Medullary vein architecture modulates the white matter BOLD cerebrovascular reactivity signal response to CO2: Observations from high-resolution T2* weighted imaging at 7T

Brain stress testing using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI to evaluate changes in cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is of growing interest for evaluating white matter integrity. However, even under healthy conditions, the white matter BOLD-CVR response differs notably from that observed...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Alex A. Bhogal
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
CVR
MRI
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7e31865aa98846a4a2b8ae8507cfbcdd
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Brain stress testing using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) MRI to evaluate changes in cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) is of growing interest for evaluating white matter integrity. However, even under healthy conditions, the white matter BOLD-CVR response differs notably from that observed in the gray matter. In addition to actual arterial vascular control, the venous draining topology may influence the WM-CVR response leading to signal delays and dispersions. These types of alterations in hemodynamic parameters are sometimes linked with pathology, but may also arise from differences in normal venous architecture. In this work, high-resolution T2*weighted anatomical images combined with BOLD imaging during a hypercapnic breathing protocol were acquired using a 7 tesla MRI system. Hemodynamic parameters including base CVR, hemodynamic lag, lag-corrected CVR, response onset and signal dispersion, and finally ΔCVR (corrected CVR minus base CVR) were calculated in 8 subjects. Parameter maps were spatially normalized and correlated against an MNI-registered white matter medullary vein atlas. Moderate correlations (Pearson's rho) were observed between medullary vessel frequency (MVF) and ΔCVR (0.52; 0.58 for total WM), MVF and hemodynamic lag (0.42; 0.54 for total WM), MVF and signal dispersion (0.44; 0.53 for total WM), and finally MVF and signal onset (0.43; 0.52 for total WM). Results indicate that, when assessed in the context of the WM venous architecture, changes in the response shape may only be partially reflective of the actual vascular reactivity response occurring further upstream by control vessels. This finding may have implications when attributing diseases mechanisms and/or progression to presumed impaired WM BOLD-CVR.