Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks
The thrust block is one of the most widely recognized methods of resisting thrust forces. This type of infrastructure should be installed in bends, dead ends, tees and wyes. Thrust blocks perform the function of transferring thrust force to the ground safely. Thrust block dimensions are designed bas...
Guardado en:
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | article |
Lenguaje: | EN |
Publicado: |
IWA Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://doaj.org/article/7d4068d7701e4685a79e3eed98bff868 |
Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
id |
oai:doaj.org-article:7d4068d7701e4685a79e3eed98bff868 |
---|---|
record_format |
dspace |
spelling |
oai:doaj.org-article:7d4068d7701e4685a79e3eed98bff8682021-11-06T11:20:33ZComparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks0273-12231996-973210.2166/wst.2021.307https://doaj.org/article/7d4068d7701e4685a79e3eed98bff8682021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://wst.iwaponline.com/content/84/5/1302https://doaj.org/toc/0273-1223https://doaj.org/toc/1996-9732The thrust block is one of the most widely recognized methods of resisting thrust forces. This type of infrastructure should be installed in bends, dead ends, tees and wyes. Thrust blocks perform the function of transferring thrust force to the ground safely. Thrust block dimensions are designed based on hydrostatic pressures, bend angles, and soil properties in the surrounding area. Several codes exist for designing thrust blocks, but we focus on Egyptian code for design and implementation of pipelines for drinking water and sewage networks (ECDIPWSN) and the American Water Works Association (AWWA). In this methodology, the steps of thrust block design by the codes are demonstrated and applied individually to one of the published papers. The goal of the study was to find the optimum percentages between the dimensions of the block in the two codes and to compare the quantity of concrete after the block was designed by each code. Based on the research, it was found that the concrete amount of the block designed by AWWA was smaller than that designed by ECDIPWSN. HIGHLIGHT Results of the study discovered the volume of the thrust block created by the AWWA method was smaller than the volume created by the ECDIPWSN method when excavation depth was low but was larger when excavation depth was large.;Osama S. HussienIWA Publishingarticleawwaecdipwsnthrust blockthrust forceEnvironmental technology. Sanitary engineeringTD1-1066ENWater Science and Technology, Vol 84, Iss 5, Pp 1302-1308 (2021) |
institution |
DOAJ |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
EN |
topic |
awwa ecdipwsn thrust block thrust force Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 |
spellingShingle |
awwa ecdipwsn thrust block thrust force Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering TD1-1066 Osama S. Hussien Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks |
description |
The thrust block is one of the most widely recognized methods of resisting thrust forces. This type of infrastructure should be installed in bends, dead ends, tees and wyes. Thrust blocks perform the function of transferring thrust force to the ground safely. Thrust block dimensions are designed based on hydrostatic pressures, bend angles, and soil properties in the surrounding area. Several codes exist for designing thrust blocks, but we focus on Egyptian code for design and implementation of pipelines for drinking water and sewage networks (ECDIPWSN) and the American Water Works Association (AWWA). In this methodology, the steps of thrust block design by the codes are demonstrated and applied individually to one of the published papers. The goal of the study was to find the optimum percentages between the dimensions of the block in the two codes and to compare the quantity of concrete after the block was designed by each code. Based on the research, it was found that the concrete amount of the block designed by AWWA was smaller than that designed by ECDIPWSN. HIGHLIGHT
Results of the study discovered the volume of the thrust block created by the AWWA method was smaller than the volume created by the ECDIPWSN method when excavation depth was low but was larger when excavation depth was large.; |
format |
article |
author |
Osama S. Hussien |
author_facet |
Osama S. Hussien |
author_sort |
Osama S. Hussien |
title |
Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks |
title_short |
Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks |
title_full |
Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks |
title_fullStr |
Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks |
title_sort |
comparative study for designing the horizontal thrust blocks in pipelines for water and sewage networks |
publisher |
IWA Publishing |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
https://doaj.org/article/7d4068d7701e4685a79e3eed98bff868 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT osamashussien comparativestudyfordesigningthehorizontalthrustblocksinpipelinesforwaterandsewagenetworks |
_version_ |
1718443741784571904 |