Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study

Abstract Various non-pharmaceutical interventions were adopted by countries worldwide in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic with adverse socioeconomic side effects, which raises the question about their differential effectiveness. We estimate the average dynamic effect of each intervention on t...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nikolaos Askitas, Konstantinos Tatsiramos, Bertrand Verheyden
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2021
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7f7cfb3f53e74cb0b372928a4439be66
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7f7cfb3f53e74cb0b372928a4439be66
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7f7cfb3f53e74cb0b372928a4439be662021-12-02T11:50:40ZEstimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study10.1038/s41598-021-81442-x2045-2322https://doaj.org/article/7f7cfb3f53e74cb0b372928a4439be662021-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81442-xhttps://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract Various non-pharmaceutical interventions were adopted by countries worldwide in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic with adverse socioeconomic side effects, which raises the question about their differential effectiveness. We estimate the average dynamic effect of each intervention on the incidence of COVID-19 and on people’s whereabouts by developing a statistical model that accounts for the contemporaneous adoption of multiple interventions. Using daily data from 175 countries, we show that, even after controlling for other concurrent lockdown policies, cancelling public events, imposing restrictions on private gatherings and closing schools and workplaces had significant effects on reducing COVID-19 infections. Restrictions on internal movement and public transport had no effects because the aforementioned policies, imposed earlier on average, had already de facto reduced human mobility. International travel restrictions, although imposed early, had a short-lived effect failing to prevent the epidemic from turning into a pandemic because they were less stringent. We interpret the impact of each intervention on containing the pandemic using a conceptual framework which relies on their effects on human mobility behaviors in a manner consistent with time-use and epidemiological factors.Nikolaos AskitasKonstantinos TatsiramosBertrand VerheydenNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 11, Iss 1, Pp 1-13 (2021)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Nikolaos Askitas
Konstantinos Tatsiramos
Bertrand Verheyden
Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study
description Abstract Various non-pharmaceutical interventions were adopted by countries worldwide in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic with adverse socioeconomic side effects, which raises the question about their differential effectiveness. We estimate the average dynamic effect of each intervention on the incidence of COVID-19 and on people’s whereabouts by developing a statistical model that accounts for the contemporaneous adoption of multiple interventions. Using daily data from 175 countries, we show that, even after controlling for other concurrent lockdown policies, cancelling public events, imposing restrictions on private gatherings and closing schools and workplaces had significant effects on reducing COVID-19 infections. Restrictions on internal movement and public transport had no effects because the aforementioned policies, imposed earlier on average, had already de facto reduced human mobility. International travel restrictions, although imposed early, had a short-lived effect failing to prevent the epidemic from turning into a pandemic because they were less stringent. We interpret the impact of each intervention on containing the pandemic using a conceptual framework which relies on their effects on human mobility behaviors in a manner consistent with time-use and epidemiological factors.
format article
author Nikolaos Askitas
Konstantinos Tatsiramos
Bertrand Verheyden
author_facet Nikolaos Askitas
Konstantinos Tatsiramos
Bertrand Verheyden
author_sort Nikolaos Askitas
title Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study
title_short Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study
title_full Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study
title_fullStr Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study
title_full_unstemmed Estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on COVID-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study
title_sort estimating worldwide effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions on covid-19 incidence and population mobility patterns using a multiple-event study
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2021
url https://doaj.org/article/7f7cfb3f53e74cb0b372928a4439be66
work_keys_str_mv AT nikolaosaskitas estimatingworldwideeffectsofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsoncovid19incidenceandpopulationmobilitypatternsusingamultipleeventstudy
AT konstantinostatsiramos estimatingworldwideeffectsofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsoncovid19incidenceandpopulationmobilitypatternsusingamultipleeventstudy
AT bertrandverheyden estimatingworldwideeffectsofnonpharmaceuticalinterventionsoncovid19incidenceandpopulationmobilitypatternsusingamultipleeventstudy
_version_ 1718395173292998656