“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”

The results of a comparative analysis of the novel “The Enchanted Wanderer” by N. S. Leskov and the novel “Hero of Our Time” by M. Yu. Lermontov are presented. Particular attention is paid to the image ofthe prince, parodic in relation to Pechorin and “superfluous people”, as well as the storyline o...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	V. G. Mekhtiev
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	RU
Publicado:	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov 2021
Materias:	leskov lermontov comparative analysis typological connection pechorinism righteous plot Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7e3dc00734b5495fa64efb831a7032f5
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7e3dc00734b5495fa64efb831a7032f5
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7e3dc00734b5495fa64efb831a7032f52021-12-02T07:58:14Z“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”2225-756X2227-129510.24224/2227-1295-2021-5-225-236https://doaj.org/article/7e3dc00734b5495fa64efb831a7032f52021-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.nauka-dialog.ru/jour/article/view/2733https://doaj.org/toc/2225-756Xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2227-1295The results of a comparative analysis of the novel “The Enchanted Wanderer” by N. S. Leskov and the novel “Hero of Our Time” by M. Yu. Lermontov are presented. Particular attention is paid to the image ofthe prince, parodic in relation to Pechorin and “superfluous people”, as well as the storyline of Ivan Flyagin, echoing the line of Maxim Maksimych. The novelty of the study is due to both the little study of the connections between Leskov the artist and the work of Lermontov, and the insufficient coverage of the issue of the historical existence of Lermontov’s novel. It is shown that stylistic tendencies that are stable for Russian literature of the 19th century differ among writers. Along with this, the question is raised about Leskov’s critical view of the Pechorin type; in his story in the foreground is the hero named Ap. Grigoriev “meek” as opposed to the demonic, “predatory” type. It is noted that in the plot of the novel “A Hero of Our Time” Maxim Makimych, personifying a folk character, takes a subordinate place, this is explained by Lermontov’s sympathy for a demonic personality. The author points out that in “The Enchanted Wanderer”, on the contrary, there is a change in the function of the hero; the prince turns into a marginal character, and the Russian righteous man takes the place of the plot center.V. G. MekhtievTsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektovarticleleskovlermontovcomparative analysistypological connectionpechorinismrighteousplotSlavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languagesPG1-9665RUНаучный диалог, Vol 0, Iss 5, Pp 225-236 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	RU
topic	leskov lermontov comparative analysis typological connection pechorinism righteous plot Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665
spellingShingle	leskov lermontov comparative analysis typological connection pechorinism righteous plot Slavic languages. Baltic languages. Albanian languages PG1-9665 V. G. Mekhtiev “Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”
description	The results of a comparative analysis of the novel “The Enchanted Wanderer” by N. S. Leskov and the novel “Hero of Our Time” by M. Yu. Lermontov are presented. Particular attention is paid to the image ofthe prince, parodic in relation to Pechorin and “superfluous people”, as well as the storyline of Ivan Flyagin, echoing the line of Maxim Maksimych. The novelty of the study is due to both the little study of the connections between Leskov the artist and the work of Lermontov, and the insufficient coverage of the issue of the historical existence of Lermontov’s novel. It is shown that stylistic tendencies that are stable for Russian literature of the 19th century differ among writers. Along with this, the question is raised about Leskov’s critical view of the Pechorin type; in his story in the foreground is the hero named Ap. Grigoriev “meek” as opposed to the demonic, “predatory” type. It is noted that in the plot of the novel “A Hero of Our Time” Maxim Makimych, personifying a folk character, takes a subordinate place, this is explained by Lermontov’s sympathy for a demonic personality. The author points out that in “The Enchanted Wanderer”, on the contrary, there is a change in the function of the hero; the prince turns into a marginal character, and the Russian righteous man takes the place of the plot center.
format	article
author	V. G. Mekhtiev
author_facet	V. G. Mekhtiev
author_sort	V. G. Mekhtiev
title	“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”
title_short	“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”
title_full	“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”
title_fullStr	“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”
title_full_unstemmed	“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”
title_sort	“hero of our time” as archetype of plot and images in “enchanted wanderer”
publisher	Tsentr nauchnykh i obrazovatelnykh proektov
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7e3dc00734b5495fa64efb831a7032f5
work_keys_str_mv	AT vgmekhtiev heroofourtimeasarchetypeofplotandimagesinenchantedwanderer
_version_	1718398796178653184

“Hero of Our Time” as Archetype of Plot and Images in “Enchanted Wanderer”

Ejemplares similares