Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China

Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) is the functional projection of sustainable development in territory spatial planning. Its rational layout has become the most important task for developing countries to enhance ecological awareness and achieve sustainable goals. This study took the rural ar...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Peng Zeng, Sihui Wu, Zongyao Sun, Yujia Zhu, Yuqi Chen, Zhi Qiao, Liangwa Cai
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN
Publicado:	MDPI AG 2021
Materias:	rural Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) regional endowments quantitative accumulation curve Boosted Regression Tree model (BRT) Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) Agriculture S
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7f68d16f06d54c4cabacb643636ef8ce
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7f68d16f06d54c4cabacb643636ef8ce
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7f68d16f06d54c4cabacb643636ef8ce2021-11-25T18:10:11ZDoes Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China10.3390/land101112652073-445Xhttps://doaj.org/article/7f68d16f06d54c4cabacb643636ef8ce2021-11-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1265https://doaj.org/toc/2073-445XProduction–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) is the functional projection of sustainable development in territory spatial planning. Its rational layout has become the most important task for developing countries to enhance ecological awareness and achieve sustainable goals. This study took the rural areas of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) as an example to analyze the relationship by means of quantitative cumulation between regional endowments (natural factors, location and facilities) and PLES to figure out the preference mechanism. The Boosted Regression Tree model (BRT) was used to obtain the contribution rate of factors and the internal marginal effect between 1980~2018. Our conclusions are as follows: Living space (LS) enjoyed the highest advantage of regional endowment level, followed by production space (PS). Except for the distance to water, other indicators were significantly different in the PLES, and the suitable range of various types was expanded from LS to PS and ecological space (ES). During the transfer, elevation had a universal effect. The process of increasing naturalness was affected by the distance of high-level urban areas, which verified the continuous effect of Chinese ecological civilization. This study clarified the selectivity of regional endowments to PLES, which will greatly guide the direction of regional territory spatial planning and the next step of regional sustainable development.Peng ZengSihui WuZongyao SunYujia ZhuYuqi ChenZhi QiaoLiangwa CaiMDPI AGarticlerural Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES)regional endowmentsquantitative accumulation curveBoosted Regression Tree model (BRT)Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH)AgricultureSENLand, Vol 10, Iss 1265, p 1265 (2021)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN
topic	rural Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) regional endowments quantitative accumulation curve Boosted Regression Tree model (BRT) Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) Agriculture S
spellingShingle	rural Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) regional endowments quantitative accumulation curve Boosted Regression Tree model (BRT) Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) Agriculture S Peng Zeng Sihui Wu Zongyao Sun Yujia Zhu Yuqi Chen Zhi Qiao Liangwa Cai Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China
description	Production–Living–Ecological Space (PLES) is the functional projection of sustainable development in territory spatial planning. Its rational layout has become the most important task for developing countries to enhance ecological awareness and achieve sustainable goals. This study took the rural areas of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei (BTH) as an example to analyze the relationship by means of quantitative cumulation between regional endowments (natural factors, location and facilities) and PLES to figure out the preference mechanism. The Boosted Regression Tree model (BRT) was used to obtain the contribution rate of factors and the internal marginal effect between 1980~2018. Our conclusions are as follows: Living space (LS) enjoyed the highest advantage of regional endowment level, followed by production space (PS). Except for the distance to water, other indicators were significantly different in the PLES, and the suitable range of various types was expanded from LS to PS and ecological space (ES). During the transfer, elevation had a universal effect. The process of increasing naturalness was affected by the distance of high-level urban areas, which verified the continuous effect of Chinese ecological civilization. This study clarified the selectivity of regional endowments to PLES, which will greatly guide the direction of regional territory spatial planning and the next step of regional sustainable development.
format	article
author	Peng Zeng Sihui Wu Zongyao Sun Yujia Zhu Yuqi Chen Zhi Qiao Liangwa Cai
author_facet	Peng Zeng Sihui Wu Zongyao Sun Yujia Zhu Yuqi Chen Zhi Qiao Liangwa Cai
author_sort	Peng Zeng
title	Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China
title_short	Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China
title_full	Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China
title_fullStr	Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China
title_full_unstemmed	Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China
title_sort	does rural production–living–ecological spaces have a preference for regional endowments? a case of beijing-tianjin-hebei, china
publisher	MDPI AG
publishDate	2021
url	https://doaj.org/article/7f68d16f06d54c4cabacb643636ef8ce
work_keys_str_mv	AT pengzeng doesruralproductionlivingecologicalspaceshaveapreferenceforregionalendowmentsacaseofbeijingtianjinhebeichina AT sihuiwu doesruralproductionlivingecologicalspaceshaveapreferenceforregionalendowmentsacaseofbeijingtianjinhebeichina AT zongyaosun doesruralproductionlivingecologicalspaceshaveapreferenceforregionalendowmentsacaseofbeijingtianjinhebeichina AT yujiazhu doesruralproductionlivingecologicalspaceshaveapreferenceforregionalendowmentsacaseofbeijingtianjinhebeichina AT yuqichen doesruralproductionlivingecologicalspaceshaveapreferenceforregionalendowmentsacaseofbeijingtianjinhebeichina AT zhiqiao doesruralproductionlivingecologicalspaceshaveapreferenceforregionalendowmentsacaseofbeijingtianjinhebeichina AT liangwacai doesruralproductionlivingecologicalspaceshaveapreferenceforregionalendowmentsacaseofbeijingtianjinhebeichina
_version_	1718411568619716608

Does Rural Production–Living–Ecological Spaces Have a Preference for Regional Endowments? A Case of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei, China

Ejemplares similares