Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.

<h4>Background</h4>Studies have persistently shown deficiencies in medical reporting by the mainstream media. We have been monitoring the accuracy and comprehensiveness of medical news reporting in Australia since mid 2004. This analysis of more than 1200 stories in the Australian media...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amanda Wilson, Billie Bonevski, Alison Jones, David Henry
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2009
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/7fee6f87b06f4e51913f9a32f17fb3f9
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:7fee6f87b06f4e51913f9a32f17fb3f9
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:7fee6f87b06f4e51913f9a32f17fb3f92021-11-25T06:16:38ZMedia reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.1932-620310.1371/journal.pone.0004831https://doaj.org/article/7fee6f87b06f4e51913f9a32f17fb3f92009-01-01T00:00:00Zhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/19293924/pdf/?tool=EBIhttps://doaj.org/toc/1932-6203<h4>Background</h4>Studies have persistently shown deficiencies in medical reporting by the mainstream media. We have been monitoring the accuracy and comprehensiveness of medical news reporting in Australia since mid 2004. This analysis of more than 1200 stories in the Australian media compares different types of media outlets and examines reporting trends over time.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Between March 2004 and June 2008 1230 news stories were rated on a national medical news monitoring web site, Media Doctor Australia. These covered a variety of health interventions ranging from drugs, diagnostic tests and surgery to dietary and complementary therapies. Each story was independently assessed by two reviewers using ten criteria. Scores were expressed as percentages of total assessable items deemed satisfactory according to a coding guide. Analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores and Fishers exact test to compare proportions. Trends over time were analysed using un-weighted linear regression analysis. Broadsheet newspapers had the highest average satisfactory scores: 58% (95% CI 56-60%), compared with tabloid newspapers and online news outlets, 48% (95% CI 44-52) and 48% (95% CI 46-50) respectively. The lowest scores were assigned to stories broadcast by human interest/current affairs television programmes (average score 33% (95% CI 28-38)). While there was a non- significant increase in average scores for all outlets, a significant improvement was seen in the online news media: a rise of 5.1% (95%CI 1.32, 8.97; P 0.009). Statistically significant improvements were seen in coverage of the potential harms of interventions, the availability of treatment or diagnostic options, and accurate quantification of benefits.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Although the overall quality of medical reporting in the general media remains poor, this study showed modest improvements in some areas. However, the most striking finding was the continuing very poor coverage of health news by commercial current affairs television programs.Amanda WilsonBillie BonevskiAlison JonesDavid HenryPublic Library of Science (PLoS)articleMedicineRScienceQENPLoS ONE, Vol 4, Iss 3, p e4831 (2009)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Amanda Wilson
Billie Bonevski
Alison Jones
David Henry
Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
description <h4>Background</h4>Studies have persistently shown deficiencies in medical reporting by the mainstream media. We have been monitoring the accuracy and comprehensiveness of medical news reporting in Australia since mid 2004. This analysis of more than 1200 stories in the Australian media compares different types of media outlets and examines reporting trends over time.<h4>Methods and findings</h4>Between March 2004 and June 2008 1230 news stories were rated on a national medical news monitoring web site, Media Doctor Australia. These covered a variety of health interventions ranging from drugs, diagnostic tests and surgery to dietary and complementary therapies. Each story was independently assessed by two reviewers using ten criteria. Scores were expressed as percentages of total assessable items deemed satisfactory according to a coding guide. Analysis of variance was used to compare mean scores and Fishers exact test to compare proportions. Trends over time were analysed using un-weighted linear regression analysis. Broadsheet newspapers had the highest average satisfactory scores: 58% (95% CI 56-60%), compared with tabloid newspapers and online news outlets, 48% (95% CI 44-52) and 48% (95% CI 46-50) respectively. The lowest scores were assigned to stories broadcast by human interest/current affairs television programmes (average score 33% (95% CI 28-38)). While there was a non- significant increase in average scores for all outlets, a significant improvement was seen in the online news media: a rise of 5.1% (95%CI 1.32, 8.97; P 0.009). Statistically significant improvements were seen in coverage of the potential harms of interventions, the availability of treatment or diagnostic options, and accurate quantification of benefits.<h4>Conclusion</h4>Although the overall quality of medical reporting in the general media remains poor, this study showed modest improvements in some areas. However, the most striking finding was the continuing very poor coverage of health news by commercial current affairs television programs.
format article
author Amanda Wilson
Billie Bonevski
Alison Jones
David Henry
author_facet Amanda Wilson
Billie Bonevski
Alison Jones
David Henry
author_sort Amanda Wilson
title Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
title_short Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
title_full Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
title_fullStr Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
title_full_unstemmed Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
title_sort media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
publishDate 2009
url https://doaj.org/article/7fee6f87b06f4e51913f9a32f17fb3f9
work_keys_str_mv AT amandawilson mediareportingofhealthinterventionssignsofimprovementbutmajorproblemspersist
AT billiebonevski mediareportingofhealthinterventionssignsofimprovementbutmajorproblemspersist
AT alisonjones mediareportingofhealthinterventionssignsofimprovementbutmajorproblemspersist
AT davidhenry mediareportingofhealthinterventionssignsofimprovementbutmajorproblemspersist
_version_ 1718413992906457088