Dominance-as-markedness

Dominance-as-markedness

This paper examines a formal consequence of the assumption that dominance is equivalent to markedness (Casali 2016): if dominant ATR values are marked and therefore specified, while recessive values are unmarked and unspecified, then no phonological process in a language with ATR dominance should r...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Katherine Hout
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
FR
Publicado: LibraryPress@UF 2019
Materias:
ATR;
markedness;
dominant-recessive harmony;
assimilation;
Eastern Nilotic;
Bari;
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7dee6b20a19a4d1dac4250b190fabea2
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7dee6b20a19a4d1dac4250b190fabea2
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7dee6b20a19a4d1dac4250b190fabea22021-11-19T03:51:56ZDominance-as-markedness10.32473/sal.v48i2.1180390039-35332154-428Xhttps://doaj.org/article/7dee6b20a19a4d1dac4250b190fabea22019-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://journals.flvc.org/sal/article/view/118039https://doaj.org/toc/0039-3533https://doaj.org/toc/2154-428X This paper examines a formal consequence of the assumption that dominance is equivalent to markedness (Casali 2016): if dominant ATR values are marked and therefore specified, while recessive values are unmarked and unspecified, then no phonological process in a language with ATR dominance should require reference to the recessive value. This claim is examined in light of new data and analyses of ATR harmony and three other vowel assimilation patterns in Bari (Eastern Nilotic; BFA). I demonstrate that all four of these processes are analyzable without reference to the recessive value of ATR, supporting the characterization of dominance as markedness, and markedness as specification Katherine HoutLibraryPress@UFarticleATR;markedness;dominant-recessive harmony;assimilation;Eastern Nilotic;Bari;Philology. LinguisticsP1-1091ENFRStudies in African Linguistics, Vol 48, Iss 2 (2019)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
FR
topic ATR;
markedness;
dominant-recessive harmony;
assimilation;
Eastern Nilotic;
Bari;
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
spellingShingle ATR;
markedness;
dominant-recessive harmony;
assimilation;
Eastern Nilotic;
Bari;
Philology. Linguistics
P1-1091
Katherine Hout
Dominance-as-markedness
description This paper examines a formal consequence of the assumption that dominance is equivalent to markedness (Casali 2016): if dominant ATR values are marked and therefore specified, while recessive values are unmarked and unspecified, then no phonological process in a language with ATR dominance should require reference to the recessive value. This claim is examined in light of new data and analyses of ATR harmony and three other vowel assimilation patterns in Bari (Eastern Nilotic; BFA). I demonstrate that all four of these processes are analyzable without reference to the recessive value of ATR, supporting the characterization of dominance as markedness, and markedness as specification
format article
author Katherine Hout
author_facet Katherine Hout
author_sort Katherine Hout
title Dominance-as-markedness
title_short Dominance-as-markedness
title_full Dominance-as-markedness
title_fullStr Dominance-as-markedness
title_full_unstemmed Dominance-as-markedness
title_sort dominance-as-markedness
publisher LibraryPress@UF
publishDate 2019
url https://doaj.org/article/7dee6b20a19a4d1dac4250b190fabea2
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinehout dominanceasmarkedness
_version_ 1718420618941038592

Ejemplares similares