Comparison of the effect of air tamponade versus no tamponade after pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic epiretinal membrane

Abstract This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with and without air tamponade in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM). We prospectively enrolled 145 patients with iERM who underwent a 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless PPV. Patients were a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kyuhwan Jang, Daniel Duck-Jin Hwang, Jayoung Ahn, Gisung Son, Ji In Park, Joonhong Sohn
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7e6b96d5a68a44aabf527e92060fa758
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
Descripción
Sumario:Abstract This study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with and without air tamponade in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM). We prospectively enrolled 145 patients with iERM who underwent a 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless PPV. Patients were assigned to either the air tamponade (air) group (79 eyes) or balanced salt solution (BSS; no tamponade) group (66 eyes). The central macular thickness (CMT), peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) thickness, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared for two years. At baseline, there were no significant differences between the two groups. CMT and BCVA were not significantly different between the groups for 2 years. However, the air group had a significantly lower thickness in the superior temporal pRNFL sector at 1 month (p = 0.01) and in the inferior temporal and superior temporal pRNFL sectors at 3 months (p = 0.02 for both). There were no significant differences between both groups in all the pRNFL sectors from 6 months to 2 years. The outcomes of PPV with air tamponade and that with no tamponade appear to be equivalent. This shows that air tamponade may not be an imperative procedure for iERM surgery and has no additional benefit.