiley 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7d0d41588562430ba7895bb7695953a4
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7d0d41588562430ba7895bb7695953a4
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7d0d41588562430ba7895bb7695953a42021-12-05T07:50:11ZExperimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane1940-337210.1002/tpg2.20148https://doaj.org/article/7d0d41588562430ba7895bb7695953a42021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1002/tpg2.20148https://doaj.org/toc/1940-3372Abstract The total sugarcane (Saccharum L.) production has increased worldwide; however, the rate of growth is lower compared with other major crops, mainly due to a plateauing of genetic gain. Genomic selection (GS) has proven to substantially increase the rate of genetic gain in many crops. To investigate the utility of GS in future sugarcane breeding, a field trial was conducted using 432 sugarcane clones using an augmented design with two replications. Two major diseases in sugarcane, brown and orange rust (BR and OR), were screened artificially using whorl inoculation method in the field over two crop cycles. The genotypic data were generated through target enrichment sequencing technologies. After filtering, a set of 8,825 single nucleotide polymorphic markers were used to assess the prediction accuracy of multiple GS models. Using fivefold cross‐validation, we observed GS prediction accuracies for BR and OR that ranged from 0.28 to 0.43 and 0.13 to 0.29, respectively, across two crop cycles and combined cycles. The prediction ability further improved by including a known major gene for resistance to BR as a fixed effect in the GS model. It also substantially reduced the minimum number of markers and training population size required for GS. The nonparametric GS models outperformed the parametric GS suggesting that nonadditive genetic effects could contribute genomic sources underlying BR and OR. This study demonstrated that GS could potentially predict the genomic estimated breeding value for selecting the desired germplasm for sugarcane breeding for disease resistance.Md S. IslamPer H. McCordMarcus O. OlatoyeLifang QinSushma SoodAlexander Edward LipkaJames R. ToddWileyarticlePlant cultureSB1-1110GeneticsQH426-470ENThe Plant Genome, Vol 14, Iss 3, Pp n/a-n/a (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Plant culture
SB1-1110
Genetics
QH426-470
spellingShingle Plant culture
SB1-1110
Genetics
QH426-470
Md S. Islam
Per H. McCord
Marcus O. Olatoye
Lifang Qin
Sushma Sood
Alexander Edward Lipka
James R. Todd
Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane
description Abstract The total sugarcane (Saccharum L.) production has increased worldwide; however, the rate of growth is lower compared with other major crops, mainly due to a plateauing of genetic gain. Genomic selection (GS) has proven to substantially increase the rate of genetic gain in many crops. To investigate the utility of GS in future sugarcane breeding, a field trial was conducted using 432 sugarcane clones using an augmented design with two replications. Two major diseases in sugarcane, brown and orange rust (BR and OR), were screened artificially using whorl inoculation method in the field over two crop cycles. The genotypic data were generated through target enrichment sequencing technologies. After filtering, a set of 8,825 single nucleotide polymorphic markers were used to assess the prediction accuracy of multiple GS models. Using fivefold cross‐validation, we observed GS prediction accuracies for BR and OR that ranged from 0.28 to 0.43 and 0.13 to 0.29, respectively, across two crop cycles and combined cycles. The prediction ability further improved by including a known major gene for resistance to BR as a fixed effect in the GS model. It also substantially reduced the minimum number of markers and training population size required for GS. The nonparametric GS models outperformed the parametric GS suggesting that nonadditive genetic effects could contribute genomic sources underlying BR and OR. This study demonstrated that GS could potentially predict the genomic estimated breeding value for selecting the desired germplasm for sugarcane breeding for disease resistance.
format article
author Md S. Islam
Per H. McCord
Marcus O. Olatoye
Lifang Qin
Sushma Sood
Alexander Edward Lipka
James R. Todd
author_facet Md S. Islam
Per H. McCord
Marcus O. Olatoye
Lifang Qin
Sushma Sood
Alexander Edward Lipka
James R. Todd
author_sort Md S. Islam
title Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane
title_short Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane
title_full Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane
title_fullStr Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane
title_full_unstemmed Experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane
title_sort experimental evaluation of genomic selection prediction for rust resistance in sugarcane
publisher Wiley
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7d0d41588562430ba7895bb7695953a4
work_keys_str_mv AT mdsislam experimentalevaluationofgenomicselectionpredictionforrustresistanceinsugarcane
AT perhmccord experimentalevaluationofgenomicselectionpredictionforrustresistanceinsugarcane
AT marcusoolatoye experimentalevaluationofgenomicselectionpredictionforrustresistanceinsugarcane
AT lifangqin experimentalevaluationofgenomicselectionpredictionforrustresistanceinsugarcane
AT sushmasood experimentalevaluationofgenomicselectionpredictionforrustresistanceinsugarcane
AT alexanderedwardlipka experimentalevaluationofgenomicselectionpredictionforrustresistanceinsugarcane
AT jamesrtodd experimentalevaluationofgenomicselectionpredictionforrustresistanceinsugarcane
_version_ 1718372564584103936