Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test

Abstract The clinical diagnostics of olfactory dysfunction in children turns out to be challenging due to low attention span, insufficient linguistic development and lack of odor experiences. Several smell tests have been developed for adults. Most of these examinations take a relatively long time a...

Descripción completa

Guardado en:
Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janine Gellrich, Carolin Stetzler, Anna Oleszkiewicz, Thomas Hummel, Valentin A. Schriever
Formato: article
Lenguaje:EN
Publicado: Nature Portfolio 2017
Materias:
R
Q
Acceso en línea:https://doaj.org/article/800463de1d5940f7ab40b176f2fa8891
Etiquetas: Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
id oai:doaj.org-article:800463de1d5940f7ab40b176f2fa8891
record_format dspace
spelling oai:doaj.org-article:800463de1d5940f7ab40b176f2fa88912021-12-02T16:06:31ZOlfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test10.1038/s41598-017-01465-12045-2322https://doaj.org/article/800463de1d5940f7ab40b176f2fa88912017-05-01T00:00:00Zhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01465-1https://doaj.org/toc/2045-2322Abstract The clinical diagnostics of olfactory dysfunction in children turns out to be challenging due to low attention span, insufficient linguistic development and lack of odor experiences. Several smell tests have been developed for adults. Most of these examinations take a relatively long time and require a high level of concentration. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to evaluate an odor discrimination and olfactory threshold test using the frequently used “Sniffin’ Sticks” in children and adolescents in a simplified two-alternative-forced-choice version (2AFC) and compare it to the original three-alternative-forced-choice test (3AFC). One-hundred-twenty-one healthy participants aged between 5 and 17 years took part in this study. Within each of the two sessions participants underwent olfactory testing using the modified 2AFC as well as the standard 3AFC method. A better test-retest reliability was achieved using the original 3AFC method compared to the modified 2AFC. This was true for the odor discrimination as well as the olfactory threshold. Age had a significant influence on both tests, which should be considered when testing young children. We discuss these findings with relation to the existing norms and recommend using the 3AFC version due to a better test-retest reliability to measure olfactory function in children.Janine GellrichCarolin StetzlerAnna OleszkiewiczThomas HummelValentin A. SchrieverNature PortfolioarticleMedicineRScienceQENScientific Reports, Vol 7, Iss 1, Pp 1-6 (2017)
institution DOAJ
collection DOAJ
language EN
topic Medicine
R
Science
Q
spellingShingle Medicine
R
Science
Q
Janine Gellrich
Carolin Stetzler
Anna Oleszkiewicz
Thomas Hummel
Valentin A. Schriever
Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test
description Abstract The clinical diagnostics of olfactory dysfunction in children turns out to be challenging due to low attention span, insufficient linguistic development and lack of odor experiences. Several smell tests have been developed for adults. Most of these examinations take a relatively long time and require a high level of concentration. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to evaluate an odor discrimination and olfactory threshold test using the frequently used “Sniffin’ Sticks” in children and adolescents in a simplified two-alternative-forced-choice version (2AFC) and compare it to the original three-alternative-forced-choice test (3AFC). One-hundred-twenty-one healthy participants aged between 5 and 17 years took part in this study. Within each of the two sessions participants underwent olfactory testing using the modified 2AFC as well as the standard 3AFC method. A better test-retest reliability was achieved using the original 3AFC method compared to the modified 2AFC. This was true for the odor discrimination as well as the olfactory threshold. Age had a significant influence on both tests, which should be considered when testing young children. We discuss these findings with relation to the existing norms and recommend using the 3AFC version due to a better test-retest reliability to measure olfactory function in children.
format article
author Janine Gellrich
Carolin Stetzler
Anna Oleszkiewicz
Thomas Hummel
Valentin A. Schriever
author_facet Janine Gellrich
Carolin Stetzler
Anna Oleszkiewicz
Thomas Hummel
Valentin A. Schriever
author_sort Janine Gellrich
title Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test
title_short Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test
title_full Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test
title_fullStr Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test
title_full_unstemmed Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “Sniffin’ Sticks” test
title_sort olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children – evaluation of a modified “sniffin’ sticks” test
publisher Nature Portfolio
publishDate 2017
url https://doaj.org/article/800463de1d5940f7ab40b176f2fa8891
work_keys_str_mv AT janinegellrich olfactorythresholdandodordiscriminationabilityinchildrenevaluationofamodifiedsniffinstickstest
AT carolinstetzler olfactorythresholdandodordiscriminationabilityinchildrenevaluationofamodifiedsniffinstickstest
AT annaoleszkiewicz olfactorythresholdandodordiscriminationabilityinchildrenevaluationofamodifiedsniffinstickstest
AT thomashummel olfactorythresholdandodordiscriminationabilityinchildrenevaluationofamodifiedsniffinstickstest
AT valentinaschriever olfactorythresholdandodordiscriminationabilityinchildrenevaluationofamodifiedsniffinstickstest
_version_ 1718384972121767936