El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa

Objective/context: In the camping trip model, Gerald Cohen proposes two principles which would be desirable for socialism: a principle of radical equality of opportunities and community principle. Against this model, the liberal objection condemns its goal monism; the objection about motivations hol...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Fernando Lizárraga
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ES PT
Publicado:	Universidad de los Andes 2021
Materias:	equality of opportunities community socialism liberalism International relations JZ2-6530 Political science (General) JA1-92
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7e30acc1cb7c4373866be5256d5fd7f2
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7e30acc1cb7c4373866be5256d5fd7f2
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7e30acc1cb7c4373866be5256d5fd7f22021-11-09T20:06:54ZEl modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.040121-56121900-6004https://doaj.org/article/7e30acc1cb7c4373866be5256d5fd7f22021-10-01T00:00:00Zhttps://revistas.uniandes.edu.co/doi/full/10.7440/colombiaint108.2021.04https://doaj.org/toc/0121-5612https://doaj.org/toc/1900-6004Objective/context: In the camping trip model, Gerald Cohen proposes two principles which would be desirable for socialism: a principle of radical equality of opportunities and community principle. Against this model, the liberal objection condemns its goal monism; the objection about motivations holds that self-interest prevails over practices based on selfless reciprocity; and the anarcho-capitalist objection denounces a fallacious comparison and the idealization of human nature. This article seeks to rebut all three objections, by arguing a) that there is no such goal monism since the principles are not goals and, moreover, they allow much room for self-realization; b) that a self-interested expectation of reciprocity is not a sine qua non precondition to enter the camping-trip and that noninstrumental reciprocity is a device of assurance within the community principle; and c) that the Cohenite model does not presuppose morally perfect persons –since it anticipates regrettable and risky choices–, nor does it commit the fallacy of comparing ideal socialism with real capitalism. Methodology: The argumentation is developed according to the analytic method, in keeping with the standards employed in post-Rawlsian contemporary political theory. Conclusions: The camping-trip model does not fall into goal-monism, nor into a wrong characterization of motivations, nor into the utopianism of conceiving morally perfect subjects. Originality. This defense of the Cohenite model against the three objections reinforces its robustness and permits to understand it as an attempt of reconciling luck egalitarianism with fraternal or relational egalitarianism.Fernando LizárragaUniversidad de los Andesarticleequality of opportunitiescommunitysocialismliberalismInternational relationsJZ2-6530Political science (General)JA1-92ENESPTColombia Internacional, Vol 108, Pp 63-86 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ES PT
topic	equality of opportunities community socialism liberalism International relations JZ2-6530 Political science (General) JA1-92
spellingShingle	equality of opportunities community socialism liberalism International relations JZ2-6530 Political science (General) JA1-92 Fernando Lizárraga El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa
description	Objective/context: In the camping trip model, Gerald Cohen proposes two principles which would be desirable for socialism: a principle of radical equality of opportunities and community principle. Against this model, the liberal objection condemns its goal monism; the objection about motivations holds that self-interest prevails over practices based on selfless reciprocity; and the anarcho-capitalist objection denounces a fallacious comparison and the idealization of human nature. This article seeks to rebut all three objections, by arguing a) that there is no such goal monism since the principles are not goals and, moreover, they allow much room for self-realization; b) that a self-interested expectation of reciprocity is not a sine qua non precondition to enter the camping-trip and that noninstrumental reciprocity is a device of assurance within the community principle; and c) that the Cohenite model does not presuppose morally perfect persons –since it anticipates regrettable and risky choices–, nor does it commit the fallacy of comparing ideal socialism with real capitalism. Methodology: The argumentation is developed according to the analytic method, in keeping with the standards employed in post-Rawlsian contemporary political theory. Conclusions: The camping-trip model does not fall into goal-monism, nor into a wrong characterization of motivations, nor into the utopianism of conceiving morally perfect subjects. Originality. This defense of the Cohenite model against the three objections reinforces its robustness and permits to understand it as an attempt of reconciling luck egalitarianism with fraternal or relational egalitarianism.
format	article
author	Fernando Lizárraga
author_facet	Fernando Lizárraga
author_sort	Fernando Lizárraga
title	El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa
title_short	El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa
title_full	El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa
title_fullStr	El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa
title_full_unstemmed	El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa
title_sort	el modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa
publisher	Universidad de los Andes
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7e30acc1cb7c4373866be5256d5fd7f2
work_keys_str_mv	AT fernandolizarraga elmodelodecampamentosocialistaunadefensa
_version_	1718440760887476224

El modelo de campamento socialista: una defensa

Ejemplares similares