Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan

The economic evaluation of the Interurban Bridge Management System (IBMS) aims to determine the priority of bridge handling. One of the calculations required in NPV and IRR calculations used in priority handling is the cost of replacing the bridge. Over time, the IBMS system must be constantly updat...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Risang Aji Dananjoyo, Akhmad Aminullah, Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho
Formato:	article
Lenguaje:	EN ID
Publicado:	Universitas Gadjah Mada 2020
Materias:	bridge life-cycle cost Technology T Technology (General) T1-995 Science Q Science (General) Q1-390
Acceso en línea:	https://doaj.org/article/7fafcac82dae477f8c6dc51638d754a7
Etiquetas:	Agregar Etiqueta Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!

id	oai:doaj.org-article:7fafcac82dae477f8c6dc51638d754a7
record_format	dspace
spelling	oai:doaj.org-article:7fafcac82dae477f8c6dc51638d754a72021-11-14T03:34:21ZPenerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan2089-61312443-131110.22146/teknosains.39052https://doaj.org/article/7fafcac82dae477f8c6dc51638d754a72020-07-01T00:00:00Zhttps://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/teknosains/article/view/39052https://doaj.org/toc/2089-6131https://doaj.org/toc/2443-1311The economic evaluation of the Interurban Bridge Management System (IBMS) aims to determine the priority of bridge handling. One of the calculations required in NPV and IRR calculations used in priority handling is the cost of replacing the bridge. Over time, the IBMS system must be constantly updated to continue to use in accordance with current circumstances and use new, better methods. This study uses Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) method as an alternative method to calculate the replacement cost of 5 bridges in D.I. Yogyakarta in 2012. The IBMS method produces a priority sequence of bridge handling with Bogo bridge, Suru bridge, Winongo bridge, Kalasan B bridge and Duren bridge in sequence. The LCC method produces a priority sequence of bridge handling with Bogo bridge, Winongo bridge, Suru bridge, Kalasan B bridge and Duren bridge. A. The average initial cost of bridge replacement using both methods is 23.012%. The value earned using the Life-Cycle Cost method is always greater due to the addition of inspection fees, maintenance costs, and bridge damage costs.Risang Aji DananjoyoAkhmad AminullahArief Setiawan Budi NugrohoUniversitas Gadjah Madaarticlebridge life-cycle costTechnologyTTechnology (General)T1-995ScienceQScience (General)Q1-390ENIDJurnal Teknosains: Jurnal Ilmiah Sains dan Teknologi, Vol 9, Iss 2, Pp 165-178 (2020)
institution	DOAJ
collection	DOAJ
language	EN ID
topic	bridge life-cycle cost Technology T Technology (General) T1-995 Science Q Science (General) Q1-390
spellingShingle	bridge life-cycle cost Technology T Technology (General) T1-995 Science Q Science (General) Q1-390 Risang Aji Dananjoyo Akhmad Aminullah Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan
description	The economic evaluation of the Interurban Bridge Management System (IBMS) aims to determine the priority of bridge handling. One of the calculations required in NPV and IRR calculations used in priority handling is the cost of replacing the bridge. Over time, the IBMS system must be constantly updated to continue to use in accordance with current circumstances and use new, better methods. This study uses Life-Cycle Cost (LCC) method as an alternative method to calculate the replacement cost of 5 bridges in D.I. Yogyakarta in 2012. The IBMS method produces a priority sequence of bridge handling with Bogo bridge, Suru bridge, Winongo bridge, Kalasan B bridge and Duren bridge in sequence. The LCC method produces a priority sequence of bridge handling with Bogo bridge, Winongo bridge, Suru bridge, Kalasan B bridge and Duren bridge. A. The average initial cost of bridge replacement using both methods is 23.012%. The value earned using the Life-Cycle Cost method is always greater due to the addition of inspection fees, maintenance costs, and bridge damage costs.
format	article
author	Risang Aji Dananjoyo Akhmad Aminullah Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho
author_facet	Risang Aji Dananjoyo Akhmad Aminullah Arief Setiawan Budi Nugroho
author_sort	Risang Aji Dananjoyo
title	Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan
title_short	Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan
title_full	Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan
title_fullStr	Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan
title_full_unstemmed	Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan
title_sort	penerapan metode life-cyclecost dalam perhitungan evaluasi ekonomi jembatan untuk penetuan prioritas penanganan jembatan
publisher	Universitas Gadjah Mada
publishDate	2020
url	https://doaj.org/article/7fafcac82dae477f8c6dc51638d754a7
work_keys_str_mv	AT risangajidananjoyo penerapanmetodelifecyclecostdalamperhitunganevaluasiekonomijembatanuntukpenetuanprioritaspenangananjembatan AT akhmadaminullah penerapanmetodelifecyclecostdalamperhitunganevaluasiekonomijembatanuntukpenetuanprioritaspenangananjembatan AT ariefsetiawanbudinugroho penerapanmetodelifecyclecostdalamperhitunganevaluasiekonomijembatanuntukpenetuanprioritaspenangananjembatan
_version_	1718430024124596224

Penerapan Metode Life-CycleCost dalam Perhitungan Evaluasi Ekonomi Jembatan untuk Penetuan Prioritas Penanganan Jembatan

Ejemplares similares