“Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study

Women are often the victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Though China has established its first statute against domestic violence, the service developments for victims fall behind. It is important to assess community members' perceptions of what causes IPV to create interventions to prev...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fengsu Hou, Catherine Cerulli, Marsha N. Wittink, Eric D. Caine, Peiyuan Qiu
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7e83af3747ca421ba3ec6aa751a71585
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7e83af3747ca421ba3ec6aa751a71585
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7e83af3747ca421ba3ec6aa751a715852021-12-02T07:04:12Z“Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study1664-064010.3389/fpsyt.2021.711819https://doaj.org/article/7e83af3747ca421ba3ec6aa751a715852021-12-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.711819/fullhttps://doaj.org/toc/1664-0640Women are often the victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Though China has established its first statute against domestic violence, the service developments for victims fall behind. It is important to assess community members' perceptions of what causes IPV to create interventions to prevent and address IPV. This study completed the Short Explanatory Model Interview (SEMI) among a subset sample from a large epidemiology study in rural Sichuan China. The social ecological model was applied to analyze qualitative interviews. Among 339 participants, the average age was 46.01 ± 12.42 years old. There were 31.86% of them had been educated, 14.75% of them had migrant worker partners, and 49.26% of them had experienced violence from their partners in the last year. There were 252 participants attributed IPV to individual factors, and they primarily discussed the social characteristics, behaviors, personalities or even health problems of the husband or the wife in the vignette. Under this theme, there were 86 participants blaming the victim for being anxious, social disconnectedness or lazy; and there were 166 participants blaming to the perpetrator being abusive, irresponsibility, lack of understanding, and cheating. There were 44 women believed the cause was relational, in which there were 41 participants attributed the problem to the broken relationship between the couple and three participants attributed to the lack of support. There were 28 participants believed the cause was communal and societal, such as being poor, family problems, fate, and believed IPV was a common scene. There were 15 participants could not identify the cause of IPV. These participants usually provided very brief responses and barely had insight on violent behaviors or confidence in discussing the cause. Our findings offer a direction for understanding the rural Chinese women's beliefs about the etiology of IPV to better develop interventions which must consider raising a public awareness campaign about the risk factors of IPV and focus on reducing self-blame among victims.Fengsu HouFengsu HouCatherine CerulliMarsha N. WittinkEric D. CainePeiyuan QiuFrontiers Media S.A.articleintimate partner violence (IPV)explanatory modelwomen's voicesrural Chinasocial ecological model (SEM)PsychiatryRC435-571ENFrontiers in Psychiatry, Vol 12 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic intimate partner violence (IPV)
explanatory model
women's voices
rural China
social ecological model (SEM)
Psychiatry
RC435-571
spellingShingle intimate partner violence (IPV)
explanatory model
women's voices
rural China
social ecological model (SEM)
Psychiatry
RC435-571
Fengsu Hou
Fengsu Hou
Catherine Cerulli
Marsha N. Wittink
Eric D. Caine
Peiyuan Qiu
“Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
description Women are often the victims of intimate partner violence (IPV). Though China has established its first statute against domestic violence, the service developments for victims fall behind. It is important to assess community members' perceptions of what causes IPV to create interventions to prevent and address IPV. This study completed the Short Explanatory Model Interview (SEMI) among a subset sample from a large epidemiology study in rural Sichuan China. The social ecological model was applied to analyze qualitative interviews. Among 339 participants, the average age was 46.01 ± 12.42 years old. There were 31.86% of them had been educated, 14.75% of them had migrant worker partners, and 49.26% of them had experienced violence from their partners in the last year. There were 252 participants attributed IPV to individual factors, and they primarily discussed the social characteristics, behaviors, personalities or even health problems of the husband or the wife in the vignette. Under this theme, there were 86 participants blaming the victim for being anxious, social disconnectedness or lazy; and there were 166 participants blaming to the perpetrator being abusive, irresponsibility, lack of understanding, and cheating. There were 44 women believed the cause was relational, in which there were 41 participants attributed the problem to the broken relationship between the couple and three participants attributed to the lack of support. There were 28 participants believed the cause was communal and societal, such as being poor, family problems, fate, and believed IPV was a common scene. There were 15 participants could not identify the cause of IPV. These participants usually provided very brief responses and barely had insight on violent behaviors or confidence in discussing the cause. Our findings offer a direction for understanding the rural Chinese women's beliefs about the etiology of IPV to better develop interventions which must consider raising a public awareness campaign about the risk factors of IPV and focus on reducing self-blame among victims.
format article
author Fengsu Hou
Fengsu Hou
Catherine Cerulli
Marsha N. Wittink
Eric D. Caine
Peiyuan Qiu
author_facet Fengsu Hou
Fengsu Hou
Catherine Cerulli
Marsha N. Wittink
Eric D. Caine
Peiyuan Qiu
author_sort Fengsu Hou
title “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_short “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_full “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_fullStr “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_full_unstemmed “Whose Fault Is It?” How Rural Chinese Women Explain Intimate Partner Violence: A Qualitative Study
title_sort “whose fault is it?” how rural chinese women explain intimate partner violence: a qualitative study
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7e83af3747ca421ba3ec6aa751a71585
work_keys_str_mv AT fengsuhou whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT fengsuhou whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT catherinecerulli whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT marshanwittink whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT ericdcaine whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
AT peiyuanqiu whosefaultisithowruralchinesewomenexplainintimatepartnerviolenceaqualitativestudy
_version_ 1718399642850295808