Evaluating prior learning assessment programs: A suggested framework

Over the past two decades, American institutions have been expected to include systematic program reviews to meet accrediting standards, either by independent or governmental review agencies. Program evaluation is critical for several reasons: it provides systematic ways to assess what needs improve...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nan L. Travers, Marnie T. Evans
Format: article
Language:EN
Published: Athabasca University Press 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doaj.org/article/7e5bd4ee91494a41a520cf6c3ccaa548
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Over the past two decades, American institutions have been expected to include systematic program reviews to meet accrediting standards, either by independent or governmental review agencies. Program evaluation is critical for several reasons: it provides systematic ways to assess what needs improvement or what needs changing and it provides ways to validate practices, whether to internal or external audiences (Mishra, 2007). Most program evaluative models are focused on academic programs, which don’t fit the uniqueness of prior learning assessment programs. This paper proposes an evaluative framework for prior learning assessment programs, which takes into account the type of work within prior learning assessment programs and uses program portfolios, similar to how students are asked to document their work.