The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait

<span class="abs_content">The Karamat Watan (March of Dignity) was the largest protest mobilisation in Kuwaiti history. From late December 2011 to 2014 this social movement pressured the government in the streets to reform the parliamentary system. The results of these protests were...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal:	Geoffrey Martin
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	Coordinamento SIBA 2021
Materias:	kuwait social movements framing legitimacy arab gulf rentierism arab spring Political science (General) JA1-92
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7ebce7a41c9a462485a1c5d2fb705012
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7ebce7a41c9a462485a1c5d2fb705012
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7ebce7a41c9a462485a1c5d2fb7050122021-11-21T15:11:42ZThe Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait1972-76232035-660910.1285/i20356609v14i2p702https://doaj.org/article/7ebce7a41c9a462485a1c5d2fb7050122021-09-01T00:00:00Zhttp://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/paco/article/view/24254https://doaj.org/toc/1972-7623https://doaj.org/toc/2035-6609<span class="abs_content">The Karamat Watan (March of Dignity) was the largest protest mobilisation in Kuwaiti history. From late December 2011 to 2014 this social movement pressured the government in the streets to reform the parliamentary system. The results of these protests were unprecedented, forcing a Kuwaiti prime minister to resign for the first time in in history and publicly challenging against the country's ruler. Yet the protest movement largely failed, largely due to a loss of public support. Why did the Karamat Watan protest movement lose support from the public in Kuwait? The literature on the Gulf and Kuwait in particular focus on payoffs as a way of explaining acquiesance, yet payoffs in 2011 and 2012 had almost no impact on protest mobilisation. Instead, it may be more normative issues that kept protesters away: the unrealistic and aggressive demands of protest organisers for regime change. This article focuses on the legitimacy, or lackthereof, of the government and regime to explain the failure of the "Arab Spring" protest movement in Kuwait, looking at how consent and normative concerns impacted the decision of protesters to leave the streets. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with citizens who participated in the protests, interviews with dozens of members of the opposition leadership, and group surveys at 13 tribal diwaniyas that highlight a cross-section of protesters' opinion. The research presented demonstrates that public support for the social movement may have in part failed largely because the movement was unsuccessful in framing that it could govern if it was successful. Public support was also limited by protest tactics including disrupting modes of transportation and livelihood. At the heart of protesters' concerns was the lack of a substantive opposition they could believe in and poor opinions on the quality of leadership in Karamat Watan. This article fills a gap in the literature by developing a clearer understanding of legitimation in a rentier state, Kuwait, and by providing dense empirical data to back it up. The utility of this approach is important considering that the failure for many social movements to frame grievances in a way that mobilizes the population, a common pattern in the region.</span><br />Geoffrey MartinCoordinamento SIBAarticlekuwaitsocial movementsframinglegitimacyarab gulfrentierismarab springPolitical science (General)JA1-92ENPartecipazione e Conflitto, Vol 14, Iss 2, Pp 702-726 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	kuwait social movements framing legitimacy arab gulf rentierism arab spring Political science (General) JA1-92
spellingShingle	kuwait social movements framing legitimacy arab gulf rentierism arab spring Political science (General) JA1-92 Geoffrey Martin The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait
description	<span class="abs_content">The Karamat Watan (March of Dignity) was the largest protest mobilisation in Kuwaiti history. From late December 2011 to 2014 this social movement pressured the government in the streets to reform the parliamentary system. The results of these protests were unprecedented, forcing a Kuwaiti prime minister to resign for the first time in in history and publicly challenging against the country's ruler. Yet the protest movement largely failed, largely due to a loss of public support. Why did the Karamat Watan protest movement lose support from the public in Kuwait? The literature on the Gulf and Kuwait in particular focus on payoffs as a way of explaining acquiesance, yet payoffs in 2011 and 2012 had almost no impact on protest mobilisation. Instead, it may be more normative issues that kept protesters away: the unrealistic and aggressive demands of protest organisers for regime change. This article focuses on the legitimacy, or lackthereof, of the government and regime to explain the failure of the "Arab Spring" protest movement in Kuwait, looking at how consent and normative concerns impacted the decision of protesters to leave the streets. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with citizens who participated in the protests, interviews with dozens of members of the opposition leadership, and group surveys at 13 tribal diwaniyas that highlight a cross-section of protesters' opinion. The research presented demonstrates that public support for the social movement may have in part failed largely because the movement was unsuccessful in framing that it could govern if it was successful. Public support was also limited by protest tactics including disrupting modes of transportation and livelihood. At the heart of protesters' concerns was the lack of a substantive opposition they could believe in and poor opinions on the quality of leadership in Karamat Watan. This article fills a gap in the literature by developing a clearer understanding of legitimation in a rentier state, Kuwait, and by providing dense empirical data to back it up. The utility of this approach is important considering that the failure for many social movements to frame grievances in a way that mobilizes the population, a common pattern in the region.</span><br />
format	article
author	Geoffrey Martin
author_facet	Geoffrey Martin
author_sort	Geoffrey Martin
title	The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait
title_short	The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait
title_full	The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait
title_fullStr	The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait
title_full_unstemmed	The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait
title_sort	failure of karamat watan: state legitimacy and protest failure in kuwait
publisher	Coordinamento SIBA
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7ebce7a41c9a462485a1c5d2fb705012
work_keys_str_mv	AT geoffreymartin thefailureofkaramatwatanstatelegitimacyandprotestfailureinkuwait AT geoffreymartin failureofkaramatwatanstatelegitimacyandprotestfailureinkuwait
_version_	1718418710257991680

The Failure of Karamat Watan: State Legitimacy and Protest Failure in Kuwait

Ejemplares similares