Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes

João Coelho1, Luísa Malheiro1, João Melo Beirão1,2, Angelina Meireles1,2, Bernardete Pessoa1,2 1Unit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal; 2Unit of Ophthalmology, Universidade Do Porto-Instituto Ci&ecir...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coelho J, Malheiro L, Melo Beirão J, Meireles A, Pessoa B
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7d332ae5de2a45b99615deb965cb1585
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7d332ae5de2a45b99615deb965cb1585
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7d332ae5de2a45b99615deb965cb15852021-12-02T07:55:18ZReal-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes1177-5483https://doaj.org/article/7d332ae5de2a45b99615deb965cb15852019-09-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.dovepress.com/real-world-retrospective-comparison-of-019-mg-fluocinolone-acetonide-a-peer-reviewed-article-OPTHhttps://doaj.org/toc/1177-5483João Coelho1, Luísa Malheiro1, João Melo Beirão1,2, Angelina Meireles1,2, Bernardete Pessoa1,2 1Unit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal; 2Unit of Ophthalmology, Universidade Do Porto-Instituto Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, PortugalCorrespondence: João CoelhoUnit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto 4099-001, PortugalTel +351 91 765 6826Email joaomsmc@gmail.comPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term real-world effectiveness of FAc and DEX implants in vitrectomized DME eyes in a real-world setting.Methods: This was a non-interventional, retrospective, comparative study of 46 vitrectomized eyes in 33 patients with persistent or recurrent DME quantified best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) over up to 37 months.Results: Both FAc and DEX treatment led to statistically and clinically significant improvements in BCVA and CFT. FAc >10-letter improvement on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] chart over months 3–24 and a sustained ∼200 μm CFT reduction over months 1–24; DEX: >5-letter improvement on the ETDRS chart at months 1 and 3 and >100 μm CFT reduction at month 1. FAc demonstrated sustained, stable and predictable effects on BCVA and CFT over 24 months and also improved BCVA and decreased CFT in a cohort of DME eyes that was refractory to DEX over 6 months.Conclusion: This real-world study demonstrates long-term effectiveness of FAc in vitrectomized DME eyes and sustained effectiveness in DME eyes that did not respond to DEX therapy.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, fluocinolone acetonide, dexamethasone implant, intravitreal implants, real-world, vitrectomyCoelho JMalheiro LMelo Beirão JMeireles APessoa BDove Medical Pressarticlediabetic macular edemafluocinolone acetonidedexamethasone implantintravitreal implantsreal-worldvitrectomyOphthalmologyRE1-994ENClinical Ophthalmology, Vol Volume 13, Pp 1751-1759 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic diabetic macular edema
fluocinolone acetonide
dexamethasone implant
intravitreal implants
real-world
vitrectomy
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
spellingShingle diabetic macular edema
fluocinolone acetonide
dexamethasone implant
intravitreal implants
real-world
vitrectomy
Ophthalmology
RE1-994
Coelho J
Malheiro L
Melo Beirão J
Meireles A
Pessoa B
Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes
description João Coelho1, Luísa Malheiro1, João Melo Beirão1,2, Angelina Meireles1,2, Bernardete Pessoa1,2 1Unit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário Do Porto, Porto, Portugal; 2Unit of Ophthalmology, Universidade Do Porto-Instituto Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Porto, PortugalCorrespondence: João CoelhoUnit of Ophthalmology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Largo Prof. Abel Salazar, Porto 4099-001, PortugalTel +351 91 765 6826Email joaomsmc@gmail.comPurpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term real-world effectiveness of FAc and DEX implants in vitrectomized DME eyes in a real-world setting.Methods: This was a non-interventional, retrospective, comparative study of 46 vitrectomized eyes in 33 patients with persistent or recurrent DME quantified best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT) and intraocular pressure (IOP) over up to 37 months.Results: Both FAc and DEX treatment led to statistically and clinically significant improvements in BCVA and CFT. FAc >10-letter improvement on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] chart over months 3–24 and a sustained ∼200 μm CFT reduction over months 1–24; DEX: >5-letter improvement on the ETDRS chart at months 1 and 3 and >100 μm CFT reduction at month 1. FAc demonstrated sustained, stable and predictable effects on BCVA and CFT over 24 months and also improved BCVA and decreased CFT in a cohort of DME eyes that was refractory to DEX over 6 months.Conclusion: This real-world study demonstrates long-term effectiveness of FAc in vitrectomized DME eyes and sustained effectiveness in DME eyes that did not respond to DEX therapy.Keywords: diabetic macular edema, fluocinolone acetonide, dexamethasone implant, intravitreal implants, real-world, vitrectomy
format article
author Coelho J
Malheiro L
Melo Beirão J
Meireles A
Pessoa B
author_facet Coelho J
Malheiro L
Melo Beirão J
Meireles A
Pessoa B
author_sort Coelho J
title Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes
title_short Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes
title_full Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes
title_fullStr Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes
title_full_unstemmed Real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes
title_sort real-world retrospective comparison of 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide and 0.7 mg dexamethasone intravitreal implants for the treatment of diabetic macular edema in vitrectomized eyes
publisher Dove Medical Press
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/7d332ae5de2a45b99615deb965cb1585
work_keys_str_mv AT coelhoj realworldretrospectivecomparisonof019mgfluocinoloneacetonideand07mgdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantsforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemainvitrectomizedeyes
AT malheirol realworldretrospectivecomparisonof019mgfluocinoloneacetonideand07mgdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantsforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemainvitrectomizedeyes
AT melobeiraoj realworldretrospectivecomparisonof019mgfluocinoloneacetonideand07mgdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantsforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemainvitrectomizedeyes
AT meirelesa realworldretrospectivecomparisonof019mgfluocinoloneacetonideand07mgdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantsforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemainvitrectomizedeyes
AT pessoab realworldretrospectivecomparisonof019mgfluocinoloneacetonideand07mgdexamethasoneintravitrealimplantsforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemainvitrectomizedeyes
_version_ 1718399109504696320