Laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?

Muscle strength is important for firefighters work capacity. Laboratory tests used for measurements of muscle strength, however, are complicated, expensive and time consuming. The aims of the present study were to investigate correlations between physical capacity within commonly occurring and physi...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ann-Sofie Lindberg, Juha Oksa, Christer Malm
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7dc624ec6adc47c18949f0c730822093
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7dc624ec6adc47c18949f0c730822093
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7dc624ec6adc47c18949f0c7308220932021-11-18T08:28:55ZLaboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0091215https://doaj.org/article/7dc624ec6adc47c18949f0c7308220932014-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24614596/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203Muscle strength is important for firefighters work capacity. Laboratory tests used for measurements of muscle strength, however, are complicated, expensive and time consuming. The aims of the present study were to investigate correlations between physical capacity within commonly occurring and physically demanding firefighting work tasks and both laboratory and field tests in full time (N = 8) and part-time (N = 10) male firefighters and civilian men (N = 8) and women (N = 12), and also to give recommendations as to which field tests might be useful for evaluating firefighters' physical work capacity. Laboratory tests of isokinetic maximal (IM) and endurance (IE) muscle power and dynamic balance, field tests including maximal and endurance muscle performance, and simulated firefighting work tasks were performed. Correlations with work capacity were analyzed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs). The highest significant (p<0.01) correlations with laboratory and field tests were for Cutting: IE trunk extension (rs = 0.72) and maximal hand grip strength (rs = 0.67), for Stairs: IE shoulder flexion (rs = -0.81) and barbell shoulder press (rs = -0.77), for Pulling: IE shoulder extension (rs = -0.82) and bench press (rs = -0.85), for Demolition: IE knee extension (rs = 0.75) and bench press (rs = 0.83), for Rescue: IE shoulder flexion (rs = -0.83) and bench press (rs = -0.82), and for the Terrain work task: IE trunk flexion (rs = -0.58) and upright barbell row (rs = -0.70). In conclusion, field tests may be used instead of laboratory tests. Maximal hand grip strength, bench press, chin ups, dips, upright barbell row, standing broad jump, and barbell shoulder press were strongly correlated (rs≥0.7) with work capacity and are therefore recommended for evaluating firefighters work capacity.Ann-Sofie LindbergJuha OksaChrister MalmPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 9, Iss 3, p e91215 (2014)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Ann-Sofie Lindberg
Juha Oksa
Christer Malm
Laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?
description Muscle strength is important for firefighters work capacity. Laboratory tests used for measurements of muscle strength, however, are complicated, expensive and time consuming. The aims of the present study were to investigate correlations between physical capacity within commonly occurring and physically demanding firefighting work tasks and both laboratory and field tests in full time (N = 8) and part-time (N = 10) male firefighters and civilian men (N = 8) and women (N = 12), and also to give recommendations as to which field tests might be useful for evaluating firefighters' physical work capacity. Laboratory tests of isokinetic maximal (IM) and endurance (IE) muscle power and dynamic balance, field tests including maximal and endurance muscle performance, and simulated firefighting work tasks were performed. Correlations with work capacity were analyzed with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs). The highest significant (p<0.01) correlations with laboratory and field tests were for Cutting: IE trunk extension (rs = 0.72) and maximal hand grip strength (rs = 0.67), for Stairs: IE shoulder flexion (rs = -0.81) and barbell shoulder press (rs = -0.77), for Pulling: IE shoulder extension (rs = -0.82) and bench press (rs = -0.85), for Demolition: IE knee extension (rs = 0.75) and bench press (rs = 0.83), for Rescue: IE shoulder flexion (rs = -0.83) and bench press (rs = -0.82), and for the Terrain work task: IE trunk flexion (rs = -0.58) and upright barbell row (rs = -0.70). In conclusion, field tests may be used instead of laboratory tests. Maximal hand grip strength, bench press, chin ups, dips, upright barbell row, standing broad jump, and barbell shoulder press were strongly correlated (rs≥0.7) with work capacity and are therefore recommended for evaluating firefighters work capacity.
format article
author Ann-Sofie Lindberg
Juha Oksa
Christer Malm
author_facet Ann-Sofie Lindberg
Juha Oksa
Christer Malm
author_sort Ann-Sofie Lindberg
title Laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?
title_short Laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?
title_full Laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?
title_fullStr Laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?
title_sort laboratory or field tests for evaluating firefighters' work capacity?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2014
url https://doaj.org/article/7dc624ec6adc47c18949f0c730822093
work_keys_str_mv AT annsofielindberg laboratoryorfieldtestsforevaluatingfirefightersworkcapacity
AT juhaoksa laboratoryorfieldtestsforevaluatingfirefightersworkcapacity
AT christermalm laboratoryorfieldtestsforevaluatingfirefightersworkcapacity
_version_ 1718421750562160640