The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde

The article is dedicated to the publications of Ljubomir Micić and Branko Ve Poljanski in Maska, the Ljubljana performing arts journal from 1920. While with his engagement in Maska Micić primarily wanted to present himself as a writer outside Zagreb (first, he published in Maska a review of the play...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Pranjić Kristina
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN SR
Publicado:	Akademija umetnosti Univerziteta u Novom Sadu 2021
Materias:	maska yugoslav avant-garde branko ve poljanski ljubomir micić Arts in general NX1-820
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7dac300dc03c4d368c604bf6bb999491
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7dac300dc03c4d368c604bf6bb999491
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7dac300dc03c4d368c604bf6bb9994912021-12-05T21:40:03ZThe significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde2334-86662560-310810.5937/ZbAkU2109111Phttps://doaj.org/article/7dac300dc03c4d368c604bf6bb9994912021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/2334-8666/2021/2334-86662109111P.pdfhttps://doaj.org/toc/2334-8666https://doaj.org/toc/2560-3108The article is dedicated to the publications of Ljubomir Micić and Branko Ve Poljanski in Maska, the Ljubljana performing arts journal from 1920. While with his engagement in Maska Micić primarily wanted to present himself as a writer outside Zagreb (first, he published in Maska a review of the play Anfisa, and then his own play Istočni Greh was reviewed), Poljanski used his engagement in Maska for a polemic with Ljubljana critics, to later continue his critical response to Ljubljana's artistic milieu in his journal Svetokret, as well as in Zenit. Moreover, one of Poljanski's main motives for publishing an independent journal in Ljubljana was the continuation of the polemic he had started in Maska. Therefore, this article presents the assumption that for a complete genealogy of the beginnings of cooperation between Slovenian avantgarde and representatives of Yugoslav zenithism, it is necessary to take into account Maska, although it was not considered a revolutionary or avant-garde journal. Yet, its aspiration to become international and its openness to different languages and polemics contributed to the exchange of opinions about art and criticism of the time, which was a fruitful ground for the development of relations between various representatives of the Yugoslav avant-garde and their independent actions.Pranjić KristinaAkademija umetnosti Univerziteta u Novom Saduarticlemaskayugoslav avant-gardebranko ve poljanskiljubomir micićArts in generalNX1-820ENSRZbornik Radova Akademije Umetnosti, Vol 2021, Iss 9, Pp 111-121 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN SR
topic	maska yugoslav avant-garde branko ve poljanski ljubomir micić Arts in general NX1-820
spellingShingle	maska yugoslav avant-garde branko ve poljanski ljubomir micić Arts in general NX1-820 Pranjić Kristina The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde
description	The article is dedicated to the publications of Ljubomir Micić and Branko Ve Poljanski in Maska, the Ljubljana performing arts journal from 1920. While with his engagement in Maska Micić primarily wanted to present himself as a writer outside Zagreb (first, he published in Maska a review of the play Anfisa, and then his own play Istočni Greh was reviewed), Poljanski used his engagement in Maska for a polemic with Ljubljana critics, to later continue his critical response to Ljubljana's artistic milieu in his journal Svetokret, as well as in Zenit. Moreover, one of Poljanski's main motives for publishing an independent journal in Ljubljana was the continuation of the polemic he had started in Maska. Therefore, this article presents the assumption that for a complete genealogy of the beginnings of cooperation between Slovenian avantgarde and representatives of Yugoslav zenithism, it is necessary to take into account Maska, although it was not considered a revolutionary or avant-garde journal. Yet, its aspiration to become international and its openness to different languages and polemics contributed to the exchange of opinions about art and criticism of the time, which was a fruitful ground for the development of relations between various representatives of the Yugoslav avant-garde and their independent actions.
format	article
author	Pranjić Kristina
author_facet	Pranjić Kristina
author_sort	Pranjić Kristina
title	The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde
title_short	The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde
title_full	The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde
title_fullStr	The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde
title_full_unstemmed	The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde
title_sort	significance of the ljubljana maska journal (1920/21) in the context of the yugoslav avant-garde
publisher	Akademija umetnosti Univerziteta u Novom Sadu
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7dac300dc03c4d368c604bf6bb999491
work_keys_str_mv	AT pranjickristina thesignificanceoftheljubljanamaskajournal192021inthecontextoftheyugoslavavantgarde AT pranjickristina significanceoftheljubljanamaskajournal192021inthecontextoftheyugoslavavantgarde
_version_	1718370952018919424

The significance of the Ljubljana Maska Journal (1920/21) in the context of the Yugoslav avant-garde

Ejemplares similares