An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering

During drilling, to maximize future expected production of hydrocarbon resources, the experts commonly adjust the trajectory (geosteer) in response to new insights obtained through real-time measurements. Geosteering workflows are increasingly based on the quantification of subsurface uncertainties...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sergey Alyaev, Sofija Ivanova, Andrew Holsaeter, Reidar Brumer Bratvold, Morten Bendiksen
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
G
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7e195f0452f441f0b7d2f698d46c25c9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7e195f0452f441f0b7d2f698d46c25c9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7e195f0452f441f0b7d2f698d46c25c92021-11-12T04:47:12ZAn interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering2590-197410.1016/j.acags.2021.100072https://doaj.org/article/7e195f0452f441f0b7d2f698d46c25c92021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590197421000203https://doaj.org/toc/2590-1974During drilling, to maximize future expected production of hydrocarbon resources, the experts commonly adjust the trajectory (geosteer) in response to new insights obtained through real-time measurements. Geosteering workflows are increasingly based on the quantification of subsurface uncertainties during real-time operations. As a consequence, operational decision-making is becoming both better informed and more complex. This paper presents an experimental web-based decision support system, which can be used to both teach expert decisions under uncertainty or further develop decision optimization algorithms in a controlled environment. A user of the system (either human or AI) controls the decisions to steer the well or stop drilling. Whenever a user drills ahead, the system produces simulated measurements along the selected well trajectory which are used to update the uncertainty represented by model realizations using the ensemble Kalman filter. To enable informed decisions the system is equipped with functionality to evaluate the value of the selected trajectory under uncertainty with respect to the objectives of the current experiment.To illustrate the utility of the system as a benchmark, we present the initial experiment, in which we compare the decision skills of geoscientists with those of a recently published automatic decision support algorithm. The experiment and the survey after it showed that most participants were able to use the interface and complete the three test rounds. At the same time, the automated algorithm outperformed 28 out of 29 human participants.Such an experiment is not sufficient to draw conclusions about practical geosteering but is nevertheless useful for geoscience. First, this communication-by-doing made 76% of respondents more curious about and/or confident in the presented technologies. Second, the system can be further used as a benchmark for sequential decisions under uncertainty. This can accelerate development of algorithms and improve the training for decision making.Sergey AlyaevSofija IvanovaAndrew HolsaeterReidar Brumer BratvoldMorten BendiksenElsevierarticleInteractive benchmarkSequential geosteering decisionsUncertainty quantificationExpert decisionsExperimental studyDecision support systemGeography. Anthropology. RecreationGGeologyQE1-996.5Electronic computers. Computer scienceQA75.5-76.95ENApplied Computing and Geosciences, Vol 12, Iss , Pp 100072- (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Interactive benchmark
Sequential geosteering decisions
Uncertainty quantification
Expert decisions
Experimental study
Decision support system
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Geology
QE1-996.5
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
spellingShingle Interactive benchmark
Sequential geosteering decisions
Uncertainty quantification
Expert decisions
Experimental study
Decision support system
Geography. Anthropology. Recreation
G
Geology
QE1-996.5
Electronic computers. Computer science
QA75.5-76.95
Sergey Alyaev
Sofija Ivanova
Andrew Holsaeter
Reidar Brumer Bratvold
Morten Bendiksen
An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
description During drilling, to maximize future expected production of hydrocarbon resources, the experts commonly adjust the trajectory (geosteer) in response to new insights obtained through real-time measurements. Geosteering workflows are increasingly based on the quantification of subsurface uncertainties during real-time operations. As a consequence, operational decision-making is becoming both better informed and more complex. This paper presents an experimental web-based decision support system, which can be used to both teach expert decisions under uncertainty or further develop decision optimization algorithms in a controlled environment. A user of the system (either human or AI) controls the decisions to steer the well or stop drilling. Whenever a user drills ahead, the system produces simulated measurements along the selected well trajectory which are used to update the uncertainty represented by model realizations using the ensemble Kalman filter. To enable informed decisions the system is equipped with functionality to evaluate the value of the selected trajectory under uncertainty with respect to the objectives of the current experiment.To illustrate the utility of the system as a benchmark, we present the initial experiment, in which we compare the decision skills of geoscientists with those of a recently published automatic decision support algorithm. The experiment and the survey after it showed that most participants were able to use the interface and complete the three test rounds. At the same time, the automated algorithm outperformed 28 out of 29 human participants.Such an experiment is not sufficient to draw conclusions about practical geosteering but is nevertheless useful for geoscience. First, this communication-by-doing made 76% of respondents more curious about and/or confident in the presented technologies. Second, the system can be further used as a benchmark for sequential decisions under uncertainty. This can accelerate development of algorithms and improve the training for decision making.
format article
author Sergey Alyaev
Sofija Ivanova
Andrew Holsaeter
Reidar Brumer Bratvold
Morten Bendiksen
author_facet Sergey Alyaev
Sofija Ivanova
Andrew Holsaeter
Reidar Brumer Bratvold
Morten Bendiksen
author_sort Sergey Alyaev
title An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
title_short An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
title_full An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
title_fullStr An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
title_full_unstemmed An interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
title_sort interactive sequential-decision benchmark from geosteering
publisher Elsevier
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7e195f0452f441f0b7d2f698d46c25c9
work_keys_str_mv AT sergeyalyaev aninteractivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT sofijaivanova aninteractivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT andrewholsaeter aninteractivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT reidarbrumerbratvold aninteractivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT mortenbendiksen aninteractivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT sergeyalyaev interactivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT sofijaivanova interactivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT andrewholsaeter interactivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT reidarbrumerbratvold interactivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
AT mortenbendiksen interactivesequentialdecisionbenchmarkfromgeosteering
_version_ 1718431238856900608